posted on Jul, 5 2013 @ 08:43 AM
When ever confronted with facts these 'speculations' fall flat. 77 Senators vote for the Iraq war including all the members of the Armed Services
Committee. They had the same exact intelligence that the White House had so they must be included in your conspiracy. Senators Reid, Schumer,
Feinstein are just a few you must include in your plot to kill 3,000 Americans just to go after Saddam.
Lawrence Wright won a Pulitzer prize for his work on the lead up to 9/11. There is simply no room in his timeline for any 'conspiracy' type
nonsense about the President and his staff knowing full well this event was coming and deciding to profit from it-along with the entire Senate, House,
FBI, and numerous other 'alphabet' services taking part. It's simply looney and somewhat sick.
Granted, his book is hard to understand without some knowledge of Arabic, Islamic culture and history of the region. Continuing to use John O'Neill
-a proud American that died for his country-in your various plots is even more repulsive than insinuating the Entire Executive and Legislative
branches of the American Government set this up to profit from the stock market.
Obliviously, most of you know very little about the fine art of signal communications in war or peacetime. Admittedly, my knowledge is from events 60
years past however that fails to change the fact that 90% of all wartime communication is for deception. It's not about breaking codes or listening
in to conversations-it's about rendering the false from the true. All the data mining, surveillance and communication interception is worthless
without agents on the ground to confirm the validity of the information.
That is why agents like Ali Soufan are so credible in their information because they were there to confirm the intelligence that was being
Why the current Administration didn't come out and say this once the NSA story broke is a massive mystery. They are either hiding something,
completely incompetent or both.