It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by FyreByrd
The original intend of law was to protect individual people from power/money backed 'opinion'.
Could you source that for me? Because power/money backed "opinion" is pretty much the norm in DC.
Main articles: Ma'at, Babylonian law, Ancient Greek law, and Leviticus
See also: Urukagina, Hittite laws, and Ostracism
Ancient Egyptian law, dating as far back as 3000 BC, had a civil code that was probably broken into twelve books. It was based on the concept of Ma'at, characterised by tradition, rhetorical speech, social equality and impartiality. [1] By the 22nd century BC, Ur-Nammu, an ancient Sumerian ruler, formulated the first law code, consisting of casuistic statements ("if... then..."). Around 1760 BC, King Hammurabi further developed Babylonian law, by codifying and inscribing it in stone. Hammurabi placed several copies of his law code throughout the kingdom of Babylon as stelae, for the entire public to see; this became known as the Codex Hammurabi. The most intact copy of these stelae was discovered in the 19th century by British Assyriologists, and has since been fully transliterated and translated into various languages, including English, German and French. Ancient Athens, the small Greek city-state, was the first society based on broad inclusion of the citizenry, excluding women and the slave class. Ancient Greek has no word for "law" as an abstract concept,[2] retaining instead the distinction between divine law (thémis), human decree (nomos) and custom (díkē).[3] Yet Ancient Greek law contained major constitutional innovations in the development of democracy.[4]
Originally posted by VoidHawk
A womens body is HER body, how dare those scumbags think its any business of theirs
Originally posted by WaterBottle
Men, particularly of the right wing persuasion, want control over a woman's body and sexuality.
There is a reason why they are obsessed with 1776, they want to society to return to when they reigned supreme and unchallenged.
edit on 4-7-2013 by WaterBottle because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by WaterBottle
Why are right wingers supposedly small government until it becomes convenient to be otherwise?
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by Logarock
Yeah, that is the way the fetuses used to look like when it was coat hanger abortions, many women lost their lives with that method and to think that it was when men used to dominate their women.
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by Logarock
I believe this happens a lot in this time and age, but back when women didn't have much rights, for many the choice to avoid having soo many children were back ally abortions that even if they were married.