Originally posted by yourmaker
I can't shake this feeling like they are using it, the trial and post-verdict, to learn how to categorize and identify threats better. Not
that they are even acting on the information they are collecting yet, but taking the time to learn the process better for the next big event
that might not be under their control.
What say you?
I'd have to think they're far beyond the point of merely categorizing and identifying perceived threats'. 's matter of fact know they are. FAR
IBM was tasked with designing/creating dime-size 2 gig hard drives for the NASA Space Shuttle Craft/Missions ....
way back in the... ****
no matter it be audio, video, email, txt, etc... the ability to monitor and filter each and every is not something 'in the works', it's been a
rather increasingly-capable long-standing ability.... language translation, too [for video/audio]
think about the ever increasing, more affordable storage drives, prices and the like.
now... ponder what's available under contract with required specifications...
.Gov contract, as well.
needless to say. yeah. they're far beyond simply categorizing, storing, filtering, etc.
profiling... would seem the mOar applicable terminology.
we run a search via google for a given phrase, term, etc.
we get results to businesses or venues of purchase or interest to what we're looking for.
they run a search, scan for a given phrase, terminology...
they get results of people who match set parameters, within the constraints set forth beforehand.
the facility in nevada or wherever, must simply be a situational backup data center for the one they've been using for years, nearing it's total
'capacity'. ! 'gotta cath it al. gotta catch it all'