It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A Nuclear War is Moments away, prepare yourselves

page: 4
9
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 11 2013 @ 07:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by peashooter
Can we get a response from the creator of this thread xGunthrux?

How often do these spirits contact you?


I suspect it's xGunthrux that is seeking out spirits............ Mr. Daniels and perhaps Mr.Beam and Mr.Walker too!

edit on 11-7-2013 by Logical one because: (no reason given)




posted on Jul, 11 2013 @ 07:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by Miracula

Originally posted by xGunthrux
During this process, bombers from Souther Arabia will be leaving with Nuclear Weapons, they will then strike New York City multiple times.


You had me until this sentence.

Nice try.


well if extremists take control of Morocco, ally's with Saudi Arabia and let them use their territory to launch their tornado fighter-bomber's then New York would be just in range of their missiles.

not to mention Saudi involvement in funding Pakistan's nuclear weapons project and their agreement to supply Saudi Arabia with nuclear weapons within days if requested, and they have nuclear armed cruise missiles, all of this together makes such an attack very possible.



posted on Jul, 11 2013 @ 07:52 PM
link   
Nope, will not happen, at least not that way. First of all, it is quite convenient to claim a supernatural source, since it cannot be verified. I will not focus on that aspect in my argument. I will focus on what I know, which is how a military operates, and the strengths and weaknesses of various militaries around the globe. You state that a country in the ME will nuke the US. There are some problems with this. First of all, there are not any countries who would be foolish enough to even try such a thing, even IF Israel attacked Iran.

Iran does NOT have a nuclear arsenal. Let me start by explaining how a military attack with nuclear weapons would unfold. First of all, there are large scale nuclear missiles, and tactical nuclear missiles. Tactical nukes are smaller, and are used mainly on the battlefield. A nuclear missile designed to strike an entire city is rather large, and these types of missiles will NOT be launched one at a time. There would probably be about 4 dozen missiles launched at strategic locations if a nuclear nation were attacking the US. This is also how the US and Russia would do it. This is exactly what they tell those who track potential incoming missiles as well.

A single false alarm is not going to be a nuclear missile. But if there were dozens of incoming missiles, or even unidentified signatures, that would look more like a nuclear attack. There are few countries in the world who could launch such an attack on the US, and none of them are in the ME. Israel could launch an attack on the US, but they wouldn't, simply because without the US Israel would lose the majority of its military support. It could not survive a war with the US.

And another huge factor that would come into play is the fact that the missile defense shield present in the US is capable of taking out somewhere around a few dozen missiles before being overloaded. And that is only what we know about. Bush initiated a new system, but it is classified. I think it was Bush, although I cannot be certain.

So for ANY nation to succeed in a nuclear attack on the US, they would have to launch a large number of missiles. There are virtually only a handful of nations capable of this. India, Russia, etc...Iran CANNOT do it. They don't have a nuclear arsenal. Pakistan does however. But it is small. So your information might fool someone who knows nothing about such matters, but it will not fool someone who knows a little bit about how war, especially nuclear war, is waged.

I will give a brief list of nuclear nations, with the approximate number of warheads they posses.

USA: 2500 active, 8000 total
Russia: 2000 active, 8500 total
UK: 150 active 250-300 total
France: 300 missiles, most of which are active
China: ??? (probably not many) active, 200-300 total
India: ??? active, 100 total
Pakistan: ??? active, a couple of hundred total
North Korea: Probably zero active, about a dozen total
Israel: ??? active, 100 total

So look at that list, which is fairly accurate, and realize that there are not many nations capable of succeeding in a nuclear attack against the US. And out of those countries, who would attack the US to begin with? And most of those countries for which we don't know the number of active warheads, there probably are either none or very few.
edit on 7/11/13 by JiggyPotamus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 11 2013 @ 07:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Vrillion
 




There is no real winner in war.


This is false propaganda, there are indeed winners in war, those that profit from it, it there were no clear winners there wouldn't be any wars...



