It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The perfect Savior said: "Whoever has ears to hear, let him hear. The first aeon is that of Son of Man, who is called 'First Begetter', who is called 'Savior', who has appeared. The second aeon (is) that of Man, who is called 'Adam, Eye of Light'. That which embraces these is the aeon over which there is no kingdom, (the aeon) of the Eternal Infinite God, the Self-begotten aeon of the aeons that are in it, (the aeon) of the immortals, whom I described earlier, (the aeon) above the Seventh, that appeared from Sophia, which is the first aeon. (Source)
adjensen
reply to post by Gryphon66
What are you talking about? The Gnostics believed that an Aeon is an emanation from God -- I showed you the text, but here's an explanation, since you don't seem to understand what "The first aeon is that of Son of Man, who is called 'First Begetter', who is called 'Savior', who has appeared" means. Aeon (Gnosticism) wiki entry
You should have said your only understanding of gnosticism came from Wikipedia.
Aeons: God's essence goes through emanations that spontaneously expand into pairs of male and female entities that the Gnostics call Aeons. Gnostics believe that these eternal beings emanating themselves from the Godhead in successive generations result in destabilizing the primordial cosmos. (Source)
adjensen
reply to post by 2012newstart
I vote for Thomas to be included in the canonical books in the next ecumenical council!
You are, of course, welcome to your opinion, but Thomas would never be included in the canon because a) the canon is closed, and b) Thomas is a book from another religion.
Doesn't keep people from trying, though, witness The New New Testament, by the same clowns that brought you the Jesus Seminar. Because Christianity doesn't support the far-left beliefs of the JS crowd, they're happy to just invent one that does.
adjensen
reply to post by 2012newstart
I vote for Thomas to be included in the canonical books in the next ecumenical council!
You are, of course, welcome to your opinion, but Thomas would never be included in the canon because a) the canon is closed, and b) Thomas is a book from another religion.
Doesn't keep people from trying, though, witness The New New Testament, by the same clowns that brought you the Jesus Seminar. Because Christianity doesn't support the far-left beliefs of the JS crowd, they're happy to just invent one that does.
In 1965, Pope Paul VI and the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople Athenagoras I nullified the anathemas of 1054
adjensen
I'd direct you to the excellent book on the subject by Bart Ehrman, Lost Christianities, the Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew, but I doubt you'd read it, and if you did, you'd dismiss it, because Ehrman's conclusions as to how the Gnostic Christians viewed Christ coincide with mine.
Adjensen:
Thomas would never be included in the canon because a) the canon is closed, and b) Thomas is a book from another religion.
Adjensen : " Thomas is a book from another religion. "
"Thomas" is not a book of another religion. This is again a purely personal view of OP. The so called "heretics" are also Christians with valid Baptism, that was accepted as valid as early as Nicaea and other early centuries' councils. The HERETICS ARE CHRISTIAN according to both Catholic and Orthodox churches' view. Their view however differs on that point with the view of Adjensen. Please make that important difference. While Adjensen pretends to defend Churches' view (perhaps early catholic), Adjensen's views are at odd on the point what both the early church and the contemporary church declared in their teachings regarding the so called HERETICS.