It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
He paraphrased a couple of lines from Isaiah, according to Luke, and quoted some from Isaiah as a criticism, according to Matthew. That would have been necessary to persuade the Jews to accept him as being an agent of God, according to how they understood what God was. That is not the same as applying everything Isaiah ever said to himself.
Jesus affirmed Isaiah.
According to Acts, the earliest Christians were giving speeches to Jews which used allusions from the Old Testament. In the actual writings of real Apostles, they don't play such a prominent role.
And the apostles taught Christianity from the OT. The NT wasn't even written yet when they began the church.
What do you expect when you seem so far off into some delusional world, believing in magical Nephilim, and pretending like no "normal" people were killed in the flood.
Now you denigrate to personal attacks.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
He paraphrased a couple of lines from Isaiah, according to Luke, and quoted some from Isaiah as a criticism, according to Matthew. That would have been necessary to persuade the Jews to accept him as being an agent of God, according to how they understood what God was. That is not the same as applying everything Isaiah ever said to himself.
Jesus affirmed Isaiah.According to Acts, the earliest Christians were giving speeches to Jews which used allusions from the Old Testament. In the actual writings of real Apostles, they don't play such a prominent role.
And the apostles taught Christianity from the OT. The NT wasn't even written yet when they began the church.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
What do you expect when you seem so far off into some delusional world, believing in magical Nephilim, and pretending like no "normal" people were killed in the flood.
Now you denigrate to personal attacks.
Originally posted by freedom12
My god, my god......why have you forsaken me?
or
Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?
No, it doesn't, no matter what your cult leader tells you.
Well, because Genesis 6 says God sent the flood to kill the Nephillim.
I was not making a personal attack. I said I was sorry that you are still stuck in a cult of demons, worshipping space creatures and things.
And I expect people to resort to pithy personal attacks when they can't address the arguments themselves.
You don't have a position to oppose anyone, just cult teachings paper thin with nothing holding them up but worship of your cult leader.
Or if the person with the opposing position is immature.
Funny how the writers of the New Testament missed that, and never referred to it or quoted anything from it.
Isaiah 53 is the clearest and most concise explanation of the gospel in the OT.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Funny how the writers of the New Testament missed that, and never referred to it or quoted anything from it.
Isaiah 53 is the clearest and most concise explanation of the gospel in the OT.
Originally posted by windword
Do you have a copy of the B. W. Butterworth translation of Origen's "First Principles, where that quote is cited to have come from?
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by ganjoa
Anyone who does is having faith in a cult rather then what the Bible says.
Your postulate is absolutely correct: the entire concept just doesn't make any logical sense - but you'll just have to take tat on faith!
There is a theory and you can look it up in Wikipedia, which is called "penal substitutionary atonement theory".
....
Originally posted by Deirdre
This has always been one of my main problems with the religion and one reason I deconverted. Why is God needing more bloodshed to resolve, essentially, his screw-up in how he created the world? And if Jesus = God, then who cares? He killed himself in order to appease himself so he could forgive us? But it only works if we a. know about it at all; and b. believe in it? Whaa? It just doesn't make any sense.
Why do I need God to forgive my sins? My sins aren't hurting God, they're hurting other humans. God obviously isn't bothered by my sins if he can torture me for eternity later anyway. (Which BTW, is psychotic.)
The other thing is the Jesus worship. I'm supposed to have a personal relationship with a guy who's been dead for 2000 years and saved me from...what? The God that I am supposed to worship and love also? That is a pretty dysfunctional family, seriously. The devil isn't the one putting me in hell. God is. Good going, solving that problem, God! You sure punished that devil guy by um...making him the king of hell and just allowing him all kinds of freedom to make humans suffer, which he apparently enjoys immensely?
For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.1 Corin. 1:18 NKJV
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by adjensen
I guess that means the quotes from your Christian site where he supposedly argues against reincarnation were fabricated as well, right? Of course a Christian site like the one you linked to wouldn't post that quote, it would be against their argument.
Have you gone through all of Origen's works and have verified that they aren't part of them? If not, you are only assuming based on your bias. Prove they aren't contained in his actual works and you may have a point.
Looked it up... didn't find said article. Found however an article about Propitiation
Penal substitution (sometimes, esp. in older writings, called forensic theory) is a theory of the atonement within Christian theology, . . .
en.wikipedia.org...