It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by benrl
Originally posted by muse7
I'm okay with them they are useful in catching illegals and drug smugglers
So lets say you ran over a joint on the road, and a k9 gets a positive, OR at least thats what the cop claims.
Your okay with Jim-bo bob the state trooper with a large state trooper gloved hand, which has zero medical training exploring your anus and lower intestine digitally?
Wow your willingness to give up dignity for safety is amazing.
ME, I may have a problem with that, which would probably end up in violence or worse for me.
Originally posted by Ghost375
reply to post by Habit4ming
The fourth amendment is not some blanket right that prevents you from being searched.
, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
That bolded part is what makes this case legal, per constitution.
I don't know about the precedent for doing the search in public, but they had probable cause for sure.
, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
Originally posted by Terminal1
Originally posted by Ghost375
reply to post by Terminal1
I'm sorry. You're wrong. Both the rules of grammar and countless legal precedents say I'm right.
Agree to disagree then.
Would like someone else to chime in or if I had the time (curses of night shift) I'd create a thread.