It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why being Gay IS a Natural thing

page: 33
27
<< 30  31  32   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 17 2013 @ 10:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Spawn2001
 



Originally posted by Spawn2001
I don't like you people, the gays.

Like whoever you want to like
I know I do. This really isn't what the gay community is after though.


The religious rite and republicans don't like you either and they are gonna try there hardest to make sure you never get the right to marry.

ATS is a very good reminder of this



I said in my post that got removed marriage is a religious thing and do you want to be married in a church or a state building?

I want to be married on the beach somewhere tropical. A non-religious ceremony. Probably not what you were really asking tho!


You feel " oppressed" that you don't have all the same marriage legal benefits?

LGBT inequality extends to many other issues. Marriage is but one. I am thinking globally as well.


Society has been around awhile and has a structure and everything.

Indeed. The gays have coexisted with that society as well.


And most the world isn't gay

For thousands of years women had sex with men

It's estimated at 3-10% of the World's population. No logical reason to think this is going to change. Also women are having sex with men now, and they will continue to. You really shouldn't worry about that. In fact the World population is predicted to grow substantially within the next 100 years.


Then these overly flamboyant males that are butt buddies, show up a few decades ago.

Did they now? How do you figure?


Remember when A.I.D.S. started? How do you know that wasn't a gift from God for the homo sexual community?

Well. I for one don't believe a Creator god would be malevolent. Guess you do.


Some people believe you shouldn't blur the line between gender

Some people do. More people understand sexual orientation isn't a choice however.


Hopefully this post won't be removed.

This might strike you as odd but some of the things you say are not exactly in line with the whole manners and decorum thang.


And why don't we include these pervs in our country's laws and protect them, and treat them as equals. Invite them to thanksgiving dinner.

Simple. Is there a victim involved in your scenario? Two consenting homosexuals are not causing harm. According to many "religious rite and republicans" it's essentially causing the destruction of everything, but they don't have any valid reasons outside of unfounded religious beliefs and disliking them.
edit on 17-7-2013 by Lucid Lunacy because: (no reason given)




posted on Jul, 17 2013 @ 10:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Spawn2001
 


If you ask me, AIDS is caused by drugs and I don't buy what the so called mainstream views of it are for a multitude of reasons I don't feel like listing here. Male-on-male (and female-on-female) sexual activity has also been occurring for quite some time. It was considered to be quite normal in Rome, you know hundreds of years ago (much longer than just in recent decades on top of that!). Not all people who are participants in this thread are homosexual, so I don't know why you are saying "Oh I don't like you people" based on that assumption.

As far as saying "that's gay" or saying "you're gay", people use all kinds of terms to play around or to be derogatory (they also use terms like "ghetto" or "black" or "white", etc. in different cases out of context as well). Does that mean that they automatically discriminate against those people? No, it's just a term that is misused or used out of context. It doesn't mean they are actually insulting that lifestyle so to speak or those who live that particular lifestyle.

The definition of marriage has changed many times over the years including incest, age, bestiality, how many spouses you can have, etc., so what is so different about being able to marry someone of the same sex? Why should we deny a couple the right to legal benefits if they pay taxes, contribute to the community, have jobs, etc. just as people who live a heterosexual lifestyle do? No one is saying you have to LIKE homosexual people as that is your choice but limiting their rights because of how they want to live? That's real logical...................



posted on Jul, 17 2013 @ 10:46 PM
link   
reply to post by Spawn2001
 


With that post i have a double whammy, gay and a Drag queen,

but can i ask why you don't like people you haven't met?



posted on Jul, 17 2013 @ 10:50 PM
link   
reply to post by Darth_Prime
 


Wait, your post makes too much logical sense; you might scare them away!



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 02:55 AM
link   
reply to post by rainprincess64
 


On the topic of AIDS, if you haven't already, go check out this site.

It's all about the HIV/AIDS myth and other strange conspiracies thereof (i.e. HIV does not cause AIDS according to a host of virologists).

Basically, the same thing you said about drugs.
edit on 18-7-2013 by scolai because: I wanted to.



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 03:29 AM
link   

edit on 18-7-2013 by tigershark1988 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 18 2013 @ 12:56 PM
link   
reply to post by scolai
 


Thank you very much for that interesting link. I actually wrote a paper a few years ago about HIV and AIDS (and read multiple papers about virologists and such discussing the true nature of HIV and AIDS). My main point in that post of mine was to refute that person's claims AIDS and HIV is God's way of punishing mankind for homosexuality which is real logical.... *sarcasm*



posted on Jul, 19 2013 @ 06:25 PM
link   
If homosexual is NATURAL, then it would be
a natural reaction for a gay man to have a spontaneous erection
when preparing to have anal intercourse with anoother man correct?

Why is it then that homosexual males have to take viagra
and other erectile dysfunction drugs to produce an artifical
erection in the presence of their lover.

They take ED drugs about
873% higher rate than normal
natural men who get normal natural erections.





edit on 19-7-2013 by spirited75 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 19 2013 @ 07:46 PM
link   
reply to post by spirited75
 


Source please. As someone who works in a pharmacy I can tell you that the only Viagra and Cialis scripts I have seen come from elderly men.



posted on Jul, 19 2013 @ 08:09 PM
link   
reply to post by Djayed
 


One of the most uneducated posts I have had the displeasure of reading.

