It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LizardSlicks
Originally posted by ButterCookie
reply to post by poet1b
Well said, and yes. That is exactly my point!!
Negative, violent behavior should never be excused, no matter what color; in the Zimmerman case, blacks felt the need to excuse the assault by Trayvon, and this is a huge problem that is rarely addressed.
I cringed every time I heard, "He should have stayed in his car"...as if the young black male is an animal.
Sadly, lots of young black males have began to believe and behave like animals, and then are offended if this is said to them.
I shook my head tonight at the absurdity happening in various cities around the country in the name of 'Trayvon'..
Literally behaving like animals..The only difference is that the lions and such have enough common sense not to tear up the jungle.
George being an adult and an authority figure who presumably was coached/trained on how to handle such situations as a neighborhood watchman, should have presented himself to Trayvon as such. I doubt little more than an explanation as to what they were respectively doing from both involved would have resulted in such a scenario. In my opinion George absolutely failed in his duties as neighborhood watchman by not following appropriate protocol which led to confusion/fear on both sides and a fight resulted, not an assault. George happened to be getting the worse of it, which by his injuries were nowhere near life threatening or indicative of a struggle for his life. He was ill equipped mentally and physically to be the figure of authority that he fancied himself, couldn't assess the situation and react appropriately, and because of this a teenager that did not have to die for any reason is dead.
And there are lots of idiots, criminals of opportunity that will use anything as an excuse to cause mayhem and destruction. This is not a phenomenon exclusive to young black males.
Originally posted by Kashai
Yes under all circumstances we should kill anyone who we feel does not belong in neighborhood despite the fact they actually have every right to be their. A person who is responsible for making sure he knows who belongs in such a neighborhood.......
Should be freed because he killed a person who had ever right to be in that neighborhood
because he did not realize, that person actually was living in that neighborhood.
Sounds like a bunch of baloney to me.
Any thoughts?
edit on 16-7-2013 by Kashai because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by cavtrooper7
It was Zimmerman who stalked, DAMN the laws.If someone scares me I can track them and kill them if they resist? Bulls##t. Laws are protecting the nastiest creatures who ever walked in human skin right now. Wrong is wrong skin be DAMNED this is NOT the issue here,We are trying to stop mindless revenge,we get enough from our forefathers reckless policies we need to at least stop it here.
If you want it that bad then GET HELP you have an inferiority complex.
Originally posted by Jerk_Idiot
Originally posted by LizardSlicks
Originally posted by ButterCookie
reply to post by poet1b
Well said, and yes. That is exactly my point!!
Negative, violent behavior should never be excused, no matter what color; in the Zimmerman case, blacks felt the need to excuse the assault by Trayvon, and this is a huge problem that is rarely addressed.
I cringed every time I heard, "He should have stayed in his car"...as if the young black male is an animal.
Sadly, lots of young black males have began to believe and behave like animals, and then are offended if this is said to them.
I shook my head tonight at the absurdity happening in various cities around the country in the name of 'Trayvon'..
Literally behaving like animals..The only difference is that the lions and such have enough common sense not to tear up the jungle.
George being an adult and an authority figure who presumably was coached/trained on how to handle such situations as a neighborhood watchman, should have presented himself to Trayvon as such. I doubt little more than an explanation as to what they were respectively doing from both involved would have resulted in such a scenario. In my opinion George absolutely failed in his duties as neighborhood watchman by not following appropriate protocol which led to confusion/fear on both sides and a fight resulted, not an assault. George happened to be getting the worse of it, which by his injuries were nowhere near life threatening or indicative of a struggle for his life. He was ill equipped mentally and physically to be the figure of authority that he fancied himself, couldn't assess the situation and react appropriately, and because of this a teenager that did not have to die for any reason is dead.
And there are lots of idiots, criminals of opportunity that will use anything as an excuse to cause mayhem and destruction. This is not a phenomenon exclusive to young black males.
A few things wrong with what you said. Zimmerman had no uniform so he was NOT an authority figure. Second from the testimony there was no time to say who he was. Third having had my head pounded into a cement sidewalk may I do that to you so you have some personal experience to speak from about life threatening? Fourth why are you excusing Martin's own mistakes? He could have gone home, he could have called 911, he could have called his father. He had plenty of time. Why do you say it is all Zimmerman's fault? Why do you believe a young black man is so stupid that he could not have gone home or called for help on his phone? He had four minutes to go 30 yards to be home and safe. He chose otherwise. Do you forgive his poor choices because he was black? That would be racist of you if you do.
Originally posted by Kashai
So essentially it OK to kill someone in there own neighborhood because you as the neighborhoods watch captain have no idea they actually live their??????
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by LizardSlicks
reply to post by Jerk_Idiot
I don't think we're getting through to each other. What I meant was how society at large views the value of a black life. I understand that before some whites were willing to die for the cause, that black deaths for the cause were of no concern. What I am saying by "perception" is just because something can now get media attention, does not mean that society at large actually cares. The people that do express that they care about the life lost can now be heard because they are allowed to be angry at these things now without fearing their lives will shortly end violently, with no justice.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by Amagnon
I understand your point but she identified her race because it was pertinent to the topic.
edit on 013131p://bMonday2013 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)