God Save the Future Queen of England, the spirit of Diana will come back again!

a reply to: The angel of light

Since you got things wrong, any future predictions you end up being correct on will just be you being luckier. That's all. I don't see a reason that a TRUE seer would ever be wrong on his predictions.

originally posted by: boymonkey74
Well done op You failed with your fitst prediction and moved the goal posts and now say you have predicted this new baby.
Well it was 50/50 to get the sex right.
Oh great sage tell us more of the future...will the sun rise tomorrow? .

I am still waiting for that short term prediction that Angel of Lightness says is so much easier to do......but the sun rising would fit right in line with what I am expecting.....

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Let me try! Someone will die somewhere on the planet tomorrow.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Really? where were the other William and other Harry among the current dinasty that inspired Prince Charles and Princess Diana to give such names to their children?

Please read History before to try to teach traditions.

Thanks,

The Angel of Lightness

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Sorry KraxyshOt,

with all respect you would be the last person in ATS somebody might look to get qualification or License of Seer, that is very well know by everybody here.

The day you predict something more unlikely to occur than what correspond to the cycles of nature please come back again to talk.

Thanks,

The Angel of Lightness

a reply to: The angel of light

Well someone should do it, because we have people like you that can't admit when they are wrong pretending to be one.

ETA: I'm not much of a gambler so betting against the odds isn't my style.

Please, just don't saddle this poor little girl with such a legacy in so many ways. Let her grow up to be her own self with no preconceived notion beyond the gentle tribute paid to her grandmother.

originally posted by: The angel of light
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Really? where were the other William and other Harry among the current dinasty that inspired Prince Charles and Princess Diana to give such names to their children?

Please read History before to try to teach traditions.

Thanks,

The Angel of Lightness

Ok....maybe YOU should read up a bit.....so Harry is a nickname. His actual name is Henry Charles Albert David....do I really need to go into the history of Henry's that are royal?

William also had a long history of royals in his name.....here is the William part:

Named by his father after Prince William of Gloucester, son of Charles's great-uncle, the Duke of Gloucester. A licensed pilot, William died in 1972 while competing in the Goodyear International Air Trophy race.

Not that this post even deserved a response, but I still have yet to see one from you on my questions so I will continue to respond to your nonsense.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

This is funny, when you want to criticize others posts you claim that only one name counts more than others to say if it was guessed by chance or truly predicted, but when I expose you openly you come here mentioning the entire list of names.

Well, even Henry is not more common among the current Hannover-Windsor-Mountabatten house than Harry and the same can be said of William or Arthur, since one thing is to be a Prince of England and another one to the be first or second in the line of succession. Anyway the last William in that family was even Not among the generation of the Queen or Prince Charles.

By the way I disagree also with you in that the likelihood to be called Charlotte was not easy to "guess" , if my task was to guess it would possibly even easier to get than Elizabeth, for the simple reason that the Grand Father is named Charles, and it is definitely hundred of times more probable than Diana, since we all know how difficult was the relationship of the last Princess of Wales with her husband's family, in spite of all her outstanding human virtues.

Thanks,

The Angel of Lightness

a reply to: ketsuko

I think Ketsuto your post is possibly the only really relevant and respectful to arrive here, after all we are talking about just a baby, and that is the reason for which I decide to remain silent about many things to come.

Now, you are also right Certainly it is several times more relevant to have another Princess named Diana after all what happened with the her Grand Mother than what ever other name she can have in addition.

Now, something pretty interesting is that this Princess of Cambridge is arriving with a name of not one but two Queens in waiting of the past that died young and when no body expected it was going to occur, even before to be really in the Throne although with all the right to arrive to it.

The Last Princess Chalotte in the current Dynasty was the Princess of Wales of 1815 who died delivering a boy, being so much young, only 21.

This is a really strange coincidence, remarkable indeed, two charismatic Princesses of Wales of the past that died still young preceded this girl in two of her names.

This thread since the beginning talks about a new female member of the Royal family that might be in some way arriving like the reincarnation of somebody of the Past, a person that in the past was Princess of Wales, so again this another rare synchronicity.

en.wikipedia.org...

Thanks,

The Angel of Lightness

Thing iis op how many failed prophecy threads have we seen on ats? Hundreds including this one.
I have seen one thread which had a prediction which came true and even then it was a pretty easy thing to predict.
Sorry but from experience so called prophets are either insane ir charlatans.
Which one are you?.

a reply to: The angel of light

Now, the fact that she is named Diana is several times more unlikely to occur,

Rubbish!....her Grandmother was called Diana!.....if and when William and Kate had a girl it was always going to have Diana in it's name!

And the kids called Charlotte by the way.

a reply to: Argyll

Sorry Angyl, you arrived late to the party of my well known foes, but just to don't look impolite with you let me remark that it has been a great gesture of Gratitude to the great woman was Princess of Wales Diana Spencer , but moreover of Courage the one of Prince William to name her girl after his Mother in spite of all the terrible tense relationship she had with the Windsor Family.

