It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
James Robertson breaks ranks and says he was shocked to hear of changes to allow broader authorisation of NSA programs
A former federal judge who granted government surveillance requests has broken ranks to criticise the system of secret courts as unfit for purpose in the wake of recent revelations by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. James Robertson, who retired from the District of Columbia circuit in 2010, was one of a select group of judges who presided over the so-called Fisa courts, set up under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which are intended to provide legal oversight and protect against unnecessary privacy intrusions.
Originally posted by olaru12
What I would like to see, is the rightwing conservatives and the leftwing progressives unite against the common foe that wants to stifle freedom of speech and assembly.
But I sincerely doubt that will happen with the forces of division fanning the partisan, agenda driven flames of hatred. You know who you are....edit on 9-7-2013 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dreamingawake
How about you?
Originally posted by xavi1000
James Robertson is late or ?
US must fix secret Fisa courts, says top judge who granted surveillance orders
James Robertson breaks ranks and says he was shocked to hear of changes to allow broader authorisation of NSA programs
A former federal judge who granted government surveillance requests has broken ranks to criticise the system of secret courts as unfit for purpose in the wake of recent revelations by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. James Robertson, who retired from the District of Columbia circuit in 2010, was one of a select group of judges who presided over the so-called Fisa courts, set up under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which are intended to provide legal oversight and protect against unnecessary privacy intrusions.
www.guardian.co.uk...edit on 9-7-2013 by xavi1000 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by dreamingawake
How about you?
Well, to be honest....the question wasn't meant to elicit a display of one's phallus.
Originally posted by Battleline
reply to post by dreamingawake
DOJ, that's Eric Holder...........right?
Some now I don't think the DOJ under the rule of Holder and his boss care one bit about what the people want or care about.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Well, to be honest....the question wasn't meant to elicit a display of one's phallus.
Originally posted by TopsyTurvyOne
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Well, to be honest....the question wasn't meant to elicit a display of one's phallus.
you talkin' to me? i am well up to your reverse psychology lingo
twisting tactics, you bigfatfurryfecker!
Originally posted by TopsyTurvyOne
the question nobody is asking is why are they making their tyranny so blatant?
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by dreamingawake
Well, i certainly meant no offense. I am quite blunt, and come across rudely from time to time.
Or, perhaps more properly stated: i tend to be sarcastic and blunt.
In any event, the "keyboard commando" is the mentality that is in my sights. Kony 2012 is the poster child for the indifference of modern activism.
Originally posted by jrod
Originally posted by TopsyTurvyOne
the question nobody is asking is why are they making their tyranny so blatant?
Because the majority of the sheep like the illusion of a security blanket. In my hometown of Cocoa Beach there are hundreds of security cameras, many are strategically placed to spy on certain houses. If you ask the average resident, especially the soccer mom types they love the cameras and think it makes them safer. The reality is if they do catch a crime in progress, by the time the police respond it will be too late. They do nothing to reduce crime.
Why do they need to keep there tyranny secret when all you need to do to achieve your agenda is buy the fools with food stamps and free phones.
Originally posted by TopsyTurvyOne
the question nobody is asking is why are they making their tyranny so blatant?
this is not how covert scheming progresses.
this is either going to be very good or very bad.
"The NSA has no constitutional right to secretly obtain the telephone records of every American citizen on a daily basis, subject them to sophisticated data mining and store them forever. It's time government officials are charged with criminal conduct, including lying to Congress" - James Bamford
Q: In “The Shadow Factory,” you quote the late Sen. Frank Church, the first chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who said the NSA’s data collection “could be turned around on the American people and no American would have any privacy left, such [is] the capability to monitor everything: telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn’t matter. There would be no place to hide. If this government ever became a tyranny, if a dictator ever took charge in this country, the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back.” What do you make of Church’s comments today?
A: He was enormously prescient and we should have heeded his warning.