It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Wow. How deep. Kiddie-pool deep. And badly written. Maybe that's where miscommunication comes into play? Certainly we're not on your--"and one or two others"--level. Surprising you'd hang out here to mentally massage yourself rather than communicate. Having said that, brings me to this:
But let's don't take it beyond the reality that we so far face. Linguistic "nihilism" makes no sense, nor can it be supported. That's both pretentious and silly. Without verbal communication we'd most likely be more screwed and chaotic than we are today.
"We're gonna invent a superior form of communication but it's secret." WHAT?
We CAN communicate beyond the limitations some might assert. Who hasn't lain across from their lover and poured their heart out and had their "message" received in full? Was it all verbal? No. Does it negate it's power? No. Was it ESP? No.
Don't sell humanity short. If one does, maybe that reflects more on their own personal limitations than the perceived limitations of language?
Until some group actually somehow, using language to invent antilanguage, finds a way to usher in some kind of ESP that supersedes our verbal and body language, it's just pseudo-intellectual masturbation.
When it's guised in violent images and code...don't whine when folk take note and ask questions.
lostgirl
galadofwarthethird
reply to post by lostgirl
Your confused, and I am a dude. And yes the FL people do have an agenda, they mentioned it a few times on this thread. The question is, what is your definition of nefarious agendas? I seriously doubt you could even interpret there site or even if its meant to be interpreted, for all you know it could just be mambo jumbo, but really what is the agenda?
Now, since you seem to go on about it. What is it that you think is there agenda. You said you put hours and lots of time into it you should be able to state it pretty clearly and hopefully withing a few paragraphs or preferably sentences. Why not go on and say it? And if not now as things are as thick as syrup right now, at a latter time when you can think more clearly. But yes what is it you think I am about since you seem to think I have one of these so called agendas, and what is it you think is the agenda of the FL people.
You know what, dont bother you probably linked it in this thread somewhere. Though I am not going to be wasting time going through all this # to look it up, I may some other day.
First, I never said anything remotely implying that I thought 'you' had an agenda...? And I never said that I knew "what" the FL agenda actually was, only that they must surely have a negative one.
Second, you do not have to understand the languages to figure out the gist of their writings, because many of them have sections in English mixed in with the other language plus the bibliographies are in English, so you can search the books and scientific research papers they used in compiling their reports and get a very clear idea what they are writing about.....
Now, how did I come to my conclusions? See below:
They have created a 'language' (Cassini Diskus) which is intended specifically to use sound to communicate thoughts, ideas, and, at this point feelings, into people's minds by embedding said sounds into music and then transmitting it in either of two frequencies - described in the following direct quote from Direne - a confirmed representative of the site:
"On frequencies: 27Hz is a high beta brainwave associated with anxiety and compulsive behavior. 12 Ghz has to do with sonochemistry (inducing chemical reaction using sound)."
There is legitimate documentation showing that FL has a research branch which is directly linked to the experimental research area (Darpa/psy-ops) of the U.S. government...
They were caught in a lie denying this, as well as lying about the group having no patents on inventions (they have at least 20).
Does any of this sound 'less' than nefarious to you?
Now, I am not going to outline for you the process of checking and cross checking (hours and hours) that I went thru to reach these conclusions, because that would take even more hours and hours, but the information is all either in specific posts in the thread or linked (to 'official documentation') within these posts...
Plus there are a few highly esteemed members of the site who can attest that I never make assertions without thorough investigation of legitimate sources.
eDom: norming software and relative meaning frequencies for 544 English homonyms.
Words that are homonyms-that is, for which a single written and spoken form is associated with multiple, unrelated interpretations, such as COMPOUND, which can denote an or a meaning-are an invaluable class of items for studying word and discourse comprehension. When using homonyms as stimuli, it is critical to control for the relative frequencies of each interpretation, because this variable can drastically alter the empirical effects of homonymy. Currently, the standard method for estimating these frequencies is based on the classification of free associates generated for a homonym, but this approach is both assumption-laden and resource-demanding. Here, we outline an alternative norming methodology based on explicit ratings of the relative meaning frequencies of dictionary definitions. To evaluate this method, we collected and analyzed data in a norming study involving 544 English homonyms, using the eDom norming software that we developed for this purpose. Dictionary definitions were generally sufficient to exhaustively cover word meanings, and the methods converged on stable norms with fewer data and less effort on the part of the experimenter. The predictive validity of the norms was demonstrated in analyses of lexical decision data from the English Lexicon Project (Balota et al., Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445-459, 2007), and from Armstrong and Plaut (Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2223-2228, 2011). On the basis of these results, our norming method obviates relying on the unsubstantiated assumptions involved in estimating relative meaning frequencies on the basis of classification of free associates. Additional details of the norming procedure, the meaning frequency norms, and the source code, standalone binaries, and user manual for the software are available at edom.cnbc.cmu.edu... .