In this aspect William has acted with great Moral height, his decision is not political at all, and I think it will gain for him even more sympathy than the one he has already among the British People. He was smart enough, cautious and diplomatic into put Diana after 2 names that are pleasant to his paternal family, but what it counts is that he is giving a homage to his Mother in his own daughter.

Thanks,

The Angel of Lightness

originally posted by: The angel of light
a reply to: Vasa Croe

This is funny, when you want to criticize others posts you claim that only one name counts more than others to say if it was guessed by chance or truly predicted, but when I expose you openly you come here mentioning the entire list of names.

Well, even Henry is not more common among the current Hannover-Windsor-Mountabatten house than Harry and the same can be said of William or Arthur, since one thing is to be a Prince of England and another one to the be first or second in the line of succession. Anyway the last William in that family was even Not among the generation of the Queen or Prince Charles.

By the way I disagree also with you in that the likelihood to be called Charlotte was not easy to "guess" , if my task was to guess it would possibly even easier to get than Elizabeth, for the simple reason that the Grand Father is named Charles, and it is definitely hundred of times more probable than Diana, since we all know how difficult was the relationship of the last Princess of Wales with her husband's family, in spite of all her outstanding human virtues.

Thanks,

The Angel of Lightness

Wrong. When picking names, royalty tries to use names in the past lineage. It is a normal thing. To say Diana and Elizabeth were some great prediction is ridiculous. That speculation, if it were a girl at the time of your prediction, was all over the place....bets were being placed on it because it was a likely name.

Well...while Charlotte MAY have been easy for you to guess, you DID NOT guess it.....you didn't even guess the correct sex of the child.....

Last generation? So now YOU, of all people, are putting date references on things? That is laughable.....let me know when you actually predict something correctly. As of yet, not a single one of your threads has come to fruition.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Dear Vasa Croe,

A month a go I felt that your comments were really hilarious when you tried without success to find the exact date of death of a some statesman of another Island that of course I never mentioned at all to try to post another of your pathetic critics, but now I am starting to feel pity of you, you have arrived to the point of reaching the limit of the no sense, every time that you try to improve your critics you fall even below in the level of your credibility.

I gave in this thread since September 2013 the exact gender of this baby although the web was crowed of posts of all the agencies saying that even the parents preferred to don't know it until the time of birth.

I gave since the opening post two out of the three names of this baby and along the last month when many agencies were saying that Diana was the most unlikely of the names that were competing in the polls, for the problems of the past in between the Princess of Wales and the Royal family, I insisted that it was going to be picked up.

The polls for the name of the new baby after the gender was disclosed were leaded by names of Alexandra and Alice, so technically Diana was considered less probable than them by the majority of the public.

www.huffingtonpost.com...

In other polls not only Alexandra or Alice well ahead, but even Victoria or Olivia had more votes than Elizabeth or Diana,

community.babycentre.co.uk...

www.mirror.co.uk...

Now, I also pointed accurately since two years before her birth that this girl's since birth would evoke a former Princess of Wales and happen that she is now named after two former Princess of Wales.

Please look for job , you need it, I am patient but I am so much busy to continue dealing with your over reactions, it is clear that you are obsessed with my threads. I never have gone to your threads to ask for your opinion of nothing, but you are the one that feels a morbid need to post replies for which nobody would pay nothing on mines.

Thanks,

The Angel of Lightness

a reply to: The angel of light

I gave in this thread since September 2014 the exact gender of this baby

You say this like there were more than two possibilities

the "exact gender".... boy or girl.

ask 100 people and about half will get it right, does that mean they have mystical powers to predict such things.... no.

if you gave the exact time of birth, then you might have been on to something

Honestly OP please just stop with this, quite frankly its embarrassing.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Well Dear OtherSideOfTheCoin,

Certainly I confirmed on June of 2014 that the baby was going to be a girl, but I expressed openly my suspicion of that fact since September of 2013, so 9 months before that date, here in this same thread and in response to some criticism of another member.

Posted September 6 2013 @ 01:46 PM 2013th , by the Angel of Lightness,

The point is not the baby, but which one? As I told before William and Katy can have a daughter in the future,

Moreover, although in the opening post clearly I said that she was going to be named Elizabeth and Diana, in a post of April 8th of this year I clarified that Diana was not going to be the first name, and I even suggested the it would be more likely her third one.

posted on Apr, 8 2015 @ 05:39 PM Posted by the Angel of Lightness

How can be named this new member of the Royal Family? well one thing is sure it is very likely that Diana will be among her multiple names, but even if it is not her first name , just the second of third, to preserve the appearances and try to don't create a bad reaction in the very high Royal circles, that is absolutely secondary since the people will soon start to call her for that name that is remembered with a lot of enthusiasm and love in England.

