Obama orders federal workers: Spy on each other.

Linchpin for Obama’s plan to predict future leakers unproven, isn’t likely to work, experts say

WASHINGTON — In an initiative aimed at rooting out future leakers and other security violators, President Barack Obama has ordered federal employees to report suspicious actions of their colleagues based on behavioral profiling techniques that are not scientifically proven to work, according to experts and government documents.

The techniques are a key pillar of the Insider Threat Program, an unprecedented government-wide crackdown under which millions of federal bureaucrats and contractors must watch out for “high-risk persons or behaviors” among co-workers. Those who fail to report them could face penalties, including criminal charges.

I Spy with my little eye


So let me get this straight the 'most transparent' administration in US history has ordered a government wide crackdown, tells it's 'employee's to spy on each other.

Am I reading that wrong?

And using techniques proven NOT to work!

Yo Obama if there is a fifth column in your government YOU DESERVE TO BE RATTED OUT,.

You do!

Hello NSA hope you had a good 4th of july weekend hope the hotdogs and beer was good.

Nazi style all the way.

reply to post by neo96
Look on the bright side Neo- maybe the employees of all those despicable alphabet agencies will race to report on each other so that suspicion won't fall on them and voila.....they all implode! A girl can hope, can't she?

Obama and Hitler would have been best friends outside of racial differences.

The Night of the Long Knives 2.0 is coming

Obama and Hitler would have been best friends outside of racial differences.

The Night of the Long Knives 2.0 is coming

reply to post by neo96


Well, this is one of those times I'm glad he's an idiot. I'd certainly be the last one to start telling him what techniques DO work.

Hey, Barry! Great job! Wonderful technique--this should solve all your leak problems in no time. Keep up the good work....!

reply to post by neo96


Didn't Obama pass some sort of legislation protecting whistle-blowers?

Is it "whistle-blowers" if they tell on business and "leakers" when they tell on government?

I really am unclear on the distinction.

Hmmm....where have we heard instructions like that before?...let me think...let me think....Wait! I know!







That's just f'ing great...I guess a blind man could have saw this coming...

Wonderful isn't it?

ETA...

I guess the next thing is that you will be "a good citizen" if you report your neighbors next...

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by neo96

 

Didn't Obama pass some sort of legislation protecting whistle-blowers?

Is it "whistle-blowers" if they tell on business and "leakers" when they tell on government?

I really am unclear on the distinction.

No, no. You got it right. He passed legislation to protect whistleblowers, and then started prosecuting them under the 1917 Espionage Act. A full 7 of the 10 prosecutions by all presidents under that Act have been by Obama.

Draw your own conclusions....

reply to post by beezzer

Didn't Obama pass some sort of legislation protecting whistle-blowers?

LOL i didn't know he did so basically he signed a law that protects Snowden!!!

blogs.wsj.com...

I have no idea how that is suppose to work find leakers and protects them at the same time?

Think hes confused.

Apparently this was EO 13587 signed by Mr O on Oct 7, 2011.

A lot of good it did as we now know

Somebody probably kept kicking the can down the road as usual because they couldn't trust anybody's better judgement

The EO refers to " responsible sharing and safe-guarding " .....

Those are common codewords for rats and snitches.

(h) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and
appropriate protections for privacy and civil liberties, and subject to the
availability of appropriations.

...---...

(i) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit,
substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party
against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers,
employees, or agents, or any other person.

reply to post by neo96


reply to post by Ex_CT2


A) So basically, Obama is a flaming hypocrite.

B) Either that or he is schitzophrenic.

C) Or is it just that he wants the dirt on everyone BUT himself.

(the answer is D) All Of The Above )

Originally posted by Ex_CT2

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by neo96

 

Didn't Obama pass some sort of legislation protecting whistle-blowers?

Is it "whistle-blowers" if they tell on business and "leakers" when they tell on government?

I really am unclear on the distinction.

No, no. You got it right. He passed legislation to protect whistleblowers, and then started prosecuting them under the 1917 Espionage Act. A full 7 of the 10 prosecutions by all presidents under that Act have been by Obama.

Draw your own conclusions....

This is called the bait and switch

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by neo96

 

reply to post by Ex_CT2

 

A) So basically, Obama is a flaming hypocrite.

B) Either that or he is schitzophrenic.

C) Or is it just that he wants the dirt on everyone BUT himself.

(the answer is D) All Of The Above )

All of the above and smelling like roses all the way to Naziville.

Originally posted by Ex_CT2

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by neo96

 

Didn't Obama pass some sort of legislation protecting whistle-blowers?

Is it "whistle-blowers" if they tell on business and "leakers" when they tell on government?

I really am unclear on the distinction.

No, no. You got it right. He passed legislation to protect whistleblowers, and then started prosecuting them under the 1917 Espionage Act. A full 7 of the 10 prosecutions by all presidents under that Act have been by Obama.

Draw your own conclusions....

This is called the bait and switch

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by neo96

 

reply to post by Ex_CT2

 

A) So basically, Obama is a flaming hypocrite.

B) Either that or he is schitzophrenic.

C) Or is it just that he wants the dirt on everyone BUT himself.

(the answer is D) All Of The Above )

Couldn't find a video of the Charades game "on the nose" gesture. But yeah....

reply to post by neo96

WASHINGTON — In an initiative aimed at rooting out future leakers and other security violators, President Barack Obama has ordered federal employees to report suspicious actions of their colleagues based on behavioral profiling techniques that are not scientifically proven to work, according to experts and government documents.