posted on Jul, 11 2013 @ 08:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Fakshon
Are you frakkin kidding me? Do you even know how big the world is? It is impossible for any one nation be it China or anyone to invade all of those nations as you have seen. Do you realize just to invade the state of Texas would require a vast army. Not because Texas is well defended and it is, but just the shear size of the state. And saying Asia gets invaded is just plain out there. Asia is so big it would take several large armies to invade. You would literally have to get every single Muslim in the world to freak out and flip a switch and go on attack. It's impossible. Sweeping across the globe via invasions would be impossible today. If for example Iran did persuade all the other Muslim nations to team up with them, the moment that America, NATO, UN, or anyone got a whiff of a massive war they would be wiped off the map. You must realize that technologically and tactically they can't compete on the global scale with America, China, or Europe (Great Britain included). Even if they did destroy New York they would never be able to reach the mass destruction to cripple the U.S.A. Oh and the reason I brought up Texas in the beginning is due to it's size, did you realize you could fit every single human being that is living in the state of Texas and still have room for more. It's that large. The force would have to be insanely massive to invade all of those countries and create any real world wide destruction. Not to mention that probably 90%+ of Texas own guns and know how to use them. Let alone the rest of the south that are gun loving Americans with hunting skills to rival the worlds best shooters. This is a ludicrous vision. Good Day!


have you ever been to texas? much of the north west, as I drove through as a child on family vacation as far as I can remember, is a wasteland.

sure, you could fit all the people there, but as far as logistically living there, it would be disastrous.
edit on 11-7-2013 by ninepointfive because: edit



posted on Jul, 11 2013 @ 08:26 PM
link   
reply to post by xGunthrux
 


well, here's the thing...Saudi Arabia doesn't have nukes

Saudi Arabia is not known to have a nuclear weapons program. From an official and public standpoint, Saudi Arabia has been an opponent of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, having signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and is a member of the coalition of countries demanding a Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone in the Middle East.] Studies of nuclear proliferation have not identified Saudi Arabia as a country of concern.
link



posted on Jul, 11 2013 @ 08:51 PM
link   
reply to post by xGunthrux
 


The unbridled greed of the white man will lead to this great war.

The white man refuses to learn the lessons of history and is blinded by false glory.

Earth is protected by angels, who protect the real worshipers of the God. Earth cannot be ruled by an absolute Satan king.

The satanic white man refuses to accept this fact.

We have considered all aspects and we are unable to see a way out other than destruction.



posted on Jul, 11 2013 @ 09:18 PM
link   
reply to post by reject
 


They do not have them yet as soon as Iran has them they will get them and have no doubt that they will get them...
In part this is why Israel has been sabotaging any other nuclear program in the region, in fact the Saudis have been lead by the nose to depend on the US for security and remain almost an hostage nation of the Anglo-American interests due to this type of geopolitical game (this is an oversimplification but the core of the issues on the region).



posted on Jul, 11 2013 @ 09:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by namehere

well if extremists take control of Morocco, ally's with Saudi Arabia and let them use their territory to launch their tornado fighter-bomber's then New York would be just in range of their missiles.
all of this together makes such an attack very possible.


Seriously???


Haven't you heard that the Muslim brotherhood couldn't keep hold of Egypt.........much less coordinate an invasion of other African nations.

edit on 11-7-2013 by Logical one because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 11 2013 @ 09:41 PM
link   
reply to post by GargIndia
 




The white man refuses to learn the lessons of history


That is a bit racial since it applies to all mankind today. It is a social problem, I grant you that until the end of WW2 the Western civilization had a technological superiority that required of them a greater moral and historical responsibility but since then with the rapid globalization and general access to education and information it is simply no longer true, especially when we observe indigenous people voluntarily discarding their own cultural background and trading it for the worst Western values (not all Westerns share the same values it is just easier to generalize isn't it ?).



posted on Jul, 11 2013 @ 09:50 PM
link   
Sounds like you have been spending to much time on ats,reading doom porn and had a bad dream..



No way in hell bombers will bomb new york city, due to a radar error.. Americans, maybe lazy, but we are not stupid, and bombers are the slowest in the nuclear arsenal..

Just a bad dream man.. This thread reminds me of a county fair or carnival ride a cheap thrill... Makes me hungry for carny food.




posted on Jul, 11 2013 @ 10:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by xGunthrux
Comment on my youtube video channel, I posted a video with this information here: Also if Israel and Iran go to War contact New York City in anyway you can, and tell them to get out of the City!
www.youtube.com...
edit on 11-7-2013 by xGunthrux because: (no reason given)


So, you start a thread here, but want the discussion on your youtube channel. Pretty sure thats some kinda TOS violation there.



posted on Jul, 11 2013 @ 10:42 PM
link   
This is yet another Red Dawn inspired thread that turns up on ATS every so often.
People talking about a successful ground based invasion of the mainland US need to realize it's essentially tactically impossible. Those people usually start off with something like:

"an invading force moves the thousands of troops and supply infrastructure across either coast and establish a beach head because the America military didnt see the coming" . That or "an enemy nation uses an EMP that knocks out every defense system everywhere in America within a few minutes:

Yes their could be successful non-conventional attacks but an actual boots on the ground campaign succeeding is about as likely as Kate Upton showing up at my door right now and covering me in caramel while singing an Opeth song. Their are multiple reasons the most obvious being overall geographic size or bodies of water on 2.5 coasts. An allied nation to the north. Half a southern border that could be turned into a wasteland with a few tactical nukes. I could keep going but it's really just a plot for a bad movie.

