It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Unquestionably, one of the most famous men associated with S4 (Sector - 4) is physicist Bob Lazar. Robert Scott Lazar was born in Coral Gables, Florida, in 1959 and is a name numerous people associate with alien spaceship reverse engineering .
Element 115:
Bob Lazar stated that the “Sport Model” Flying Disc amplified the “Strong Nuclear Force” of Element 115 (UnUnPentium or UUP) to generate the gravity field for “Space-Time Compression.” Bob also stated that the U.S. Government had 500 pounds of Element 115 in their possession.
The raw Element 115 was given to the U.S. Goverment at S4 by the Reticulan EBEs (Extraterrestrial Biological Entity) in the form of discs. The scientists at S4 sent the Element 115 discs through Groom Lake to Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, to be milled for use in the Anti-Matter Reactor.
The Los Alamos personnel were told it was a new form of armor. They simply followed orders, milled it in accordance with the following steps, and sent it back to Groom Lake
As a Senior Research Engineer Boyd Bushman worked for Lockheed Martin, Texas Instruments and Hughes Aircraft. He is regarded as one of the inventors of the Stinger missile and he speaks on Camera about Area 51 and advanced propulsion systems being tested there.
2004 Scientific breakthrough provide credibility to Bob Lazar’s claims:
In Lazar's first interview he talked about Element 115. Fifteen years later in 2004 scientific breakthrough, however, provides significant credibility to Bob Lazar’s claims rather than discrediting his claims, when scientists at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, in collaboration with researchers from the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Russia (JINR), announced that they discovered two new super-heavy elements, Element 113 and Element 115. The Isotope of Element 115, produced by bombarding an Americium-243 (95Am243) nucleus with a Calcium-48 (20Ca48) nucleus, rapidly decayed to Element 113. then continued to decay until a meta-stable isotope was obtained.
NASA Antimatter Reactor
In 2006 NASA had officially talked about "Antimatter reactor " too, down below is what they had said:
"Some antimatter reactions produce blasts of high energy gamma rays. Gamma rays are like X-rays on steroids. They penetrate matter and break apart molecules in cells, so they are not healthy to be around. High-energy gamma rays can also make the engines radioactive by fragmenting atoms of the engine material.
I maintain that Lazar is a 'gatekeeper'. Far too dodgy, just like Lear.
Originally posted by Diablos
If you want a complete refutation of Lazar's fantasy physics, I suggest you read this piece by Dr David Morgan, a real physicist.
Not knowing any real physics, Lazar has contradicted himself so many times, much to the dismay of what little credibility he had to begin with.
Originally posted by awakehuman
Originally posted by Diablos
If you want a complete refutation of Lazar's fantasy physics, I suggest you read this piece by Dr David Morgan, a real physicist.
Not knowing any real physics, Lazar has contradicted himself so many times, much to the dismay of what little credibility he had to begin with.
So you mean to say Lockheed Martin's senior scientist is "Lying" I even provided the NASA link as proof but if you still skeptic, I don't care.edit on 2-7-2013 by awakehuman because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Freezer
Originally posted by awakehuman
Originally posted by Diablos
If you want a complete refutation of Lazar's fantasy physics, I suggest you read this piece by Dr David Morgan, a real physicist.
Not knowing any real physics, Lazar has contradicted himself so many times, much to the dismay of what little credibility he had to begin with.
So you mean to say Lockheed Martin's senior scientist is "Lying" I even provided the NASA link as proof but if you still skeptic, I don't care.edit on 2-7-2013 by awakehuman because: (no reason given)
Actually in a interview, Bushman stated that he thought Lazar was lying and throwing in some truths to try and make it believable, in order lure in others with more knowledge to come forward, as a baiting tactic.
Originally posted by torsion
Here's Stanton Friedman's take on Lazar.
The Bob Lazar Fraud
Originally posted by torsion
Here's Stanton Friedman's take on Lazar.
The Bob Lazar Fraud
Originally posted by awakehuman
Originally posted by torsion
Here's Stanton Friedman's take on Lazar.
The Bob Lazar Fraud
Important here is, what's your view on Bob Lazar and Lockheed Martin's Senior Scientist ?
Do you think Bob Lazar and scientist both are LYING ?edit on 2-7-2013 by awakehuman because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by torsion
Originally posted by awakehuman
Originally posted by torsion
Here's Stanton Friedman's take on Lazar.
The Bob Lazar Fraud
Important here is, what's your view on Bob Lazar and Lockheed Martin's Senior Scientist ?
Do you think Bob Lazar and scientist both are LYING ?edit on 2-7-2013 by awakehuman because: (no reason given)
It certainly look that way as there's no real evidence that he (Lazar) speaks the truth in relation to flying saucers. And the fact that David Sereda is interviewing Bushman is another credibility killer.
Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by awakehuman
What is your relationship with ufo-blogger.com ? ...every thread you post in this forum uses that as your source and to be honest most of the stuff there is BS .
Conspiracy or what
Anyways what you think about Bob Lazar ?
Originally posted by awakehuman
Which is not correct, he talked about 115 and Antimatter reactor which was never been discussed before in public.
Originally posted by awakehuman
Originally posted by torsion
Here's Stanton Friedman's take on Lazar.
The Bob Lazar Fraud
Important here is, what's your view on Bob Lazar and Lockheed Martin's Senior Scientist ?
Do you think Bob Lazar and scientist both are LYING ?edit on 2-7-2013 by awakehuman because: (no reason given)