NASA Photographed Building Rubble On Mars

page: 4
11
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 17 2013 @ 08:32 PM
link   
The picture without color.
sdrv.ms...
sdrv.ms...
edit on 17/7/2013 by pinobot because: (no reason given)




posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 10:01 AM
link   
An object i think is known as 'the wall'. It's not aways easy to see, on some pictures it even seems to be removed.
Don't know exactly where it begins and ends but this is roughly it.
sdrv.ms...

sdrv.ms...

Original: mars.jpl.nasa.gov...
edit on 18/7/2013 by pinobot because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 24 2013 @ 04:14 PM
link   
wrong post
edit on 24/7/2013 by pinobot because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2013 @ 05:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by rickymouse
Are you saying that the martians are as small as ants? I think those are small rocks.


Yes, the martians are very tiny-sized race of beings. They stand no more than 1.8mm tall and there are literally millions of them all over the planet. That's why you will have a very hard job to spot any of them in the Curiosity mastcam images but you may be able to spot some of their buildings and other structures that range from 3mm to 10mm in height. There are taller structures but these are few and far between. They are very artistic and if you look carefully at some of the rock faces you may be lucky to see some carvings sculpted into the rock surface of their own facial likeness. If you do spot any of the carvings you may be in for a big surprise.



posted on Jul, 26 2013 @ 11:20 AM
link   
reply to post by arianna
 





Yes, the martians are very tiny-sized race of beings. They stand no more than 1.8mm tall and there are literally millions of them all over the planet.


if you're not joking, would you have a link for this please?
thanks in advance
edit on 26/7/13 by SecretKnowledge because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2013 @ 11:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by SecretKnowledge
reply to post by arianna
 





Yes, the martians are very tiny-sized race of beings. They stand no more than 1.8mm tall and there are literally millions of them all over the planet.


if you're not joking, would you have a link for this please?
thanks in advance
edit on 26/7/13 by SecretKnowledge because: (no reason given)


Years ago whilst reseaching some of the Phoenix images for any signs of life I came across one particular image that was of interest and from what I can tell is the only one.

The image number is lg_7851 and shows what is on the 20mm plate located at the front of the excavation scoop. NASA decribed the material as being 'a rosy red soil sample', but how can the soil be 'rosy red' when that is not the colour of the martian soil. If you look up the image I would advise that members pay close attention to the detail in this particular view. I believe the image was captured during sol 31.



posted on Jul, 29 2013 @ 08:14 PM
link   
reply to post by pinobot
 


www.angelfire.com... What do you guys think about this pic? It's supposed to be an injured 'grey' who crashed. This is a photo of the autopsy.
edit on 29-7-2013 by WhiteNite because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 29 2013 @ 09:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by arianna
but how can the soil be 'rosy red' when that is not the colour of the martian soil.


Iron buildup or an abundance of red minerals. In reality you will get soils of every probably every colour in the geological rainbow on Mars.

Part of Scotland is dominated by something called the "Old red sandstone".



posted on Jul, 29 2013 @ 09:57 PM
link   
Yeah they are all rocks guys.

This for instance is:



Just an odd curved rock, kinda like if you knocked out part of this:



Or indeed, any process that can cause something like that to occur, which is a lot of them.

The white stuff on the ground will be crystals of quartz most likely.



I knew my degree would come in handy.

Really good to see people are get exited about rocks, if perhaps not the way I would prefer
edit on 29-7-2013 by rocksandstuff because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2013 @ 08:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by winofiend

Originally posted by n3mesis
if something is ever photographed.. believe me.. nasa or any other government agencies will not or ever allow it to be released to the public and as scrutinized as all the photos are they will never be "accidentally" released or leaked.


Why? what purpose would it serve to hide it? What would earthings demand if there were things on Mars that proved there was once intelligent life on it?


If evidence of ancient intelligent alien life was found on Mars then it would quite simply mean that all the human/earth-centric religions were completely deluded and wrong.



posted on Jul, 30 2013 @ 11:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by johnrobca

Originally posted by winofiend

Originally posted by n3mesis
if something is ever photographed.. believe me.. nasa or any other government agencies will not or ever allow it to be released to the public and as scrutinized as all the photos are they will never be "accidentally" released or leaked.


Why? what purpose would it serve to hide it? What would earthings demand if there were things on Mars that proved there was once intelligent life on it?


If evidence of ancient intelligent alien life was found on Mars then it would quite simply mean that all the human/earth-centric religions were completely deluded and wrong.


And if evidence was found of a civilized existence on the moon would you be of the same opinion?



posted on Jul, 30 2013 @ 01:47 PM
link   
Of all the ludicrous conspiracy theories on this site these "hidden Mars" photos baffle me the most. As if NASA just released the photographs with all the lost alien architecture and machinery and forgot to tell anybody? Like it would just slip under the radar?

Or that NASA can put people on the moon and advanced robots on Mars but can't hire a couple of schlubs to look through the photos and make sure to exclude all the ones with evidence of alien life that would turn the world on its head?



posted on Jul, 30 2013 @ 08:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Tetrarch42
 


Mars photos ain't ish man.. Check out the "hidden moon" photos
whether they slipped or not there is a lot of anomalies in the moon photos many of which are unexplainable. And NASA neither confirms or denies the stuff in those photos.



posted on Aug, 7 2013 @ 11:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by arianna

Originally posted by johnrobca

Originally posted by winofiend

Originally posted by n3mesis
if something is ever photographed.. believe me.. nasa or any other government agencies will not or ever allow it to be released to the public and as scrutinized as all the photos are they will never be "accidentally" released or leaked.


Why? what purpose would it serve to hide it? What would earthings demand if there were things on Mars that proved there was once intelligent life on it?


If evidence of ancient intelligent alien life was found on Mars then it would quite simply mean that all the human/earth-centric religions were completely deluded and wrong.


And if evidence was found of a civilized existence on the moon would you be of the same opinion?


HHHmmmmm interesting question ... I think it would depend on whether the civilized existence evolved on the moon or visited the moon from another planet ... even then using words like evolve doesnt sit well with many religions .... and then there is the possibility that the civilised existence came from earth ... and if it came from earth then theres a hidden history here on earth which would also possibly have an interesting impact on religions .... and then there would be the question of what they look like .... arent we made in Gods image?

So if I were to be pushed for a definative answer I would say that any life found outside the atmosphere of the earth would indicate that earth/human centric religions are flawed. That is based on my understanding of earth/human centric religions. For me, if there is a God, he/she created everything including aliens and it is only our own arrogance that makes us believe we are so important.

Id be interested to hear from a creationist on this subject as I am only throwing out my thoughts and opinion, which doesnt mean its correct
edit on 7-8-2013 by johnrobca because: shocking spelling





new topics
top topics
 
11
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join