It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dothedew
I think this is absurd. You shouldn't force food down children's throats, I have 2 kids and by god, if they don't like it, they won't eat it. Its up to the parents and children to establish healthy eating habits.
These kids should be offered choices. My old school did, and it was fantastic. Yes, an ideal lunch would be around 500 calories, but what about the atheletes? Between the ages of 14 and 19, I consumed upwards of 4000 calories a day. I HAD TO. I burned off the excess energy, no problem. And I hate to say it to the health nuts, but you can't sustain a training routine based on celery and yogurt. ID be eating my body weight in food every day....
They need choices, not forced policies.
Elementary school students in grades kindergarten through fifth are allowed 650 calories per meal.
Moving into middle school, lunches served to children in sixth through eighth grades have a slightly increased calorie maximum at 700.
By the time they are teenagers in high school, students are allowed 850 calories per meal — about one-third of the total calories they require per day. According to WebMD, active teens between the ages of 14 and 18 years require approximately 2,400 calories per day.
Originally posted by dothedew
I think this is absurd. You shouldn't force food down children's throats, I have 2 kids and by god, if they don't like it, they won't eat it. Its up to the parents and children to establish healthy eating habits.
These kids should be offered choices. My old school did, and it was fantastic. Yes, an ideal lunch would be around 500 calories, but what about the atheletes? Between the ages of 14 and 19, I consumed upwards of 4000 calories a day. I HAD TO. I burned off the excess energy, no problem. And I hate to say it to the health nuts, but you can't sustain a training routine based on celery and yogurt. ID be eating my body weight in food every day....
They need choices, not forced policies.
This whole...America has earned the right to be the fatest most diabetic country on earth.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by Indigo5
This whole...America has earned the right to be the fatest most diabetic country on earth.
Quite wrong that title belongs to Mexico
Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
The First Lady's program was wrong....
....
A good diet is relatively high protein, lower carb [most carbs from veggies and quality high-fiber grains], low sugar and low in vegetable fats [with the exception of olive oil].....
edit on Wed Jul 10 2013 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by tigershark1988
I can tell you I have an extremely high metabolism, have never fluctuated in weight and I am eating more often then a 300 pound fat person... I weigh 135.
I am aware that I am an extreme minority.edit on 10-7-2013 by tigershark1988 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by rickymouse
Originally posted by tigershark1988
I can tell you I have an extremely high metabolism, have never fluctuated in weight and I am eating more often then a 300 pound fat person... I weigh 135.
I am aware that I am an extreme minority.edit on 10-7-2013 by tigershark1988 because: (no reason given)
Can you go a long time without eating anything, or does your mind get erratic and you get uneasy if you don't eat?
Originally posted by jimmyx
so let me get this straight........the republicans are not happy with the fed. government supplying nutritious lunches to school kids because the won't eat it....and....they are not happy with the fed. government supplying food stamps that buys crappy food that makes them fat.
you can't fix stupid.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
KIds who are athletes need MANY more calories than Michelle Obama's version of lunch.
The kids and the parents know what they need. Not the White House.
Originally posted by jimmyx
Can you go a long time without eating anything, or does your mind get erratic and you get uneasy if you don't eat?
Originally posted by rickymouse
then ask for seconds of more fruits and vegetables at school...and you can eat all of the sugar, fat, and lard when you get home
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by jimmyx
so let me get this straight........the republicans are not happy with the fed. government supplying nutritious lunches to school kids because the won't eat it....and....they are not happy with the fed. government supplying food stamps that buys crappy food that makes them fat.
you can't fix stupid.
Well, you almost have it....except you can check the party line B.S. at the door for this one. It doesn't fit. This was an initiative by the Obama Family not the Democratic National Committee. I don't recall Pelosi, Reid or any lesser members of Congressional Democratic Leadership making this any form of priority on any level, whatsoever. They've been around long enough, it seems, to know the difference between important issues and feel good nonsense to create more problems than it ever solves.
No...This isn't about Republicans or Democrats. This is about the boundless ego of one man and one woman in a very specific case of reach down from the highest office in the nation to the lunch counter of the elementary school down the street.
It was just as out of place, wrong headed and outright overstepping bounds when Bush decided he was going to join Laura and FORCE this nation to get in shape by decree to the Federal Government, again, through the schools. Well.....No Child Left Behind became plenty of Children left behind with fatter bodies and worse health. These federal brainstorms really work out, don't they?