reply to post by Daedalus
Thanks for responding. There are several rebuttals I would like to make.
Let's start with where you quoted me saying "oh, he had an alcohol problem", or "oh, he had a drug problem". What you really need to do is back and
copy and past Exactly what I said. Some people here take it personally when you quote them In your Own Words. Regardless of either being past tense
the facts remain that he was admitted to both alcohol usage and drug usage. You say that I " would rather marginalize the man" when that is not even
the case. I clearly stated facts that are potential causes for what happened. I am not saying that it is what caused the accident but it does need to
be considered. Weather he was or wasn't on either that night will be determined when the toxicology report is published. So how will you feel when the
published findings show that he had high levels of either in his system? Are you going to say that his samples were tampered with?
You have also not proven in any way, shape, or form, that his car was not remotely tampered with (ie: hacked)
You are right, however, while you are going back to quote me on the other 2 items, you might as well grab the part where I mentioned that any evidence
regarding the Hacking, Tampering, or Explosives will be published when the investigation is complete.
completely discounting the presence of explosive materials, simply because nobody said anything about smells in the video is ludicrous
Then apparently you know nothing of explosives so I will fill you in. Although there were items burning that would have emitted odors as well, the
smell of explosives would have been prevalent immediately after the explosion. Before the other items would have had the chance to catch fire. With
the exception of the gasoline, which also has a very distinct odor.
As far as the transmission goes you have been very keen at pointing out that it would have had to go through the tree. My calculation and theory on
that is Highly plausible. At this point No One Including yourself has even bothered to offer an explanation of how the tranny and engine landed where
it did. How about if you offer your theory on how it landed there. I would be very interested in hearing it.
While you are offering your theory on the transmission/engine ejection please do take the time to produce and exhibit this "mountain of evidence" that
you say proves that he was murdered. I would be Extremely interested in entertaining that as well.
you're also making a huge leap, and assuming that the investigation will be done above board
Of course I expect the investigation will be above board. In fact I will bet money that it will be. To suggest that either the evidence or data will
be tampered with is completely asinine. There are several different agencies/groups handling the investigation. It would not be easy by any stretch to
Unless, as was talked about in the DARPA presentation, a custom firmware is installed, or the stock firmware was corrupted.
If you had watched the video you would have seen that the bluetooth does require a physical connection through the OBD-II pass-through device. If you
have evidence to prove otherwise please post that as well. I am not talking about things you have heard. I am talking about cold hard facts that have
been documented. You are correct about bluetooth being a wireless standard, but, it has to be accessed through the OBD-II pass-through device.
In addition for your sake, I wanted to post this again in case you missed it. . ..
I also think this is Extremely important to add. . .. . .
When the facts come to light how many people do you suspect are going to jump on the 'ol "Alphabet Agency got to the investigators and made them
concoct a story" bandwagon?
My guess is many. Especially when they show facts that prove it was either a true mechanical failure or operator error. Everyone who believes in the
conspiracy theory is going say that the Data Was Bought or Manufactured.
Now, go get your evidence and theory and find your way back as I am anxious to examine them both.
edit on 2-7-2013 by ShadellacZumbrum because: (no reason given)