It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
But you missed the entire context, if the Bible is inerrant as ID and CS claim, then there should no contradiction.
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
Instead, there are those confusing passages, mere fodder for the apologists. (Those were a small sampling, actually.)
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
And there would not be the two (2) accounts of creation in Genesis. There is no confusion?!?
Originally posted by saint4God
From what I understand ID does not equal Christian necessarily, though if you are Christian, then ID is easier to comprehend. CS? Is that Christian Science? I dunno what's being said there, sorry. I was a studying scientist who is Christian, but not a Christian Science (which doesn't seem to employ either from what I've read so far).
Originally posted by saint4God
I don't apologize, nor know what apologists have to do with us. Here at ATS, we discuss what we know, the truth, and investigate what we don't know...at least that's what seems to be written as the foundation of the site.
Originally posted by saint4God
*looks in Genesis* I don't see two accounts of creation. What are you referring to here?
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
Why would being a Christian make it easier to comprehend? Is there some special gnosis only for the adepts?
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
CS - what? where have you been Saint?
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
And as you "proved" (merely stated) in a previous post, Christianity is apparently mutually exclusive with respect to CS.
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
But that is not the case in my abundant experience. Being Christian in belief myself, am I just somehow impaired in that "flyingspaghettimonsterism" is beyond my ken?
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
Or do you want to drive me entirely away from the faith?
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
Apologists of Christianity have been very busy since the first centuries of the Common Era.
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
You don't even know the history of your faith?!?
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
In this context, the term means essentially "explanation." Besides, what does it have to do with the founding principles of ATS?
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
Wow, honest to God?!?
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
You don't see it?!? Such dual narratives are so common in the Bible that they have been known for centuries as "couplets." This is a revelation of the abyssmal depths of the definition of "blind faith."
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
I almost provided an answer to each part of your pointless miasma. How far from the topic can you digress?
Instead I started over completely in response.
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
You're merely providing more evidence for Creationist Confusion by confusing the issue in a morass of digressive questions. Basically, it's just what I've encountered so often - you try to frame the argument in only your own terms. You're not clever, you're splitting hairs.
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
Instead, answer something that is perfectly germane to the topic. If creationism is actually science, what is its testable hypothesis?
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
What intelligent design hypothesis has even been ventured as a rival explanation of any biological or geological phenomenon?
.
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
If creationism has merit, do the science, prove it. Period.
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
I choose to believe that God created the universe and that we are discovering how it was done. And we are endowed with God-given reason in that course of discovery. How great is the sin of not using the means we have of thinking?
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
Thought and reason are among the finest attributes of humans. Hopefully, that is a reflection of the Creator. But the sciences are indicative of origins that diverge widely from Genesis. Perhaps that is a function of the writers and editors of the Bible, in that scientific thought was alien to them. With certainty, however, science based upon careful observations and reasoning simply does not confirm the Biblical creation narrative.
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
Science can not prove God. If it could, that would be anathema to religion, which emphasizes belief and faith, not proof. And saying that "God did it" is not an explanation. You might as well assert "It's because I say so."
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
One science that, IMHO, could provide evidence of Divine structuring is quantum physics (QP). Presently, the incomprehensibilty of its tenets are reminiscent of attributes ascribed to the ultimate Godhead. Otherwise, it appears that QP describes "ordered chaos" that permeates every stretch of the universe. Even space-time itself seems to be somehow impressed with an order. After all, we know that mass does warp space-time, so can energy.
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
Without offending God in any way, we may use reason, which led inexorably to science. Moreover, it would be an offense not to think, being that it is one of our greatest gifts.
Originally posted by saint4God
You have both my curiosity and attention here. How does quantum physics provide evidence of Divine structuring?
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
Apparently it does at a scale smaller than strings. And additional spatial dimensions are theorized to exist within such tiny realms.
Do some research, it is amazing topic which I've researched for many years. Even in Einstein's day, he called quantum behavior "spooky."
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
No one truly understands quantum physics completely. But it was said during the mid-20th century that there were 2 people who did. Though Edward Witten is now one of those making headway with the "M" theory. There are a host of others, Stephen Hawking of course and he recently came out with a 3-volume movie on the topic. Again to invoke Einstein, "I want to know the mind of God, the rest is just commentary."
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
Yes a theory it is, which means that it is well-tested and proven.
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
Should we throw out the electron theory because the Bible doesn't mention them?
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
Creationism does not even rate as a theory, it is mere conjecture.
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
Why should any video convince anyone? If one wants to assert creationism, prove it. Period.
Originally posted by Aeon10101110
Does the video present a testable hypothesis?
Originally posted by iamian
Aeon
Is'nt everything a theory?
its up to us to hypothesis in what ever way we feel fit neither for nor against but to way up both sides of every argument the theory of evolution
is built on unstable foundations
Originally posted by iamian
lol, i agree on the point of pronunciation but what insults me is your attitude, its as if your right and everybody else is wrong,
to be truthfull nobody knows its a theory, creation or evolution decide for yourself but you must respect other ppls opinions.
1/ i'm always trying to educate myself on all matters.
2/ disinformation works both ways.
anyway i admire your honesty