Oh God, It's happening. Obama Already Talkin

page: 7
33
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 16 2013 @ 09:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by cry93
reply to post by ownbestenemy
 


And then he thought himself greater than he was, approached someone unneccessarily, and got his arse kicked. So he shot him.

Can I follow you without reason? And you are like okay, cry is following me and I have to be okay with this? Let me allow cry to follow me because I am innocent? BS.

I live in a reality based community and many of you screaming not illegal would feel threatened. Hell, your obesssion with Obama taking away gun rights without evidence is proof to me.


So you read minds?

Yes, you can "follow" someone in public, and it isn't a crime.

No, Mr, Zimmerman didn't approach; Martin did, and his own friend confirmed that in her testimony.

In reality, it's illegal to sucker punch a guy because you don't like his (perceived) race.




posted on Jul, 16 2013 @ 09:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by cry93
reply to post by bbracken677
 

This is not a political choice. It is reality.

This is not the Sudan. You do not need an assault rifles.


Really? Tell that to these guys -



Maybe if you ever actually read the Constitution and Bill of Rights, you would understand the reality. In this free country, you don't get to decide what sort of arms another person "needs".



posted on Jul, 17 2013 @ 01:34 AM
link   
reply to post by cry93
 


neither is the sedan the rockies with their mountains, hills and valleys, nor is the bleak alaskan territory. to live in a place where the criminal element runs rampant to their own end, where those who could not protect themselves from the elements, the wildlife, the criminal element, independancy from metropolis surely perished. too much attention has been payed to this incident leading one to think that this is one of or some of multiple agendas set forth by criminals in rogue elements of the government. believe whatever you will that one wouldn't need think of this hubris that because of a clear case of self defense we must give up the darwins self preservation mechanism in the human genome in the form of harnessing fire and steel for industrial, military, recreational, practical uses built to put jacketed lead where it needs to go. i find the concept of banning semi automatic assault rifles in this day and age impractical, reckless, de-evolutionary, and unsound. i'm just an ant speaking to a grasshopper these days



posted on Jul, 17 2013 @ 02:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by cry93
reply to post by 0001391
 


Who created this situation? TM was simply walking home to his father and brother.

2nd


Yes, simply walking home to his father and brother, until that racist decided to attack whitey. Too bad, so sad. At least the last few seconds of his life were lived knowing he really F'd up!



posted on Jul, 17 2013 @ 06:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by cry93
reply to post by bbracken677
 

This is not a political choice. It is reality.

This is not the Sudan. You do not need an assault rifles.


You realize, of course, that the so-called assault rifles (AR-15 and clones) are .22 caliber, right? You realize that the only difference between a so-called assault rifle and many other hunting rifles sold is the appearance, right? Oh...forgot, the hunting rifles are a larger caliber. Yes, they are available as semi-automatic.

We must ban rifles that look mean!! We must trample on the Constitution (this is the mantra of the current admin, apparently). After all, guns kill people, people don't kill people.

Also...we must!! divert attention away from the REAL problems in this country. Hence why Obama and the DOJ have been so intimately involved in the Trayvon/Zimmerman case even before the trial began. (Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!!)

I would rather we ban ignorance, but that is just impossible. Eh?



posted on Jul, 17 2013 @ 01:59 PM
link   
You know, I am not sure if it was brought up or not, but notice how he specifically says "gun violence"? Why not just violence? Is it OK to beat someone down? OK to stab someone? I wonder if that was intentional on his part.....



posted on Jul, 17 2013 @ 02:43 PM
link   
reply to post by TKDRL
 


You wonder?

really?

I don't..



posted on Jul, 17 2013 @ 04:25 PM
link   
i know right? it's like a dragnet epidose at the whitehouse



posted on Jul, 19 2013 @ 04:52 PM
link   
My sixteen year old friend killed himself because he thought he was a hard gangster. His dad was hard on him trying to straiten him out. Rap and hip hop culture consumed his young life, yet he was really just a coward...and a spoiled little actor who didn't know who he was yet.

It may sound crazy but what likely started out as true cultural expression in music, Hip Hop may have in some way been used to help speed up the spreading of inner city blight. The wave came through my neighborhood took that friend plus a few more...and now I am surrounded by renters and section eight. Was TM a foot soldier of some underground network? Scareing homeowners out of a particular neighborhood. could be conspiracy there..



posted on Jul, 19 2013 @ 06:05 PM
link   
Its really quite simple, you want to know what a tyrant is doing?

Take a look at what he is claiming his opponents are doing.


Oh,the reason he uses the term"gun violence" is to specifically link protecting oneself with aggression and to imply that any other sort of desire for self protection (for example, decrying the actions of the NSA),is treated as something to be prosecuted and stopped at all costs.





new topics
top topics
 
33
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join