It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by colbe
1 - Again .. there is NO SUCH THING as 'yet to be approved' messages. 2 - Again.. these are CONDEMNED and are not from God.
3 - Again .. it is not helpful to people to push fake messages on them. If they were to convert because of fake messages, and then they found out those messages are fake, then their faith will be built on sand and easily washed away at the first rain storm. Matthew 7:24-27
Official stages of investigation into Catholic Apparitions
1) constat de supernaturalitate (established as supernatural),
2) constat de non supernaturalitate (established as not supernatural); or
3) non constat de supernaturalitate (not established as supernatural).
Please note that there is no ‘yet to be approved’ stage. If anyone says that a certain seer or alleged apparition is ‘yet to be approved’ .. don’t buy it. That PRESUMES that there will be an approval later and so it is a very disingenuous thing to say.
Responsibility of the Faithful in Regards to Alleged Apparitions
he first responsibility of the faithful is to remain firmly established in the faith, in the sacraments and in communion with the Pope and bishops. Any Catholic who gives their primary attention to alleged private revelation at the expense of Sacred Scripture, the teaching of the Church (especially the Catechism), sacramental practice, prayer and fidelity to Church authority is off course. The running after spiritual phenomena, such as alleged revelations, is condemned by St. John of the Cross as spiritual avarice. This means that pious souls who would be repulsed by crude materialistic greed think nothing of being greedy to know revelations and prophecies. An exclusive, or even a predominant attention to these matters (especially apocalyptic ones), cannot help but produce an unbalanced spirituality. Should the Church condemn some favorite alleged revelation such a person may find themselves believing more in it than in the supernatural authority of the Church. The devil will have succeeded in what he had set out to do.edit on 8/6/2013
by FlyersFan because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by colbe
There are daily yet to be approved messages from Heaven.
BISHOPS have been WRONG on their disapproval of private revelation.
Jesus established the authority in the Catholic Church through the Apostles, with Peter as their Head. Through Apostolic and Papal succession, the Bishops are the successors to the Apostles, with the Pope (Peter) as the Head. And, as successors to the Apostles, it is the Bishops duty to safeguard and protect the faithful in the purity of the Catholic faith. The very real danger in following an alleged visionary is that one can very easily be led astray by the erroneous teachings and revelations of a false mystic or visionary. In fact, throughout the centuries, some Catholics have been led out of the Church by false visionaries and seers.
The Catholic Church, through the inspiration and guidance of the Holy Spirit given to the Pope and the Bishops alone has the authority to judge the private revelations of mystics and visionaries, and it is our obligation and duty to obey the judgment of the Church. Catholics should be aware that willful disobedience to the Church is a sin. Willful disobedience is when one knowingly and intentionally disobeys the legitimate authority and judgment of the Church. (ie- local Bishop). Even should the local Bishop mistakenly disapprove of a genuine revelation, obedience to the Church always remains paramount. It is a sin to propagate a private revelation disobediently, but it can never be a sin not to propagate one.
While we are free to have an personal opinion regarding a private revelation, we must submit to the judgment of the Church with practical obedience. What this means is that while we are free to disagree privately with a Bishops decision, (the Bishop is not infallible these matters), we are obligated to obey with practical obedience, that is, we may not act against the Bishops decree or judgment; we may not propagate the private revelation or alleged messages that the Bishop has judged negatively, or continue to say publicly that you regard it as genuine. No private individual has the authority to judge definitively and officially which private revelations are true and which are not. The authority to rule on the authenticity of a private revelation rests solely with the local Bishop.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by colbe
There are daily yet to be approved messages from Heaven.
That is disingenuous. Calling all messages 'yet to be approved' is nothing more than trying to sell those messages as something that will eventually be approved by the Church. That's a lie. It's RARE for the church to approve messages and to make a blanket statement that messages are 'yet to be approved' is deceitful.
And to call Condemned messages ... like Garbandal ... 'yet to be approved' ... is dead wrong.
BISHOPS have been WRONG on their disapproval of private revelation.
That is a RARE instance and to go about disregarding condemned messages because, once in a millenia the church reverses it's decision, is reckless behavior and it is against church teaching to do so.
Mystics of the Church
Jesus established the authority in the Catholic Church through the Apostles, with Peter as their Head. Through Apostolic and Papal succession, the Bishops are the successors to the Apostles, with the Pope (Peter) as the Head. And, as successors to the Apostles, it is the Bishops duty to safeguard and protect the faithful in the purity of the Catholic faith. The very real danger in following an alleged visionary is that one can very easily be led astray by the erroneous teachings and revelations of a false mystic or visionary. In fact, throughout the centuries, some Catholics have been led out of the Church by false visionaries and seers.
The Catholic Church, through the inspiration and guidance of the Holy Spirit given to the Pope and the Bishops alone has the authority to judge the private revelations of mystics and visionaries, and it is our obligation and duty to obey the judgment of the Church. Catholics should be aware that willful disobedience to the Church is a sin. Willful disobedience is when one knowingly and intentionally disobeys the legitimate authority and judgment of the Church. (ie- local Bishop). Even should the local Bishop mistakenly disapprove of a genuine revelation, obedience to the Church always remains paramount. It is a sin to propagate a private revelation disobediently, but it can never be a sin not to propagate one.