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
First, I never said anything remotely implying that I thought 'you' had an agenda...? And I never said that I knew "what" the FL agenda actually was, only that they must surely have a negative one.
They have created a 'language' (Cassini Diskus) which is intended specifically to use sound to communicate thoughts, ideas, and, at this point feelings, into people's minds by embedding said sounds into music and then transmitting it in either of two frequencies - described in the following direct quote from Direne - a confirmed representative of the site:
"On frequencies: 27Hz is a high beta brainwave associated with anxiety and compulsive behavior. 12 Ghz has to do with sonochemistry (inducing chemical reaction using sound)." There is legitimate documentation showing that FL has a research branch which is directly linked to the experimental research area (Darpa/psy-ops) of the U.S. government...
They were caught in a lie denying this, as well as lying about the group having no patents on inventions (they have at least 20). Does any of this sound 'less' than nefarious to you?
Now, I am not going to outline for you the process of checking and cross checking (hours and hours) that I went thru to reach these conclusions, because that would take even more hours and hours, but the information is all either in specific posts in the thread or linked (to 'official documentation') within these posts... Plus there are a few highly esteemed members of the site who can attest that I never make assertions without thorough investigation of legitimate sources.
But yes so what nefarious things have these FL people and darpa done. They build bomb's which can destroy whole cities, they have gasses which can knock off whole towns, and all kinds of weapons and things were invented which are out there everyday both for good and bad making life's better and others worse every day.
will admit it right here and right now: I HAVE AN AGENDA< PER THIS THREAD TONIGHT The agenda I have is: I am sick and tired, (yes i really said that, sick and tired) of the deflection of two participants on this thread, who at every turn, seem to deflect us all from further investigation as to FL, by obfuscating and personal argumentative mannerisms....and it's gone on for some sixty or so pages......continual obfuscation and deflecting so we can't really talk or speak to the real issue....it's become very obvious..... And I think this is an important enough topic to risk being banned for calling you both out on that, confronting it, so that some truth gets through the pipeline on this website, their endeavors, and agenda....for it will affect my grandchildren, and many other people. And I am no fan of DARPA, and the minute we start to link up anything significant there are two members who show up with predictable assaults, AND, I, FOR ONE, HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF THIS......
galadofwarthethird
reply to post by Eidolon23
So says the member of the troll squad.
Get over yourself and though I like you. Your nowhere near as smart as you think you are.
Happy1
reply to post by tetra50
I would like to say that if you are not the OP of a thread, you shouldn't have to reply to every, single person who challenges you - I have learned that there are some people who post, I don't even bother to read - just skip it - one knows exactly what they are going to say - and it doesn't add to the much knowledge gained from people's posts I always read.
And they just waste a lot of space in the threads.
Please - continue to teach me and give me info, those of you who are not sabotagist (is that even a word?) saboteurs.
The GUT
Nah, we only know bits and pieces of the "hows" and the "whys" of occultic knowledge/abilities. Depends on who you mean by "we." You, me, or the MK-ULTRA adepts? I seriously doubt you or I understand the depth of that arcane knowledge. For anyone that thinks they do, however, I EAGERLY await that thread.
The GUT
Regardless, the historical gist of the occult realm is control. Magic(k) in the supernatural sense is NOT required. Power is the aim.
The GUT
" If you follow his line of reasoning, there is a great deal of validity in what he says, although it is not what we are seeking at this time. We need to make the definition of magick a bit longer: Magick is the science and art of causing change (in consciousness) to occur in conformity with will, using means not currently understood by traditional Western science."
The GUT
Naturally then, it doesn't negate, or somehow supersede, the known and unknown, ahem, "laws" of science. But it does bring to mind its potential for prostitution...and the willingness of certain folk to do so.
see I've read pages of this stuff, and in the process, we've sort of gotten to know each other, haven't we...just by our interaction here. DARPA does not build bombs, as I know you well know. They are far more interested in weaponizing information....and unfortunately, you have exhibited this on this thread. You, and Brotherman, pretend to be dumb, when convenient.....and when someone's posting some pertinent info.......and then the game becomes deflection and derision, to obfuscate and lead away from the pertinent facts: it's become very obvious.
There are NO WEAPONS, EVER, that have been developed and are "out there everday both for good and bad making life's better and others worse." There is no dichotomy with WEAPONRY...... And you write like Brotherman, with no punctuation, which means those reading have to concentrate extensively and read over what you write more than once just to ascertain what you are saying, even though we reply with respect to you and punctuate so it is easily understood, and communication is facilitated.
What this exhibits, really, on a larger scale/bigger picture level, is how communicating, with simplistic rules like punctuation disregarded, can hamper and disabuse and confuse, obfuscate and deter from seeking truth....or true sharing, which, ultimately , is what communication is designed to do.
so, i've outlined where we are, and you now have a chance to stand somewhere other than where you are currently standing. BTW, that's a new member to ATS you're attacking with some pretty heavy vitriole....wanna rethink that? Lostgirl is a brand new member, so let's take it easy, K???