It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sovaka
reply to post by neo96
That isn't proof... In the very quote that you posted, the whole scenario is hinged on an 'if'.
Furthermore, it states that IF it was happening, the support appears to be "limited".
Either way, it isn't proof that Iran initiated an invasion.
In addition, Saudi Arabia and Iran – as competitors for regional hegemony – supported Afghan militias hostile towards each other.[44] According to Human Rights Watch, Iran assisted the Shia Hazara Hezb-i Wahdat forces of Abdul Ali Mazari, as Iran attempted to maximize Wahdat's military power and influence.[42][44][45] Saudi Arabia supported the Wahhabite Abdul Rasul Sayyaf and his Ittihad-i Islami faction.[42][44] Conflict between the two militias soon escalated. A publication by the George Washington University describes: [O]utside forces saw instability in Afghanistan as an opportunity to press their own security and political agendas.[46]
Originally posted by RedShirt73
reply to post by neo96
Forget about the rest of my post??? Would you agree or disagree???
Just as Israel and the US are doing right now with all their rhetoric towards Iran. Do you think Israel would give up it's nuclear weapons program given that it's surrounded by countries that aren't exactly in love with them? It's called a double standard.
Originally posted by neo96
Originally posted by RedShirt73
reply to post by neo96
Forget about the rest of my post??? Would you agree or disagree???
This?
Just as Israel and the US are doing right now with all their rhetoric towards Iran. Do you think Israel would give up it's nuclear weapons program given that it's surrounded by countries that aren't exactly in love with them? It's called a double standard.
Yeah it's a double standard as that 'excuse' works for Isreal.
edit on 16-7-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Yeah it's a double standard as that 'excuse' works for Isreal.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by RedShirt73
Yeah it's a double standard as that 'excuse' works for Isreal.
Miss that?
As in Israel has the 'right to defend' itself from the 'hawkish' Iran.
Why do people insist on playing the Iranian victim card?
They aren't, and never have been, or even close.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by RedShirt73
How many times do I have to say
PROXY WARS IN:
Afghaniistan twice
Iraq
Syria
Lebannon
Done here since no one wants to listen to anything, but 'Poor little ole Iran'.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by RedShirt73
So?
What Iran the only country who get's to do it?
Guess so since this thread is not about the US but it is always the go to deflection.
Diplomats said it was Russia, backed by China, that refused to declare Tehran's missile launches a violation of the U.N. restrictions, as a U.N. Panel of Experts on Iran said was the case.
"It's not that bad to have behind you the Russians, the Chinese and Iranians," Qadri Jamil, Syria's deputy prime minister for economic affairs, told The Financial Times. "Those three countries are helping us politically, militarily -- and also economically." Read more: www.upi.com...
Yeah Gods Sir look at the countries the USA support , for instance the home of the majority of the 9/11 terrorists, Saudi Arabia, it is one of the world’s most oppressive countries . Torture, public executions, floggings and stoning without legal proceedings are all forms of capital punishment endorsed by the Saudi regime. Women are severely restricted in the country and have to obtain permission from a male guardian if they want to travel, work, study or marry. Saudi women are also banned from driving and freedom of speech, opposition parties and political gatherings are also banned.
The support of the USA for Iraq against Iran, that's not a big secret, I copied the next piece from the internet: upload.wikimedia.org... United States support for Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War, against post-revolutionary Iran, included several billion dollars worth of economic aid, the sale of dual-use technology, non-U.S. origin weaponry, military intelligence, Special Operations training, and direct involvement in warfare against Iran.
Support from the U.S. for Iraq was not a secret a
Also, Libya,
And not let those evil Taliban fellows that Bush hate's so much ,it's funny then that in 1997, while George W. Bush was governor of Texas, a delegation of Taliban leaders from Afghanistan flew to Houston Texas to discuss the building of a pipeline through Afghanistan bringing natural gas from the Caspian Sea. Even thought this endeavour did not materialise , what were these supposed enemy of freedom doing in the USA in the first place?