It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AndyMayhew
reply to post by libertytoall
I believe that you are what is known as a denier
You want proof, yet you reject scientific method.
Ask yourself: if science says a and b and c and d cause e, then how can you be so sure that c doesn't cause e? No-one (apart from some deniers) say that climate doesn't change naturally. But can you be so very very very sure that absolutely nothing humans do: black soot, urbansisation, deforestation, etc, has any effect whatsoever on climate. Ever?!!!!! You are absolutely 100% certain?
Just like Al Gore and ALL THE REST OF THE PEOPLE WHO GOT CAUGHT MISREPRESENTING SCIENCE
John Cook and Skeptical science are a laughing stock of the scientific community
Because skeptical science is a ideologically driven website funded by Al Gore
It's true the inconvenient truth of man made driven climate models is the need to suppress measuring anything leading up to the industrial revolution in order to achieve the ridiculous skyrocketing trend
I'm not going to be bated into responding to anymore of your nonsensical science beliefs that are based on OPINIONATED BULLSH*T until you can provide the smoking gun link
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by libertytoall
Why should I provide more sources on any given aspect of AGW if you're going to continue to ignore the sources I've already given?
Originally posted by libertytoall
I'm willing to accept our activities can effect the climate but to say WE are the MAIN driving factor in climate change is highly irresponsible and at least deceptive.. Total human greenhouse gas contributions are about .0035%. How is that the MAIN DRIVING FACTOR in climate change?
Also, how is it industrialization is the main driving factor in the climate models when the trends began long before any industrialization took place??
The CO2 levels have been much higher in the past when humans lived.
Why did warming stand still and then this year ice sheets experience a record thickening?
If humans are the main driving factor in climate change while accounting for .0035% of greenhouse gases, does that mean the other 99% are somehow NOTdriving factors in climate change?? How does that make any sense?? It's very confusing..
Anyone with logic and common sense would say the doom and gloom man made climate change blamers have quite some explaining to do.. Meanwhile when you blame solar activity amazingly all the models line up perfect, there is no contradictions, and even less unanswered questions. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it's a duck. Solar activity looks and sounds like a duck. Man made climate change looks and sounds like a schmuck..
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by mc_squared
Well, that's a thoughtful and well considered reply. I'll be back with something equally thought out and carefully considered to address your points. It may be a bit as I have a ton going today...as some may have noticed my lack of posting recently. Indeed.. I'll certainly live up to my own side of the statements regarding support and reliable sourcing tho. Star for you!