While we are free to have an personal opinion regarding a private revelation, we must submit to the judgment of the Church with practical obedience. What this means is that while we are free to disagree privately with a Bishops decision, (the Bishop is not infallible these matters), we are obligated to obey with practical obedience, that is, we may not act against the Bishops decree or judgment; we may not propagate the private revelation or alleged messages that the Bishop has judged negatively, or continue to say publicly that you regard it as genuine. No private individual has the authority to judge definitively and officially which private revelations are true and which are not. The authority to rule on the authenticity of a private revelation rests solely with the local Bishop.
Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by BO XIAN
. . .
via Lee Strobel's THE CASE FOR THE REAL JESUS . . .
Interview with Craig A Evans, PhD . . . a decade as Editer-in-chief of the [I]Bulletin for Biblical Research[/I]. . . begins on p 29
- - -
Re the "SECRET GOSPEL OF MARK"
p48
"Morton Smith was a professor of Judeo-Christian origins at Columbia University for years. At a meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature in 1960, he announced that two years earlier he had made a historic discovery at the Mar Saba Monastery in the Judean wilderness. . . .
The document was never examined by experts because "It's gone. [I]Vanished[/I]."
He did photograph it. After he died, the photos were studied and analyzed by a well-regarded patent attorney and amateur biblical scholar who well investigated the case, including handwriting experts. He wrote therefrom:
[I]The Gospel Hoax: Morton Smith's Invention of Secret Mark[/I]
The evidence very starkly indicates a hoax and the weight of the evidence indicates that Smith, up for tenure, perpetrated the hoax.
= = = =
That's the ilk of the absurdities in or about all the more or less absurd challenges to the historical record.
Originally posted by arpgme
Jesus and Lucifer are a deception.
The "light" (God and The Angels / Elohim / Annunaki) seeks to control everyone and everything. The Darkness (The Watchers / Nephilim / Igigi) they are the only one fighting against the for freedom.
Lucifer is a double agent, he pretends to be evil while he is being used by the Annunaki / Elohim. If you read The book of Job you would know his close relationship with "Yahweh/Anu" (Leader of Heavenly Hosts), and how Lucifer is here just to tempt people. He is not the true "Satan". He is Marduk, Murugan, one who has left the forces of darkness to be used by God (Leader of The Heavenly Hosts) . Whether he is serving the light knowingly or unknowingly, he is being used as a "temper" or an "adversary" (Satan) of mankind.
The Greatest deception was thinking that The Annunaki are fallen angels, when really The Annunaki are The Elohim and those who "fell" from the Annunaki/Elohim are called "igigi" (What the bible calls "Watchers").
Originally posted by Premierwest
Jesus Christ, The Father and The Holy Ghost are three separate individulas, but ONE in purpose. The concept of God reasons a master intelligence, supreme charachter, infinite wisdom and eternal in nature. Is that not the aspiration of every living person? To be "God" is within every soul who has or will walk the earth. Jesus Christ had an exemplary life that demonstrated the highest integrity of any man known in history recorded. To follow Jesus is to move closer to a state of godliness. Jesus, himself followed The Father.
That is not a "distortion", it is placing God in the correct context, with Jesus being the living example of His character, rather than the mythologised context God had been placed in by the self-serving Jewish scriptures.
. . . the life and message of Jesus has been distorted, taken completely out of context and sensationalized to the point ppl believe more in the "son" than the Creator.
If you have any belief in Jesus, it would ultimately have originated from the New Testament. Without the NT, there wouldn't be anything on which to base a belief in Jesus. So in one definition of the word, you could say that the new testament is the bible on Jesus. If you were to study the NT, you would see that according to what is written in it, Jesus is not "separate" from God.
To me, Jesus is separate from God
1 Timothy 3:16 (a quote from the New Testament) says something about that,
and I have difficulty with the God made flesh aspect
The NT makes it clear, and goes to a lot of trouble setting it up, that Jesus was more than just a person who hit onto some underlying universal truths.
that brings us to the whole Son, Spirit, Holy Ghost thing..... For me, to believe in the "one true God" means that Jesus would be no more than a teacher
In the novel, Goldstein is rumoured to be a former top member of the Party and an early associate of its leader, "Big Brother". Goldstein is said to have broken away early in the movement and started an organization known as "The Brotherhood", dedicated to the fall of the Party. Ostensibly "The Brotherhood" is organized into cells, with each member required to read The Book, supposedly written by Goldstein, The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism. Goldstein is always the subject of the "Two Minutes Hate", a daily, 2-minute period beginning at 11:00 am at which an image of Goldstein is shown on the telescreen, which helps to ensure that popular devotion towards Big Brother is continuous.
The novel raises but leaves unanswered the questions of whether Goldstein or "The Brotherhood" really exist. When asked by Winston in the torture room, Inner Party member O'Brien adamantly refuses to reveal whether "The Brotherhood" truly exists.
Satan is definitely not our brother.
You are encouraged to pray for the least of your brothers and sisters, and yet you would withhold that gesture from the one person who needs it most? Such hypocrisy.
Jesus was not just an ordinary man according to the New Testament, but was in the form of god before he became a man.
Jesus Christ was this man, he was the Passover sacrifice from God to mankind,
Satan is definitely not our brother.
Satan is not even a human being.
I have serious doubts that Satan is an actual individual person.
Jesus already has judged, condemned, and cast down Satan.
Either Satan is out of the way, or Satan is a very real threat that we must be wary of in our imperfect state of being. It cannot be both ways.