It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
reply to post by Lone12
Although Egyptian has its own pictographs, Hebrew is based on Phonetician. This originated as a Northern Semitic Language and is not Egyptian. This was Abraham's language and originates from the Canaanites. Phoenician 1700 BC is the origin of Pictographs of Phoenician. Semitic is the key to the Abrahamic language. 1000 BC shows the complete language emerging. Literacy comes to those nations using the Semitic script, which is where Greek, Latin and our beloved English come from today. Hebrew is another version, but we can use the Pictographs from the original to define the other languages. You cannot use the hieroglyphics to do this. Instead, the Egyptians moved over to the Semitic.
Proto-Egyptian came from Sumerian script. They are not compatable as you suggest. Nothing that an Egyptian could have done would change the Phoenician meanings. Here is a correspondence that shows a dim match with the earliest meaning of Phoenician. We can know these meanings apart form the Egyptian. Of the 140 hyrogliphics, only around 30 are sound signs. Sumarian had over 2000 letters. Later, they had 600.
There has been no language on earth studied and scrutinized more than Hebrew. To suggest a conspiracy would be absurd. It's the only language on Earth that was lost to its civilization, then regained it, complete with the sounds of its origin. God stated in the Bible that it would be lost, then found. We are seeing the complete meaning today emerge. Again, all things become known in the end.
edit on 15-7-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MamaJ
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Like you said earlier, I show what I see only. To me, theology is a box we build our version of God from. My idea has always been to open that box. There is a concept in quantum mechanics called quantum tunneling. No matter how you hide a particle in a confined space, it will always free itself. I think this applies directly to truth. Truth will not be held in a box. It must be free. The Bible says that if we seek diligently and knock on every door, the doors open. I am simply relating what I see. Also in physics, there is an idea of invariable symmetry. Neutrons and Protons adhere to this symmetry because they are the strong forces. They possess invariable symmetry. Electrons do not abide by this symmetry. The weak forces is free, just as our own free will is allowed to reign for a time. Eventually, we will be brought back into God's invariable symmetry. Gaining the Holy Spirit is comparable to this. The strong force in physics will always heel the electron. When we find truth, it must be the same no matter how its turned. To me, this is when we have found the highest axiom. It matters little to me what other theology boxes say. I need to fill my own.
This above is the very reason why I understand your pov and totally experience what you learn when you bring it to ATS. We both have a love for Science and the way nature works. We both have a will to understand the Bible and its authenticity.
I believe the tunneling is done by the Neutrino? I could be wrong.... but you are so right EWR... you cannot contain the truth. The truth is always set free!
Originally posted by MamaJ
reply to post by Lone12
Believe what ya want... Im not going to tell you about your logic from my pov... I will leave that for you.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
I agree. I would love for you to take the OP apart piece by piece and give me your view. You have visited many of my threads and I think this one is the brightest light God has used yet through my perspective. Read my replies as well. My confidence comes from a job well done and not the pride of incredulity. This truth has witnesses and I believe that the word 'proof' is in order as an evident axiom to challenge. Can you challenge the details with some context?
Sorry, EWR. You went so far down a rabbit hole that I couldn't possibly comprehend, much less follow and debate. But I'll say one thing for you, when you believe in something you go all out in defending that belief. If you put this much energy and conviction into some worldly endeavor you'd be unstoppable.edit on 7/15/2013 by jiggerj because: (no reason given)
Worldly Endeavor: Bass Guitar
LOL Actually I meant physically saving the whales or feeding the hungry, instead of waiting for the love of god to fix things, but the wow factor is still there.
Originally posted by ddaniel
reply to post by EnochWasRight
After reading over your posts again, I think we're on the same page - your angle is simply much more intellectual than mine. I'm a sucker for simple teachings.
It's humbling how much you have studied into this, and I appreciate your effort in this thread. Thanks for a good mental workout!edit on 15-7-2013 by ddaniel because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SpearMint
You can't use any holy books to prove anything. It's like quoting The Lord Of The Rings to prove Hobbits exist, it's a construct of man.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
Originally posted by SpearMint
You can't use any holy books to prove anything. It's like quoting The Lord Of The Rings to prove Hobbits exist, it's a construct of man.
Constructs of man can be seen with error most often. This goes way beyond any nomad in the desert.
Originally posted by Lone12
apply to your username, and start READING the book of Henoch for once EWR
about the stars who are being judged [ the egyptian ennead ] :
'and the 4th was Peemude, [ = thoth, the SCRIBE] , who teached the children of man to write with pen and ink; but Gods children were never MENT to have to show their faith by pen and ink"
why not ?
because *written words are a ground for conducting SORCERY upon them * !
by Twisting them
giving them another context
another consciousness
etc etc
Dont give me this dribble mamaJ and EWR
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
Originally posted by SpearMint
You can't use any holy books to prove anything. It's like quoting The Lord Of The Rings to prove Hobbits exist, it's a construct of man.
Constructs of man can be seen with error most often. This goes way beyond any nomad in the desert.
You based your reasoning on the Bible. The Bible, being a construct of man, has no credibility and could contain anything that it's creators wanted it to contain. Whatever they felt like writing, you would be quoting now as truth. For this reason you cannot use quotes from the Bible to prove anything if you want to be taken seriously by anyone that isn't as brainwashed as you are. I notice a lot of your posts contain such quotes. I would have respect for your opinion if you used logic and reason to argue your point, or even based it on something with credibility.edit on 15-7-2013 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
You didn't prove anything in one word in your OP.
Misleading title. 2nd line.