It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jiggerj
It was only believed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. It was only believed that these invisible WMD's were a threat to the world. So we decimated the country and made sure Saddam Hussein got very dead. No weapons, no threat, but Hussein is still very dead.
Kim Jung Un definitely has weapons of mass destruction, and he definitely threatened the world with them. And yet the little fat boy has yet to receive that much needed hole in his head. Why?
Originally posted by grubblesnert
reply to post by jiggerj
Ask China.
I have a feeling they would react VERY strongly to an invasion of a former allie right next door to them.
Executive Order 12333 forbids assasination of Foreign Leaders.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by grubblesnert
reply to post by jiggerj
Ask China.
I have a feeling they would react VERY strongly to an invasion of a former allie right next door to them.
In these times of spies and sharp-shooters, I'm just talking about taking out the lunatic leader. Do you honestly think the NK people would complain? They're scared to death of him.
Originally posted by JiggyPotamus
This is definitely a hypocritical move on the part of the US president G.W. Bush. Here is what this is proof of, in my opinion...That while the US claims to be the "good guy" in all fights, the truth is much more sinister. The truth of why we invaded Iraq had nothing to do with WMD's. In fact, it has been PROVEN now that Bush and his cronies in the White House KNEW that there was ZERO intelligence suggesting WMD's in Iraq. And therefore this PROVES that the government will use a false flag event, or attempt to sell something to the US public based on lies. Why wasn't Bush prosecuted for this lying to the people?
Does anyone remember the crap the Republicans threw out because Clinton lied to the people about what he did? Since they could not argue with the fact that what he does in his personal life is really none of their business, they tried to say it was because he lied about it. Yet Bush tells a much larger lie, and lie that cost the US trillions of dollars, and more importantly, many soldiers' lives, yet where are these supposedly "moral" republicans? They are not saying a word about this.
Poppycock. It was all his fault the moment he took the oath of office. And until it gets changed, it will remain his fault. And when a new President is elected, it will be his fault, too. Until he fixes it (which won't happen).
Yet they are quiick to criticise everything Obama does, even when it is not his fault.
So can someone tell me how some people, namely the whole republican party, can be so ignorant and biased? If they would at least stop claiming the moral high ground, when the truth is that they do nothing because it is moral. So why did Bush go into Iraq? Well do you know how much money he made for both his family and his friends? All of those government contracts, things like oil, and supplying things Iraq as well? BILLIONS of dollars. And all of that money went into the Bush family coffers, and into the hands of giant corporations who were awarded GOVERNMENT money, YOUR money, in contracts. Bush used his presidency to make so many people rich, everyone except the people, and republicans now want to complain because Obama is trying to help people? They cannot have that. They say everyone feels entitled, when the truth is that it is themselves who think they are entitled to everything. The proof is in the story I just related of Bush.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by grubblesnert
reply to post by jiggerj
Ask China.
I have a feeling they would react VERY strongly to an invasion of a former allie right next door to them.
In these times of spies and sharp-shooters, I'm just talking about taking out the lunatic leader. Do you honestly think the NK people would complain? They're scared to death of him.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Kim Jung Un definitely has weapons of mass destruction, and he definitely threatened the world with them. And yet the little fat boy has yet to receive that much needed hole in his head. Why?
Originally posted by grubblesnert
Executive Order 12333 forbids assasination of Foreign Leaders.
So........it aint gonna happen under US sanction. well at least not officially
Part 2.11 of this executive order reiterates a proscription on US intelligence agencies sponsoring or carrying out an assassination. It reads:[5] No person employed by or acting on behalf of the United States Government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, assassination. Previously, EO 11905 (Gerald Ford) had banned political assassinations and EO 12036 (Jimmy Carter) had further banned indirect U.S. involvement in assassinations.[6] As early as 1998, this proscription against assassination was reinterpreted, and relaxed, for targets who are classified by the United States as connected to terrorism.[
Welll then...make yourself a copy of this section of 12333, and this thread including your statement:
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by grubblesnert
Executive Order 12333 forbids assasination of Foreign Leaders.
So........it aint gonna happen under US sanction. well at least not officially
From Wiki: Order 12333
Part 2.11 of this executive order reiterates a proscription on US intelligence agencies sponsoring or carrying out an assassination. It reads:[5] No person employed by or acting on behalf of the United States Government shall engage in, or conspire to engage in, assassination. Previously, EO 11905 (Gerald Ford) had banned political assassinations and EO 12036 (Jimmy Carter) had further banned indirect U.S. involvement in assassinations.[6] As early as 1998, this proscription against assassination was reinterpreted, and relaxed, for targets who are classified by the United States as connected to terrorism.[
LOL If the order can be reinterpreted and relaxed then it's not much of an order. Plus, if what the NK leader did wasn't terrorism, I don't know what is. I sure felt terrorized that the world was going into a nuclear war.edit on 7/7/2013 by jiggerj because: (no reason given)
Welll then...make yourself a copy of this section of 12333, and this thread including your statement: fold them up and put it in your back pocket. ( your get out of jail free card) Get yourself on over to to North Korean and get to work!
Your OPs premise is based on bias and lack of knowledge.
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by grubblesnert
Welll then...make yourself a copy of this section of 12333, and this thread including your statement: fold them up and put it in your back pocket. ( your get out of jail free card) Get yourself on over to to North Korean and get to work!
This said nothing. What is your point, if you have one?
Originally posted by grubblesnert
Your OPs premise is based on bias and lack of knowledge.
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by grubblesnert
Welll then...make yourself a copy of this section of 12333, and this thread including your statement: fold them up and put it in your back pocket. ( your get out of jail free card) Get yourself on over to to North Korean and get to work!
This said nothing. What is your point, if you have one?
The sole porpose of which, I surmise, is to either garner like minded bias and inflamatory responses to stroke your own ego
or, In my case, respond with shallow minded ire.
My point being, if your so convinced your logic and passion is justified go over there and do it! (it was humor)
It appears you want no one to "explain this to me" as you request in your threads title. Only to wallow in your own vitriol and close mindedness.
What say ye ole' sad one?
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by grubblesnert
Welll then...make yourself a copy of this section of 12333, and this thread including your statement: fold them up and put it in your back pocket. ( your get out of jail free card) Get yourself on over to to North Korean and get to work!
This said nothing. What is your point, if you have one?