It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.



page: 1

log in


posted on Jul, 13 2013 @ 08:57 PM
Is it possible to conceive of life without emotion? Whenever we do anything, were seemingly being led by emotion. If you're aware of this process, you'll acknowledge that we aren't in conceptual control of why we respond "this" way instead of "that" way. The very act of "choosing" is a different type of thinking altogether. When we move - when we get up - the manner of our walk around the house, or in public (if you aren't the self conscious type) is regulated by a type of being that has us being led by "charges" that come in and out without our conceptual awareness.

The psychologist Daniel Kahneman breaks the mind into two types: system 1 and system 2. System 1 is fast, automatic and intuitive. By it's very nature, system 1 thinking is emotional thinking. System 2 thinking, on the other hand, is slow, logical, analytic and methodological. But it too is subserved by emotion. Albeit, an emotion restrained by a self conscious mind.

It's only from the perspective of system 2 thinking that I am even able to make a thread about such a subject and discuss it's significance. But are most people able to conceive of life without emotion? In my experience, most people have trouble understanding the basic components involved in our day to day sense of being.

For example, it is a paradoxical fact that "embodied self awareness" - another term popular with modern psychologists - involves two directional opposites. Generally, when we speak or move, we are relating with some environment: some "object" "out there" in the world. When I say hi to someone, I am briefly immersed in another reality. Concurrent to this ontological immersion in the "other", is my feeling of an emotion. Typically, this is all were cognizant of. Emotion flies in and out - we say "hi, How are you? Long time no see" without considering the two parts involved in this psychological process. It is paradoxical that emotion and feeling - the essence of living - is so conceptually intertwined with engaging something other than ourselves.

People who have experienced intense shyness or anxiety in social situations can probably conceive of this process, but from another angle. The presence of new faces makes you feel uncomfortable; this discomfort is bad - to be feeling this way in front of others feels embarrassing. But what is embarrassment? Embarrassment is a concept that arises from a conceptually self aware mind. When the mind becomes aware of it's emotional discomfort, it leaves the experience of "feeling" (an ontologically different way of being) and enters the mode of "thinking". It begins to ruminate and brood about it's discomfort. In this new situation, because the mind is no longer completely absorbed in it's environment, but has become anxiously involved with it's own internal feelings vis a vis an external impetus - it can no longer feel and connect with it's true self. The self paradoxically requires the mediation of the environment, the world, the "other", in order to most feel itself.

Another person graced with an ability to sense this reality are people with PTSD. Of course, PTSD is mostly bad. But it does provide advantages by making the mind more sensitive to the interoceptive terrain of the human psyche. PTSD tends to create a condition called "dissociation", or hypo-emotionality. In short, people with PTSD are afraid of experiencing intense emotions. For understandable reasons, even an intense positive emotion reminds them of the vulnerability they experienced during the originating trauma.

When an animal is about to be killed, the bodies fight or flight chemicals (adrenaline, gluco-cortisoids) are replaced by endogenous opiates released by a region in the brain stem called the periaquaductal grey. In order to "numb" the pain of being eaten by another animal, the opiates create a dissociation effect that inhibits the minds ability to "feel" it's body or its emotions. Unfortunately, this mechanism which has such obvious evolutionary value is also the main cause of post traumatic stress disorder. After experiencing trauma, the persons nervous system over-responds by releasing huge amounts of endogenous opiates, preventing the person from fully experiencing the event. This is important because parasympathetic restoration is only possible after the mind fully experiences sympathetic arousal. For some unknown reason, some people simply do not respond this way. Their nervous systems seem to be acutely sensitive to certain emotional experiences, preventing the body from feeling parasympathetic restoration. This means that the trauma becomes "frozen" in them.

In any case, being hypo-emotional i.e. having very low emotional arousal, enables someone to parse and analyze the components involved in basic human relations. It can also help one better appreciate the unfathomable nature of emotion.

Trauma is feeling intense emotion. People with PTSD fear the vulnerability of this state; ergo, they fear emotional arousal. What can this teach us about emotion? When emotion is present, the conscious mind, the "I", is temporally absent. It is not aware of it's experiencing emotion, but rather, is involved with the "object" that emotions spurs it towards. Emotion means not being in control. In effect: Life, living, means sacrificing our need to be in control. I think this is the meaning. Life is a process, as Carl Rogers was fond of saying. In it's deepest possible sense, were pulled along into a motion and current which seems to be completely beyond our conscious ability to control. We can't predict or anticipate our emotional arousal. If we did, we would in effect be impeding the flow of emotion.

posted on Jul, 13 2013 @ 10:04 PM
reply to post by Astrocyte

Emotion is necessary for humanity's most valued traits. Every virtue we hold dear is dependent upon emotion. It's as simple as that.
edit on 13-7-2013 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)

posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 02:08 AM
reply to post by AfterInfinity

Emotions are both a blessing and a curse.

They are a blessing in the sense that they can aid us in building long and meaningful relationships, as well as leading us to achieve our most treasured virtues.

On the other hand, emotions cloud our minds and force us to suspend logic and reason at the cost of what's the best outcome for the situation.

The key is to balance your emotions; allow them to guild you toward positive outcomes and build strong relationships, but do not allow them to dominate your thought processes when making important decisions.

new topics

log in