It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PLASIFISK
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by PLASIFISK
Apparently not, at least not in the jury's mind.
How so. He claimed self defense.
It was self defense.
That's why he was found not guilty, in addition to not enough evidence to prove otherwise.
With that being said........ Follow, confront, fight, kill is legal!
Yes or no?
Originally posted by hounddoghowlie
Originally posted by RalagaNarHallas
state has to pay zimmermans legal fees and lawyer is talking about civil trials
i said a few page back george, is fixin to make millions off civil suits.
and i hope he breaks the records on amounts awarded.edit on 13-7-2013 by hounddoghowlie because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by joeym1991
The defining factor for me that Zimmerman should have at least gotten charged with manslaughter is ; In the 911 call the operator specifically told Zimmerman to break off pursuit, instead he continued to follow and CREATED the situation. Sad day in this country they let a killer,worthless pile of flesh who has nothing to offer to society but lurking around in the shadows pretending to be a cop preying on people he thinks might be weak. He picked the wrong kid because Treyvon Martin kicked his ass and because he was whooping him he happened to get bullet to the heart. RIP TREYVON[snip]edit on 13-7-2013 by elevatedone because: (no reason given)