posted on Jul, 4 2013 @ 08:16 AM
There is no one I can say I trust absolutely, only partially. That seems to be the problem with some here - you start believing someone and whatever
they say becomes the truth for you.
My reason for thinking the UFOs, some of them may not be of human origin is based on evaluation of so many accounts, documents, secrecy, people coming
forward, incidents - each researcher can have some good thoughts. I can dismiss that the UFO is a coverup for some human technology because some cases
that are proven fact as happening describe things that seem beyond anything man made. Also there is nothing man-made to have such a level of secrecy
and 'false UFO stories' - there is no reason to try so hard for 60 years misleading people with false stories, something there is real. I don't
know what exactly
Whenever I watch someone talking I decide on my own what part I agree with and what not, that's how I have no idols there.
Some people demand more facts and evidence - are there no such cases, tell me? There is enough evidence to show some unknown aircraft did
land/crash/left traces on the ground from all cases.
Have in mind that with the documents declassified - you can see there is much more to release and more secret. I'm sure there is plenty of evidence
good enough for scientific study but someone still has to release the better evidence than what we now see.
edit on 4-7-2013 by ImpactoR
because: (no reason given)