Your own words say that there is no end, yet God's word clearly says to take a rest from creation. The Sabbath comes at the end of each 6000 years
cycle. 1000 years is a rest period. In Genesis 1, God rested on the seventh day. In Genesis 2, a new creation was built by the Son of God (Lord) in
the form of Adam. We are now at the end of the 6th day again. Death is the end if we remove God. As the language says clearly, death is Mem Tav.
We must acknowledge the one that begins our good work.
You say I am cherry picking. Which of our two versions adheres to what he word actually says? Our own current history speaks to the tyranny that the
book of Revelation clearly states is coming. On so many different levels, I can show you how the profoundly simple Truth of Aleph Mem Tav shows the
world around us.
How many electrons, protons and neutrons are there in Carbon, the mark of mankind?
18 This calls for wisdom. Let the person who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man.[e] That number is 666.
The mark of mankind is Carbon. The beast being sacrificed is the one we wear as a body. The soul is being refined in and water (Baptism) puts out
fire. The fire is coming and I am simply warning you to see the Strength bringing it before the message comes to a close. God is what he says he is,
even if his invariable symmetry goes against our will and pride.
By the way, invariable symmetry is why strong nuclear forces always capture the weak force. This is because the Proton has two up quarks and one
down. The neutron has two down and one up. They both follow invariable symmetry. The electron (-) weak force does not follow this law. What does
God's word say about the subject of invariable symmetry and strength?
8 There was a man all alone;
he had neither son nor brother.
There was no end to his toil,
yet his eyes were not content with his wealth.
“For whom am I toiling,” he asked,
“and why am I depriving myself of enjoyment?”
This too is meaningless—
a miserable business!
THE TRUTH was revealed to him here:
9 Two are better than one,
because they have a good return for their labor:
10 If either of them falls down,
one can help the other up.
But pity anyone who falls
and has no one to help them up.
11 Also, if two lie down together, they will keep warm.
But how can one keep warm alone?
12 Though one may be overpowered,
two can defend themselves.
A cord of three strands is not quickly broken.
Who is that Man? Christ. We are his workmanship. On the cross, between the neutron (Christ) there were two thieves. The proton is the thief that
repented. The electron is the one that went somewhere else in pride. All of nature is a mirror. Know the lesser case and the greater case shows
Originally posted by RomeByFire
I'll make it real simple for you OP; God doesn't have a religion, and no man should act as if he understands Gods will or capabilities.
And by the way, we live in an infinite universe. That means there is no beginning, no end. It's always existed, yet it never has. Two things to note
1. If there is a Creator to our Universe, he would be so far out of the human capacity of perception for us to know. It is unadulterated ignorance to
claim to know the inner-workings of God, citing a man-made book written 3,500 years ago and that is paraphrased to subjugate hate and bigotry in
today's society (Holier than thou).
2. We live in an infinite universe. More planets in the cosmos than grains of sand on Earth. Yet God sent his only son to save us from our sins, and
again, refer to man-made paraphrased subjective 'holy book' that preaches hatred, murder, etc to prove it.
It's okay to believe in religion, but if you're claiming Jesus is the truth you better accept ALL of his supposed 'holiness' as undeniable facts.
The ones where it says the punishment for working on Sabbath is death, ones where Moses orders his followers to murder in the name of him, God sending
a lion to maul a man to make a point, and the list goes on, and on, and on.
But please, by all means, continue your cherry-picking nature of using passages that you personally like. Just whatever you do, don't sit there and
claim ANY sort of truth when you have NONE.
It really is that simple. Your subjective interpretation to a book is not a truth.