Does this only apply to the work environment? What if their neighbors are doing something suspicious? Should our kids be trained to turn their parents in? What phrase am I looking for? Oh yeah, Heil Hitler!

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by neo96

 

reply to post by Ex_CT2

 

A) So basically, Obama is a flaming hypocrite.

B) Either that or he is schitzophrenic.

C) Or is it just that he wants the dirt on everyone BUT himself.

(the answer is D) All Of The Above )

all of the above with express emphasis on C)

he needs the dirt to keep the river of shame flowing away from him.

especially if and when THIS becomes known.....

The Bombshell that has Yet to be analyzed ....

But soon will be.
The possible way Obama became THEE "Puppet" of all puppets


October 20, 1981

Brinks robbery in which several members of the Weather Underground stole over $1 million from a Brinks armored car near Nyack, New York. The robbers murdered 2 police officers and 1 Brinks guard. Several others were wounded.


from October 2008

It’s 1981, New York City. Barack Obama is residing two blocks away from Weather Underground leader William Ayers. We know very little about Obama’s life in NYC during that period; supposedly he transferred from Occidental College and completed undergraduate studies at Columbia University. Obama’s academic records and, in fact, the records of his life from those years in New York are lost. [See references at end.]

At Occidental, Obama belonged to Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), a radical socialist organization of which the Weather Underground was an off-shoot. Did Obama continue his SDS membership at Columbia? (I read recently that Columbia was a major SDS center.)

In 1981, former Weather Underground members along with a few former Black Panthers are arrested in association with the robbery of a Brinks armored truck 20 miles north of Manhattan. A guard is killed and the driver is wounded. $1.6 million is recovered.

One of the Weather Underground members arrested for the Brinks crime is Kathy Boudin. She is sentenced to 20 years-to-life. Boudin leaves behind a child, Chesa Boudin, who ends up being raised by Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn while her mother lives in prison.

One of the former Black Panthers arrested in connection with the Brinks robbery is Nathaniel Burns, a member of the Black Liberation Army. Burns is also known as Sekou Odinga. Burns/Odinga is sentenced to 25 years-to-life for attempted murder of a police officer. (ODINGA, sound familiar?)

Obama and Ayers later end up collaborating on several controversial projects in Chicago. They work together to grant funds to Rashid Khalidi, Trinity United Church of Christ, and ACORN, among other “worthy” recipients. Ayers and Dohrn host a soirée at their home to launch young Barack’s political career. (But we’re now to believe that Barack did not know that Ayers and Dohrn created and starred in the Weather Underground, for which they were tried as criminals.)

As we often see in Obama’s history, here again there are a few degrees of separation that cause curious and intelligent people to ask: Is this just another set of odd coincidences?

I believe that Obama knew Ayers in New York City, and that he’s hiding the association with Ayers, among others, in refusing to provide information about his life there.

Obviously Obama’s campaign is lying (and insulting our intelligence) when it audaciously claims that Obama knew nothing of Ayers’ affiliation with the Weather Underground, up until…when?..(I must have missed that part of Axelrod’s explanation. When does he claim that Obama learned about Ayer’s lifelong project, the WU?)

In any event, accepting Axelrod’s explanation would require us to conclude that Obama is stupid. Really stupid, which sort of flies in the face of the magna cum laude thing from Harvard, right?

Everyone knows that the REAL questions are:

When did Obama first learn about Ayers? When did he first meet Ayers? What were his “off-campus” activities in New York? Perhaps if Obama were open about his life, and did not go to such extreme lengths to cover up fundamental facts of his existence, we would not be forced to outline such events as the 1981 Brinks robbery.

1981, New York City: Just a Bizarre Coincidence?

Now add 1+1 and maybe we get a young vulnerable Obama involved in this ?

He admits drug use during those years.

He was already indoctrinated into a "Marxist" agenda.

And God only knows what else by then.

Ayers / Dohrn were very experienced in recruiting by that time and they were professional criminals.

The Perfect Puppet

Figure it out for yourselves !!!!!!

The Brink's Robbery (1981)

"What a Country!" TV Spot from WPIX-11

Let's hear it now!

Oh... I wish you a snitchy Christmas and a Busted New Year!

Woo-Hoo! Isn't that how some past and present totalitarian states have operated? Everyone becomes each others keeper under penalty of sharing their fate? He's really getting pretty wild with this crap.

reply to post by neo96


The US government is looking more and more like a paranoid totalitarian regime.

This will definitely not work, in fact it might have the opposite effect. This creates massive levels of paranoia and distrust and will damage all aspects of government. The moment you ask employees to start spying on each other you create a hostile environment that more and more people will want to escape from. If I were in such a place I would be planning to leave, and I would be planning to take as much incriminating evidence with me as I possibly could.

Not surprised since these sorts of decisions fit his personality profile. He fancies himself a king and unfortunately he is treated like one which reinforces the madness. God let this 4 years be done before more damage is done - or give someone in power the insight and guts to stop this ego run amok.

People will either become more secretive and rebellious with this sort of rule because of how it makes them feel day to day (not attached to coworkers but suspicious and therefore unable to form strong bonds) or work morale will drop since people won't feel safe in airing grievances or even being at ease around each other.