It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
I wonder if countries ever practice peaceful diplomacy games, yano, just incase talks break out.
You mean like a backroom confidential meetings where they discuss subjects or topics that "we" probably don't even know exist in the first place? And then laugh about it?
Possible.
But if that were true than "the mainstream media" would get caught lying from time to time, and international news stories would be heavily skewed by deception geared towards overt manipulation. But when has that happened?
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
I wonder if countries ever practice peaceful diplomacy games, yano, just incase talks break out.
You mean like a backroom confidential meetings where they discuss subjects or topics that "we" probably don't even know exist in the first place? And then laugh about it?
Possible.
But if that were true than "the mainstream media" would get caught lying from time to time, and international news stories would be heavily skewed by deception geared towards overt manipulation. But when has that happened?
Hahaha i see your point, Just hate the talk of nations bigging themselves up. If world war broke out again, how many millions would be killed this time?
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
The Russian War Games come after an supposed Israeli air strike in Syria at least this shows number of reasons why we shouldn't intervene.
Why in this case Assad wont step down yet until the 2014 Syrian elections. Yet War mongers like Sen Levin whose retiring and McCain both whom love nothing but wars.
edit on 17-7-2013 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LeBombDiggity
I don't doubt Russian forces are exercising. But those figures for troop movements, tank numbers etc are just hopelessly ambitious. I think the Russians would be fortunate to get 10 warships to sea at once in the Pacific and as for 5,000+ tanks ? Dubious stats I think.
Originally posted by RalagaNarHallas
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
good link wabbit i did not know russia was that low in population 142 million china has them almost 10 to 1 in all areas except air craft,i also NEVER thought i would see Russian artillery dwarfed by another nation so that was surprising as well.
looking at Russian strengths it seems they far out pace china in logistical forces not to mention the often forgotten Russian ally that is winter,and in most cases a Chinese land invasion would have to go through Siberia.......not something i would want to try as a general in any army.although the numbers are much in the favor of china as far as naval actions go i would assume that Russian naval forces will have the edge in tech and experience,not to mention the Russians basically built the Chinese carrier so its weakness should be know to them.
Russia has one thing alot of nations dont have decent oil reserves located within their own borders which seem to be something china has always lacked so thanks for the interesting read wrabbit!
i dont think its likely to indicate a big shift in Russian strategy for them to target china with these games but it does go to show that like the us Russia likes to be prepared for any situation and probably has a variety of contingency plans for any kind of future conflict
Originally posted by ionwind
I don't think we should underestimate the Russians (ask Napoleon and Hitler). Overestimating their capabilities will not hurt us, except financially.
I may get flamed, but in a way it may be good to have more than one superpower. You have checks and balances, like the Congress and Senate. Does anyone doubt Syria wouldn't already have been "liberated" if the Russians and Chinese hadn't made so much noise?
From Strangelove: Mr. President, we must not allow... a mine shaft gap!
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by LeBombDiggity
I don't doubt Russian forces are exercising. But those figures for troop movements, tank numbers etc are just hopelessly ambitious. I think the Russians would be fortunate to get 10 warships to sea at once in the Pacific and as for 5,000+ tanks ? Dubious stats I think.
Not really - The Russian Army (and other organisations like the Border units, Internal Ministry units etc) have millions of active and reserve personnel, plus many tens of thousands of Armoured vehicles, albeit most are cold War era relics. Likewise, the Russian Pacific Fleet does have numerous ships, although mostly Submarines and amphibious vessels rather than actual Combat warships.
It isn't "hopelessly ambitious" in the slightest.
Originally posted by ATSWATCHER
You do know that the U.S. only has 5000+ M1A1/2 the other 3500 have been out of commission for YEARS
F-15 only around 230-240 187 FA/22 will be no match for S-400/366/7 MiG-31