It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Flaw In Your Logic Regarding Homosexuality

page: 15
19
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by AQuestion
reply to post by HairlessApe
 


Dear HairlessApe,



Again guys... I believe in common courtesy too... But this is about what you have the right to do, not what you find icky or not.


I am a libertarian mostly. I would not outlaw public displays of affection. As for what people have a right to do. I shall reiterate something I have said many times before. Government sanctioned marriage is nothing more than a contract. As such it should be available to all consenting adults. Personally, I don't think the government sanctioned contract of marriage is useful, I think it is used to make sure that the government doesn't have to provide services, like welfare, if they can get your ex-partner to do it. Should I ever choose to be with someone again, it will not require nor involve a "legal" marriage.


I'm a little confused. I do believe everyone has the right to get married. If you're going for the "respect the Bible's terms of marriage and settle for a legal marriage instead" arguement, I have only this to say... Marriage is not defined in the Bible as a single man and a single woman. That's a cop-out. These are the various definitions in the Bible regarding a proper marriage.



Included are the books and verses which mention these proper types of Biblical marriage, so if you don't believe me you can easily look it up for yourself.

I would also like to include the fact that many Christians say the Old Testament is no longer relevant. If that's true, then "one man and one woman" is also irrelevant, as it's in the Old Testament.
edit on 2-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)




posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by BDBinc

Originally posted by tony9802
[

Babies are not born homosexual
Second call for evidence.



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by captaintyinknots

Originally posted by BDBinc

Originally posted by tony9802
[

Babies are not born homosexual
Second call for evidence.



50 bucks says he won't even reply to my post.

Edit: If anyone would like to see what I'm referring to, I posted a fair amount of evidence for BDB to counter on the page before this one. (page 14)

edit on 2-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by HairlessApe

Originally posted by captaintyinknots

Originally posted by BDBinc

Originally posted by tony9802
[

Babies are not born homosexual
Second call for evidence.



50 bucks says he won't even reply to my post.

Edit: If anyone would like to see what I'm referring to, I posted a heap of evidence for BDB to counter on the page before this one.
edit on 2-7-2013 by HairlessApe because: (no reason given)
Im with ya, posters such as this will NEVER submit to the burden of proof. Which is really all the answer we need.



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:31 PM
link   
Nope it is you that have failed to prove your claim that babies are homosexual as they are not, nor have you provided me with any evidence.
You have also claimed homosexuality in man is natural because animals hump.

edit on 2-7-2013 by BDBinc because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by eletheia
reply to post by tony9802
 





Apparently digital sex is already here


I am a novice in all this technology, way beyond me! but even I know it's already here


Yes, I'm actually aware of that too.. kind of scary I would say, but I have not seen images of the "machines, or devices." I actually would not want to look.

I do know there's a movie out about it. The powers that be can normalize and popularize these devices you know. By the way, say Hi and Cheers to the Uk out there for me, I've met nice people from there..



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:33 PM
link   
reply to post by BDBinc
 


Third call for proof.

This thread is FULL of evidence to back the claim that it is from birth. You have presented not even ONE piece of evidence to back your claim that no babies are born gay.

You are shucking the burden of proof.



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by BDBinc


Nope it is you that have failed to prove your claim that babies are homosexual as they are not, nor have you provided me with any evidence.
You have also claimed homosexuality in man is natural because animals hump.

edit on 2-7-2013 by BDBinc because: (no reason given)


Could you use another word other than h*mp? How about if I choose one for you..
Animals "mount" one another. Now there's a good word and option for you!



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:34 PM
link   
reply to post by BDBinc
 


Evidence? Tons of it. All over this thread. Here's another:

My 21 year old son, i knew he was going to be gay when he was just under 2 years old.



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:36 PM
link   
reply to post by HairlessApe
 

Babies are not homosexual you claimed they were so its up to you to prove your claims.
Still waiting for proof of your claim why animals humping makes homosexuality in man natural.




posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by BDBinc
reply to post by HairlessApe
 

Babies are not homosexual you claimed they were so its up to you to prove your claims.
Still waiting for proof of your claim why animals humping makes homosexuality in man natural.

The evidence has been presented. Either admit you have none to back up your claim, or present it. Those really are the only two ways about it.

This is the fourth call.
edit on 2-7-2013 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:38 PM
link   
reply to post by tony9802
 

OK can do ...
when the OP said that animals mount other same sex animals means homosexuality in man is natural.Sounds even worse!



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by captaintyinknots

Originally posted by BDBinc

Originally posted by tony9802
[

Babies are not born homosexual
Second call for evidence.



The evidence is in the knowing. Simply put, from very very early ages, gay folk simply know they are gay! By the way Hairlessape has already given you quite a bit of scientific data as evidence you just need to look above (see the page number?) and read what he offered as information and evidence.
edit on 2-7-2013 by tony9802 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:39 PM
link   
I do not have to prove the OP's claims as I am disagreeing with them as they lack logic and reason.



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by tony9802

Originally posted by captaintyinknots

Originally posted by BDBinc

Originally posted by tony9802
[

Babies are not born homosexual
Second call for evidence.



The evidence is in the knowing. Some people have this sixth sense or something, and from very early ages, gay folk simply know they are gay! By the way Hairlessape has already given you quite a bit of scientific data as evidence you just need to look above (see the page number?) and read what he offered as information and evidence.
You missed it. Read my posts again. I am asking BDBinc to back his claim.



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by BDBinc
I do not have to prove the OP's claims as I am disagreeing with them as they lack logic and reason.
Nope, you need to prove yours. Your claim is that no babies are born gay. Plenty of evidence has been presented to back that they are.

Either you can back it, or you cant. Its that simple. We have shown our evidence.

So where's yours?

6th call.
edit on 2-7-2013 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:41 PM
link   
How has the OP proved his claim that animals mounting same sex animals proves homosexuality in man is natural?



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:42 PM
link   
Reply to post by BDBinc
Why the deflection? You were very staunch in your claim that no babies were born gay. Why, now, do you only focus on the topic of animals?
edit on 2-7-2013 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:42 PM
link   
reply to post by HairlessApe
 


Dear HairlessApe,



I'm a little confused. I do believe everyone has the right to get married. If you're going for the "respect the Bible's terms of marriage and settle for a legal marriage instead" arguement, I have only this to say... Marriage is not defined in the Bible as a single man and a single woman. That's a cop-out. These are the various definitions in the Bible regarding a proper marriage.


I don't know why you are confused by what I said because you clearly think I am against gay marriage and I am not. When some people talk about gay marriage, they discuss it as if it is about God and it is not. What we think of as marriage is merely a government sanctioned contract. That is not a cop-out, it is the issue. What contracts should the government legally enforce. Many gays want to be able to get the "legal" benefits of marriage and I think they should if they wish to.

As for marriage being between a man and a woman, I never said that. Again I think you are mistaking where I am coming from. Marriage is a lifelong commitment to another human. In the bible people would often having multiple wives and concubines.



posted on Jul, 2 2013 @ 07:44 PM
link   
MY claim are against the OP statement's that he has provided you with no proof of
Human babies are not born homosexual.
1) It does not follow from animals humping same sex that homosexuality in man is natural .



new topics

top topics



 
19
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join