This topic is in the Board Business & Questions discussion forum.  (rss)


IMPORTANT: Signatures and Signature Abuse...


<<  1    2    3  >>



reply posted on 9-11-2004 @ 10:11 PM by kinglizard



Originally posted by DClark
Is mine too large? please say no.



I'm afraid the total file size is way too big, each flag is 6.52k. The total can be no larger than 25k.

[Edited on 10-11-2004 by kinglizard]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-11-2004 @ 10:07 AM by JAK


This does mean that these:

external image

Stoopid things are not allowed yes? RESULT!!

Jack



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-11-2004 @ 10:11 AM by kinglizard


Yeah that sig is too tall, almost 100 pixels.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-11-2004 @ 02:57 PM by deeprivergal


So have all signatures been removed then? I am noticing that I can't see anyone's signature anymore.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-11-2004 @ 03:23 PM by EnronOutrunHomerun



Originally posted by deeprivergal
So have all signatures been removed then? I am noticing that I can't see anyone's signature anymore.

That's b/c SO has it in low-bandwith mode...

The blue text one very page that reads "Due to high traffic, ATS is functioning in low-bandwidth/low-impact mode. Some features are disabled" is when you know that's what's going on...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-11-2004 @ 06:45 PM by DClark


Ok, it should be small enough now.

If someone that knows a lot about gifs wants to help. I need to know how I can reduce the size of the flags and keep the animation. Thanks.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-11-2004 @ 04:54 PM by Deimos


I agree with the change, i'm glad the admins are finally putting their foot down.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2004 @ 05:59 PM by stoneskull


hear hear.

big flashy signatures saying 'read my blog! read my blog!' aren't very flattering anyway, you know.

here's a letter to the bloggers me mate wrote. made me spit out my coffee.

good one ats.. i can almost hear the big sigh of relief echoing through the forum halls.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-11-2004 @ 10:15 PM by Ravenna


That reminds me. I haven't got a siggy ! Time to rectify that I think.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-1-2005 @ 07:49 AM by damefool


*Chinese bow*

can anyone tell me if my signature or my avatar is too big?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-1-2005 @ 08:03 AM by instar



Originally posted by damefool
*Chinese bow*

can anyone tell me if my signature or my avatar is too big?


I dont think so. I like it, ying/yang right?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-1-2005 @ 08:08 AM by damefool



Originally posted by instar

Originally posted by damefool
*Chinese bow*

can anyone tell me if my signature or my avatar is too big?


I dont think so. I like it, ying/yang right?


Thanks *bows again*

any comment on my signature. It's Tao or Taoism in Chinese.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-1-2005 @ 09:35 AM by kinglizard



Originally posted by damefool
any comment on my signature.


It's nice but too big. The maximum height is 50 pixels, yours is 85. Here is a resized version for you.




reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-1-2005 @ 09:43 AM by damefool



Originally posted by kinglizard

Originally posted by damefool
any comment on my signature.


It's nice but too big. The maximum height is 50 pixels, yours is 85. Here is a resized version for you.




Thanks Mr. kinglizard *double chinese bow*

You are too kind...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-1-2005 @ 11:07 AM by drunk



Originally posted by bigdanprice
is this one too big? I can sort it if it is?


"It's me a lady Emily Howard"



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2007 @ 11:22 AM by bodrul


skeptic since your online could you tell me if my sig breaks terms and conditions
and how they break the terms and conditions



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2007 @ 11:24 AM by kinglizard


No need, I already sent you an explanation....



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2007 @ 11:37 AM by bodrul



Originally posted by kinglizard
No need, I already sent you an explanation....


yes very fast indeed
so i can expect the same treatment for others correct?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2007 @ 11:41 AM by kinglizard



Originally posted by bodrul
yes very fast indeed
so i can expect the same treatment for others correct?


You can expect to be held responsible your your own account....stop pointing fingers....



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2007 @ 11:43 AM by bodrul



Originally posted by kinglizard
You can expect to be held responsible your your own account....stop pointing fingers....


i am purely stating the ovious
i am just requesting that you also look at others which is fair

edit: funny enough i found most mods are breaking this rule

and yes i take responsibility for my account
so i have amended that

[edit on 9-7-2007 by bodrul]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:















































ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.107 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread
Forums Directory