That was the time in which the gender remained unknown and many people were biding money that it will be named James!

Thanks,

The Angel of Lightness

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Well Dear OtherSideOfTheCoin,

Here it is my post on June of 2014, when there were a lot of speculations, that never passed the limit of mere rumors and before the Royal house started to publish in all the Media that the actual gender of the Baby was not known even by the parents.

June 2014, @ 10:29 PM Posted by the Angel of Lightness,

This girl is predestinated to have a role at future that will overflow all the expectations, and although she is arriving the second as a member of a new Generation of Windsors, will soon gain the favoritism among the people, as it was with her homonym Grand mother.

I don't have nothing to feel embarrassed by the way, maybe the people that lost money biding for to name her Alexandra, Alice, Victoria or Olive perhaps.

Thanks,

The Angel of Lightness

a reply to: The angel of light
I believe what the forum are trying to point out to you, when your original posts are incorrect you adapt / manipulate later posts. In your two responses above you are referencing your later posts rather than your original post to justify your prediction, when the point several contributors are making is your Original Post. We were all in the UK aware it was a girl and that the names Diana and Elizabeth would be included, just as the entire majority predicted Charlotte would be the first name. You choose to dismiss your statements with admendments (that's your choice). Clearly all your predictions are well researched, I notice you reference probability as you indicate with possible names in this thread or football teams in the World Cup thread and that's what your posts are probability. Keeping this reader entertained (especially your faux Shakespeare English) thank you.

A

a reply to: kazryll

Well kazryll,

I have told in multiple occasions that prophecy or omens or any other kind of intuition that is based on psychic foreseeing of the future is not the same art like forecasting weather.

The perception of time while the mind is on trance, that is the way the subconscious reach other time planes, and perceive their respective causal lines, is not the same than when living in the conscious level.

This is the same reason for which many people became sometimes disappointed waiting for the accomplishment of prophecies that were long time ago formulated, by well tested famous prophets or seers.

It took 1000 years to see the arrival of Jesus, although it is clear that David his ancestor predicted his arrival in the Psalms, it took centuries to see many of the most famous predictions of Nostradamus to became facts ( The French revolution, Napoleon Rule, WWI, WWII, The attack to the world trade center).

I remember to have read that although it is clear that Jean Dixon predicted in 1956 the election of JFK and his ulterior assassination, she also told to some journalists in 1960 that Richard Nixon once would be President of this Country. Many later claimed that she was manipulating her own predictions, but the fact is that she was accurate both politicians were elected and ruled.

Now in 1973 Jean Dixon , as a personal adviser of President Richard Nixon , who never forgot her election prediction, told to him that America clearly at future would suffer terrorist Arab attacks in its mainland. Many called Dixon a fake when that didn't happen in that 1970s, but as a matter of fact she was the only American psychic that expected an Islamic fundamentalist attack of the characteristics of Sept 11th 2001 almost 30 years in advance.

I perfectly and discretely could drop this thread for ever, letting it to be forgotten, assuming that it was a failed prediction, anyway I have a lot successful ones that I didn't need this in particular in my records. However, in the same week that Prince George was born I again had a vision that showed a girl coming after him that was going to be called Diana.

The Dukes of Cambridge might never have had this girl, and when I started to talk about her there was a lot of skepticism to believe that the house of Windsor would even accept that idea to call again any new member of the family Diana, for many reasons, but moreover for her divorce from Prince Charles that was extremely difficult to handle and represented a major political crisis when it happened.

Pls read:
www.thewire.com...

www.huffingtonpost.com...

news.yahoo.com...

Of course after her birth a lot of people started to change their minds and support the name Diana, but about two years ago I was a very lonely voice in the dessert predicting her arrival.


Did I manipulate anything when my prediction of the election of President Obama became successful? or on his reelection one?,
How about the arrival of the great recession with a year in advance, where was the trick on that ?
or when I posted that we were going to see a Pope coming from other Continent and speaking a Romance language, different than Latin, as his mother tongue?
How about the abdication of King Juan Carlos of Spain?,
or when I did so with the defeat of President Sarkozy by the socialists?,
or the earthquake of Charlotte Island in Canada?
How about the volcanic eruption of in Alaska?
or the Tohoku earthquake in Japan?
and the war in between Russia and Georgia that no nobody expected to erupt when I started to talk on it?
My threads were talking about the sudden apparition of the terrible ISIS conflict in middle east in times when Syria was not even in civil war, where was the manipulation on that?.

All the records of these accomplished predictions are here in ATS, available and open to the most rigorous and careful inspection. One accomplished forecast can be coincidence but not so many.

Thanks for your compliments about my Shakespearean English, I received British education in my early years by the way, although that was really long time ago you are quite right, I read almost all his Dramas in the School.

Thanks for your reply,

The Angel of Lightness