It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

ET structure on Moon

page: 11
80
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 01:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kashai
Sure after you prove the lunar surface could actually generate such and event


What event? There was no event on the moon surface, so I take it you do not actually have any maths, as expected.




posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 01:53 AM
link   
reply to post by Kashai
 


The more you type, the more obvious your lack of education becomes.



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 01:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by raifordko
reply to post by Kashai
 


The more you type, the more obvious your lack of education becomes.


The more you type the more you make it obvious you have no data to support your position.

It would be silly to conclude that given the theoretical amount of dispersion (1 thousand to one, one million to one, one billion to one) that you think you should be taken seriously.

Like I said if you believe that there is some really great land west of Miami that you would really love. I will even give you a break only 1 thousand per acre.

edit on 14-7-2013 by Kashai because: added content



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 02:01 AM
link   
reply to post by Kashai
 


Wait? My position that this isn't a nuclear explosion? I have a picture. Not my fault you are you are seeing stuff that isn't there. The burden of proof isn't on me. That's not how science works. You made a claim. Prove it.



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 02:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by raifordko
reply to post by Kashai
 


Wait? My position that this isn't a nuclear explosion? I have a picture. Not my fault you are you are seeing stuff that isn't there. The burden of proof isn't on me. That's not how science works. You made a claim. Prove it.


Wrong you also made a claim this being your "picture". Prove that as I already understand that you cannot.

Meanwhile there is no real reason to claim my point does not have merit.
edit on 14-7-2013 by Kashai because: added content



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 02:04 AM
link   
reply to post by Kashai
 


At this point you are just embarrassing yourself.



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 02:06 AM
link   
reply to post by Kashai
 


We've already proven it is an artifact of the imaging process. You've chosen to ignore the evidence.



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 02:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by raifordko
reply to post by Kashai
 


At this point you are just embarrassing yourself.


Based upon what your inability to prove your point?

Again at least my point could very well make sense.
edit on 14-7-2013 by Kashai because: modifed content



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 02:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kashai
Again at least my point could very well make sense.


Your refusal to show us the maths you claimed to have proves your point makes no sense at all.



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 03:07 AM
link   
This is an exceptional find and the OP is quite correct with the title for if the feature was on this planet it would be called 'terrestrial'.

As for what we are seeing in the image, my own view is that is a very large pipe which has a transparent shield around it. There are branches of smaller pipes attached which seem to disappear downwards into the darker area. On each branch there appears to be a collar between the main pipe and the shield where the smaller pipes are attached to the main pipe. Not only that, as was pointed out earlier, the pipe continues and can be seen further up in the image with another branch attached.

What could the very bright feature be?

If the object is a very large pipe, which I think it is, there can only be a couple of explanations. It is either a discharge of water and the rays from the sun are reflecting from it or a gas of some description that has ignited. I do not believe it is a camera glitch, lightning or a plasma discharge as the long object definitely seems connected to the terrain. The object may help to establish the possibility that there could well be an active presence on the lunar surface. Who these 'people' may be and where they came from is an important topic for another thread?

Here is a lightened view of the dark area further up the main image. It would appear that there are two of these pipe-like features running parallel to each other. The image below shows the branch from one of the long objects.



edit on 14-7-2013 by arianna because: additional text and image



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 03:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by CosmicQuest
Apollo 16 photo archive, shows a clear image of what looks like a power plant or possibly an alien spacecraft on the surface of our moon
The structure seems to be generating or attracting a plume of pure energy


I think it looks like a valley and mountain, with a city inside of it, and that is the way in and out.



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 03:19 AM
link   
This is my first post here, Hello ATS, I logged in just to comment on this because I think it's interesting
The picture looks like a portal possibly opening and light, or a spaceship going in or out. I do agree that it does look like lightning or some kind of electrical voltage from a source.



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 03:34 AM
link   
reply to post by arianna
 


Oh man, did I totally call someone would say they were conduits...predicting what crazies will do is so easy these days.



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 04:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by raifordko
Oh man, did I totally call someone would say they were conduits...predicting what crazies will do is so easy these days.


That's really immature ...

And claiming this anomaly is just a product of the imaging process, and then go onto argue about some maths ...is about as childish as it gets.



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 04:02 AM
link   
As I see it...as it is definitely not TERRESTIAL...it must therefore be EXTRA-TERRESTIAL....not spacemen, nor grays...just not Earthly...

You just cant in any way prove it is any type of "structure"....nor prove the contrary. Or that it is "alien" related.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Youre up next....



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 04:26 AM
link   
Why are so many naive people immediately pointing toward the "ET" label as if it's mislabeled, and ending their contributions there? Obviously it most certainly IS "ET," considering the T in ET stands for Terrestrial, meaning Earth based. If it's on the moon, and not on Earth, it's not Terrestrial.

I guess I just don't understand why you people are so inclined to argue such a moot point, as opposed to arguing the actual topic at hand? If you don't agree with the OP's opinion, just say so. Wrongfully complaining about the title just makes you look unintelligent.

Cheers,
-Nos



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 05:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by Spacespider
I enhanced it the best I could..
Incredible, I wonder what it could be, almost look like lightning surrounding a alien craft



Looks electro-magnetic to me, but i'd say photoshop is the safest bet.



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 05:15 AM
link   
reply to post by CosmicQuest
 


What awesome anomaly.... connected to another anomaly in the same Area....Cable connected on the Moon

Something suspicious up there...

S&F.



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 06:44 AM
link   
everybody look at this. this explains it

explanation

everybody look at this everybody look at this everybody look at this everybody look at this

2/3 down the page.
edit on 14/7/13 by SecretKnowledge because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 14 2013 @ 07:15 AM
link   
reply to post by SecretKnowledge
 


I am sorry SecretKnowldge, but I cannot agree with you in this case. I do not think that what we are seeing is a discharge of static electricity during the photographic process. Notice that this particular feature cannot be seen in other areas of the image except for showing in this particular area. I refer to one of the paragraphs I posted above.

>

If you lighten the image you will notice there are two of these large pipe-like features running parallel to each other across and under the terrain. I can assure members and visitors there are plenty of very interesting objects and features to observe on the moon that most people would consider unexplainable but knowing what we are being led to believe this does not surprise me in the slightest.


edit on 14-7-2013 by arianna because: text

edit on 14-7-2013 by arianna because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
80
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join