Originally posted by edsinger
NO I dont need to, it said they had contacts and links. Plus many other items also pointed to this idea that did not make the 911 report.
As there is evidence of 'contacts' and 'links' between OBL and the Bush family. The actual extent
of said contacts and links is what's
important. To get an idea of what actual connection
is and isn't supported by actual evidence, yet again; read the 911 Report
So your liberal Press is the bomb now? LIke maybe CBS? Scrutiny is in the eye of the beholder in this case.
See this is the thing, edsinger. Actual proof
is always proof
; it's not
the same thing as guesses, assumptions or loosely based
opinions. It has nothing
to do with either liberals nor their counterparts. So get your head out for once, edsinger.
Ah the ol collabaration, well as for 911 we will leave that to the side a minute. So all these CONTACTS that are in the 911 report, we they
just meeting about about the upcomming Saddam's birthday party? The contacts were not about the electric bill and it is kinda hard to get concrete
infor froma humanINT group that was gutted in the mid 90's.
Yeah. It's 'hard' to find actual evidence
to support these bs claims of Al-Qaida's cooperation with Saddam, so let's not bother with
what's credible at all. Simply stick to that which fits your opinion, huh? Gimme a break
NO becuase you will not believe until you see the Germans standing in Paris as in 1940.
Well actually it would surprise me quite a bit if I were to see Germans standing in Paris as they did in 1940.
Is this yet another 'imminent threat' you have 'inside information' on?
Iran has helped AlQada sure, so have some Saudi Nationals, but so did Saddam.
As there is evidence of the US training and supporting military groups closely associated with Al-Qaida; active in Bosnia as well as Kosovo during the
I've said this before. I'd love to see you try and get away with this logic of yours to argue a case in a court of law.
[edit on 9-11-2004 by Durden]