It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
At least 10 people are in critical condition.
Two people were killed and 61 injured in the crash of an Asiana Boeing 777 airline at San Francisco International Airport Saturday morning, according to a dispatcher for the San Francisco Fire Department.
Pilot Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger said that the construction on the SFO runway could have been a factor in the crash.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to post by Zaphod58
Unfortunately initial reports of no fatalities may have been wrong:
millbrae.patch.com...
At least 10 people are in critical condition.
Two people were killed and 61 injured in the crash of an Asiana Boeing 777 airline at San Francisco International Airport Saturday morning, according to a dispatcher for the San Francisco Fire Department.
I thought those planes could practically land themselves? Or is that plane too old for that technology? But if the airport was under construction, if there wasn't ILS for that the landing would have to be manual?
Pilot Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger said that the construction on the SFO runway could have been a factor in the crash.
Apparently no one was killed.
Just as I thought which is regrettable and very very sad.
Originally posted by piequal3because14
reply to post by woodwardjnr
Unfortunately these type of accidents has a big number of victims,which is not good
Apparently the tail dropped off and the plane flipped over, from eye witness reports
This also will be confirmed in weeks maybe months.
Originally posted by piequal3because14
Because the maintenance begins to be.... in whole context.
Originally posted by opethPA
Originally posted by piequal3because14
reply to post by Zaphod58
This is not good by the number of events starting to unfold.
Reports: 777 crash lands at San Francisco,
Because planes have not crashed since they were first engineered?
Originally posted by smurfy
Fos news had a live link above the crash site, unfortunately it is no longer available, but I did see it when live.
live.foxnews.com... it is clear that the aircraft came to rest not much further than the start of the runway, and off the runway to the right. All the tail sections are removed before the runway start, with some part/s in the waterway.
Because the maintenance begins to be.... in whole context. This also will be confirmed in weeks maybe months.
Originally posted by piequal3because14
Because planes have not crashed since they were first engineered?