It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by biggmoneyme
i say hang them. the word of a cop being executed for something like this will travel farther than a cop being convicted. knowing your life is on the line will ensure the police do their job correctly
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by biggmoneyme
i say hang them. the word of a cop being executed for something like this will travel farther than a cop being convicted. knowing your life is on the line will ensure the police do their job correctly
This is America not the ME.
If we started doing something dumb like hanging cops for mistakes we wouldn’t have cops. Maybe that’s what you want but the rest of us don’t want that; we need police. We just don’t need police who violate our Constitutional rights.
Originally posted by joer4x4
The Constitution is the highest law. All subsequent laws, on any level must comply. If they don't then those responsible are lawbreakers themselves. The only way to change it is by amendment.
Originally posted by Ghost375
reply to post by Habit4ming
The fourth amendment is not some blanket right that prevents you from being searched.
, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
That bolded part is what makes this case legal, per constitution.
I don't know about the precedent for doing the search in public, but they had probable cause for sure.
Originally posted by MrInquisitive
reply to post by jude11
Hmm, in Texuz no less. Would the same have been done to white women? I SERIOUSLY DOUBT IT. I hope the disgusting pigs involved lose their life savings in the pending lawsuits. The female ex-cop, who apparently didn't change gloves between searches, should also be charged with any other appropriate counts, including inflicting intentional bodily harm, and practicing medicine without a license. Throw the book at her.
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by Nephalim
Why do we really care what color the women might be? I don't care if they are white, black, brown, yellow, green purple.......... Wrong is wrong, we all bleed red FFS.....
Originally posted by MrInquisitive
reply to post by jude11
Hmm, in Texuz no less. Would the same have been done to white women? I SERIOUSLY DOUBT IT. I hope the disgusting pigs involved lose their life savings in the pending lawsuits. The female ex-cop, who apparently didn't change gloves between searches, should also be charged with any other appropriate counts, including inflicting intentional bodily harm, and practicing medicine without a license. Throw the book at her.
Originally posted by Habit4ming
Well, I just wrote a rather long comment, which conveniently is gone! I will not take the time to do it again. This behavior was not legal, it's against the 4th Amendment. In addition, Marbury vs. Madison says that 'laws against the Constitution are in and of themselves null and void'. "They" can make any law, but that does not make it Constitutional (the Supreme Law of the Land) nor necessarily right! Maybe "they" will make a law that the federal government owns all property. How about that? It would be legal, right?
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by jude11
One officer was fired. Why are you asking people to defend what was already determing to be wrong and resulted in termination? Why are you acting like the police are justifying it when they are not?
Originally posted by jude11
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by jude11
One officer was fired. Why are you asking people to defend what was already determing to be wrong and resulted in termination? Why are you acting like the police are justifying it when they are not?
I'm sorry but I'm lost.
Please show me where I state "Police are justifying it". In fact, no one posting has even come close to this statement.
Unless you are just posting for the sake of posting.
Peace
Please note at 1:50 on the vid that comments were not available because of the holidays. Yay!
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by jude11
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by jude11
One officer was fired. Why are you asking people to defend what was already determing to be wrong and resulted in termination? Why are you acting like the police are justifying it when they are not?
I'm sorry but I'm lost.
Please show me where I state "Police are justifying it". In fact, no one posting has even come close to this statement.
Unless you are just posting for the sake of posting.
Peace
And I quote ...
All they have to say is "Reasonable Suspicion" and the violations begin.
Please note at 1:50 on the vid that comments were not available because of the holidays. Yay!
Go ahead...defend it. I dare you.
Peace
Please note at 1:50 on the vid that comments were not available because of the holidays. Yay!
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by ThreeBears
So no one gets fired, the police don't care. Someone gets fired. Police don't care. Thank you for clarifying that no matter if the dept. takes action you don't care.
As for suing, she should, and she should win.