posted on Jul, 13 2013 @ 09:49 AM
reply to post by micpsi
Debunkers don't have to prove anything, because the "chemtrail" believers are the ones who are making claims. When you say that something contains
something, you need proof of some type, like a lab test, carefully sampled. Instead we get "prove they don't exist," which is logically
There are decades of science study involving clouds, atmospheric sciences, aviation sciences, physics, fluid dynamics, engineering, chemistry, even
mineralogy that defines what is seen behind planes and what that something contains. So far, it has been shown to contain water as ice crystals and
the expected byproducts of jet fuel combusting in a jet engine. Time after time after time.
If these studies are wrong, prove it. They all have survived peer review so far. Perhaps your expertise can find an error. Searching Google for
"contrail studies -chemtrails" gets 144,000 hits. Choose one. Show it is wrong.