GAY is NOT natural (reproduction deficiency). However, it is NOT wrong. It is just DIFFERENT!! - that, is how simple it really is.



posted on Jul, 19 2013 @ 08:12 PM
link   
This shouldn't even be a discussion anymore. Why do people still have to marginalize people by their sexuality?
This will shortly become another embarrasment to us, just like how we were embarrased at to how we treated african americans.
They are people, regardless of sexuality, race, etc.
I can't believe there are still bigots with this idea that homosexuals are wrong and incorriguble.
Wouldn't you think with all the bullying and hate they get, they would "change back to being heterosexual"? Why would someone choose to be ridiculed purely for how they were born. The ignorance, man!



posted on Jul, 19 2013 @ 08:21 PM
link   
reply to post by JohnBlack
 


Do you have science or fact to backup your "educated" opinion or are you simply insulting someone else's opinion because it doesn't match your own?

reply to post by katyehh
 


Well said! I agree that it's not logical for someone to "choose" to be heterosexual for this reason. I also agree that this really shouldn't even be a discussion bc well it shouldn't even be a big deal. Who should care what the hell people do behind closed doors anyways?
edit on 7/19/13 by rainprincess64 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 19 2013 @ 10:24 PM
link   
reply to post by spirited75
 



If homosexual is NATURAL, then it would be
a natural reaction for a gay man to have a spontaneous erection
when preparing to have anal intercourse with anoother man correct?

I would say yes but only because if it has gone that far there was obviously attraction to begin with. However gay people aren't attracted to everyone of the same sex... just like you aren't of everyone of the opposite.


Why is it then that homosexual males have to take viagra
and other erectile dysfunction drugs to produce an artifical
erection in the presence of their lover.

Better question. How on Earth do you think you could actually know this? Are you omniscient??

No it's not true at all. Gay people, save for a medical issue or perhaps the effects of some substance like alcohol, don't have issues with arousal towards the same sex. It's kinda the point! They are attracted to same gender...

To point out again. Homosexuality includes women as well.
edit on 19-7-2013 by Lucid Lunacy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 19 2013 @ 10:26 PM
link   
reply to post by JohnBlack
 



GAY is NOT natural (reproduction deficiency).


Their reproductive systems don't stop working simply because they are gay. Lesbian couples use insemination and have children you know.



posted on Jul, 20 2013 @ 12:20 AM
link   
reply to post by katyehh
 


I concur!

assuming it's part of our Gay agenda, to force the children into accepting the deviant unnatural lifestyle we selected




posted on Jul, 21 2013 @ 06:30 PM
link   
reply to post by tamusan
 


Haha okay... I don't know if you actually read my post but no where did it say I have or did choose to be gay, or straight for that matter.

You basically reiterated what I said. You do not choose who you're sexually attracted to.



posted on Jul, 21 2013 @ 09:38 PM
link   
reply to post by spirited75
 

Wow, now I think I've heard it all.

I mean nothing can take my mirth away after reading that post.

I've never taken Viagra in my life,

No disrespect to anyone that needs it, but it's funny to say that gay sex in particular needs Viagra.

Not by my experience so far.

So gay sex started in 1998?
edit on 21-7-2013 by halfoldman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 22 2013 @ 05:08 AM
link   
I don't believe in any religion. But i observed that all the species on earth are bound in natural programming. For example, the formula of birth rate is actually one male & one female, especially in humans. The reasons of homosexuality are something else. nor in religion or in evolution.

edit on 22-7-2013 by modernwisdom because: had been wrote some unnecessary words.



posted on Jul, 22 2013 @ 02:31 PM
link   
Instead of reading the topic title as a statement, my response will treat it as a question:

1) "Why is being gay a natural thing?"

--I know it's taboo to answer a question with a question but " Why is being heterosexual a natural thing? " When that question is answered, then the mysteries of life will unravel (I'm sure). However, there's no sense in contemplating the true answer to that because we were not nor do we know the entity who decided to make polar sexualities.

2) To play devil's advocate, "Why is being gay NOT a natural thing?"
--In the same respect, "Why is being heterosexual NOT a natural thing?" can not possibly be answered due to the reason above as stated.

Thus, it is because it is. So far, my response has taken a neutral approach. Being sided with the approval of homosexuality, there is one question which I propose that is unanswerable as well:

"When did you choose to be heterosexual?"

As a homosexual, I do deeply admire the fact that we live in a society to where there can be a debate such as this. All in all, we are all one...we breathe the same air, walk on the same ground, and we all question the same enigmas of our origin(s). When we get to the point of focusing on our unity versus our differences then we will unlock amazing abilities within ourselves and our civilization(s).



posted on Jul, 22 2013 @ 07:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by spirited75
If homosexual is NATURAL, then it would be
a natural reaction for a gay man to have a spontaneous erection
when preparing to have anal intercourse with anoother man correct?


It is. Although... I'm sure the erection is far from "spontaneous" most of the time.


Why is it then that homosexual males have to take viagra
and other erectile dysfunction drugs to produce an artifical
erection in the presence of their lover.

They take ED drugs about
873% higher rate than normal
natural men who get normal natural erections.


Complete fallacy; most likely made up on the spot.

I have to wonder why you're on this site as if people here don't have high standards for evidence. You can't just make up numbers, throw them out there, and expect people to absorb them and recognize them as facts.
edit on 22-7-2013 by LightOrange because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
27
<< 30  31  32   >>

log in

join