It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Just my opinion, I'm not trained for this kind of stuff.
Originally posted by raifordko
reply to post by add alone
If he had a will that said he wanted to be cremated, his family would have no say in the matter. Thats just how it works.
Originally posted by teachtaire
I'm going off of what I've seen of car crash victims who were burned and that scene in star wars where the bodies of Aunt Em and Uncle whoever were left burned to a crisp after the stormtroopers.
Originally posted by xDeadcowx
So they do an autopsy, then cremate the body, without permission from the family, and before the results of the autopsy come back. Seems legit.
On the other hand, doing the autopsy behind closed doors, then cremating the body before anyone else gets a chance to check it out sure does stop any chances of "approved" findings to be disputed.
Bodies are not cremated without expressed consent by the will, or the family of a person. This screams cover up and it should be interesting to see if anything comes of it. I doubt it will though, the LAPD seems to be keeping this one under wraps, which gives them ample time to re-write the report however they want, with no opportunity for anyone to question any of the findings. Mighty convenient.
DC
Originally posted by generik
well we all know that cremation can cover up almost anything, gun shot wounds, poisons, or anything else for that matter.
let me ask a question, who identified the body? did any of the family ever see the body? could this possibly be a cover up in another way, as well as hiding cause of death or anything else it could completely hide the identity of the body. could it even NOT BE Michael Hastings? i doubt you could for example get a DNA test done on ashes. could Michael Hastings actually be detained somewhere? as he is "officially dead" who would know. they could hold him forever, torture him, whatever since he would not be missed. they would have all the time in the world to get any information out of him they want, and not ever have to worry about any methods used to extract it.
kinda wish we could examine the car. why do i suspect it has already been destroyed. did anyone actually see Michael Hastings in the car? did anyone actually see a body removed from the wreck? questions, questions
could the family sue the heck out of them over this? i mean cremating a body without permission of the family is a VERY BIG NO NO.
Originally posted by teachtaire
So they should have used superglue and gelatin to put the ashes back together?
Man dies in house fire after getting drunk and forgetting stove on.
Conspirazees! Teh gubbmint!
More like cause and effect: die in fire, get burned like a marshmallow.
Originally posted by teachtaire
The car did that...
"OMG! THE BODY WAS CREMATED!"
Yah, cuz the guys body was in a TINY METAL INFERNO OF DOOM!
Honestly, what did you all expect? For him to be miraculously fireproof?
Originally posted by SubTruth
Originally posted by teachtaire
The car did that...
"OMG! THE BODY WAS CREMATED!"
Yah, cuz the guys body was in a TINY METAL INFERNO OF DOOM!
Honestly, what did you all expect? For him to be miraculously fireproof?
What if the government wanted people to look the other way how could they do that? It think the best way would be to pay people to sign up and post crap posts that try and deflect and spin the facts. They would tend to be newer members and only post for a short period of time because people would catch on.
Readers and ATS members ask yourself have you seen this before? I believe we see it everyday on ATS.
Originally posted by teachtaire
The car did that...
"OMG! THE BODY WAS CREMATED!"
Yah, cuz the guys body was in a TINY METAL INFERNO OF DOOM!
Honestly, what did you all expect? For him to be miraculously fireproof?