Again you want to tell me that a terrorist, domestic/foreign/false flag, could happen in a major city that's something that is a possibility. Their is 100% no logical argument that anyone can come up with for a successful ground based campaign here. As much as that disappoints some people on ATS.



posted on Jul, 11 2013 @ 11:01 PM
link   
No visions ever include Australia....!



posted on Jul, 12 2013 @ 12:32 AM
link   
reply to post by xGunthrux
 


The end is nigh ! ( Oh no ! .....Not again! that's the third time this week ! )

Please..... I can't take any more barmy Armageddon / End of the world predictions !



posted on Jul, 12 2013 @ 02:46 AM
link   
Nuclear war is the LEAST of our worries. Why say "nuclear war!" when biological...which would leave the buildings standing up but all the people dead, and an "EMP pulse" bomb would leave us fighting ourselves to survive-neighbor against neighbor...killing each other for "gimme what you got-water-food whatever"......is far worse? Nuclear war is tame by comparison to what the real war would produce.

Those as yourself show us all how wrong you are when you cant think "out-of-the-box" because all you know is what you read and think ...NUKES! "We're gonna get nuked!".

Take a rest will you...the least of our worries is nuclear war...it'll be much worse than that but your prophecy doesn't see...right? You can only see 1 thing.... NUKES, huh? And thats why you are SOOOOOO wrong. You should get into your bomb shelter quick then...oh wait...2012 didn't happen either.

When one cries "nukes!" ...we know youre out of touch. There's far worse weapons out there. Don't you even READ ATS forums here?

When you said NUCLEAR....most of us went ..."uh huh! NEXT!"
edit on 05/05/13 by mysterioustranger because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 12 2013 @ 03:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by Logical one

Originally posted by namehere

well if extremists take control of Morocco, ally's with Saudi Arabia and let them use their territory to launch their tornado fighter-bomber's then New York would be just in range of their missiles.
all of this together makes such an attack very possible.


Seriously???


Haven't you heard that the Muslim brotherhood couldn't keep hold of Egypt.........much less coordinate an invasion of other African nations.

edit on 11-7-2013 by Logical one because: (no reason given)


maybe so but the possibility remains regardless of whether it will happen or not, in this world you never know what might cause great changes within and embolden a nation or nations to war against another.



posted on Jul, 12 2013 @ 05:06 AM
link   
You sure you can trust this spirit? a lot of deceivers out there!

Remember visions are only a projected outcome of the current state, If there is a single change of circumstances the end result is dramatically altered. Needless to say, SWHTF to some extent lol.



posted on Jul, 12 2013 @ 06:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by UNIT76
i don't claim to know the future.. only a "God" would have that kind of ability..

a "spirit" is still subservient to a "God"

the OP states; no belief in any 'abrahamic' religion is vaild.. (specific terminology) ..why not just call this "monotheistic" ?

the OP states such beliefs are not required to enter "heaven" (but "heaven" is part of the monotheistic,abrahamic scene) why not just call it "nirvana" or "summerland" or "the afterlife"

why is the OP so against the idea of "God" i wonder?




I think the OP has been riding the Spirit Roller Coaster the last couple of years, like another poster in this thread.

Here's what he said at the beginning of this thread...


I have been spoken to by a Spirit from the life after this one, these are some of the visions the spirit gave me. Let me first say that I' am not a Christian or any denomination of that religion, not a Muslim, or any Abrahamic Religion.


Here's what he said in another thread from over two years ago.


A spirit told me this information, I'm not sure if its a good or bad spirit though, so don't trust everything I say. (I dont know what they do with you on a daily basis, this is just certain perks you have while there) Please worship Jesus Christ, and do not commit any sins, repent from all sin. Especially suicide, you take a massive risk of going to hell and being forced to live in a world of anxiety and torment forever if you do.


There's a reason the Bible says not to seek out unfamiliar spirits. This is just one of those reasons.



posted on Jul, 12 2013 @ 08:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by Miracula

Originally posted by xGunthrux
During this process, bombers from Souther Arabia will be leaving with Nuclear Weapons, they will then strike New York City multiple times.


You had me until this sentence.

Nice try.


you actually believed this up to that point?



new topics

top topics



 
9
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join