NASA: The End Of Mankind "Leaked Document" 2013

page: 1
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 08:04 AM
link   
I came across this video today and dont quite know what to make of it..

It apparently discloses a Nasa Document "The End Of Mankind" by two individuals I havent heard of before - Deborah Tavares and Trevor Coppolo.

They cover everything from the Illuminati, nanobot weaponary that boars into the lung, mind control via different microwave weaponry. Yeah,... thats what I thought!

How legit is the document? The lady in the video stated it was available on the NASA website but I havent seen it anywhere.

I just wanted to post to see how many ATS'ers had come across this and what you guys thought of it.

edit on 28-6-2013 by pigsy2400 because: (no reason given)
edit on 28-6-2013 by pigsy2400 because: (no reason given)
edit on 28-6-2013 by pigsy2400 because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 08:07 AM
link   
They lady represents it in a way that weaves together alot of conspiracies together, but I wonder if there is any grain of truth in it?

I always believe that when things like this arise, there is 95% misinformation with the remaining 5% closer to the truth,. just found it interesting.


I know ATS is full of very intelligent people who will be able to take this apart and make some sense of it.



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 08:09 AM
link   
Why does this video get re-posted every day? It's been debunked as a hoax.



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 08:10 AM
link   
reply to post by DestroyDestroyDestroy
 


in that case, accept my apologies, I did use the seach function before I posted and it didnt come up with anything.



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 08:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by pigsy2400
reply to post by DestroyDestroyDestroy
 


in that case, accept my apologies, I did use the seach function before I posted and it didnt come up with anything.


This is the link to the PDF,

www.stopthecrime.net...

There is a name at the top of the PDF, if it can be verified.
edit on 28-6-2013 by smurfy because: Text.



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 08:17 AM
link   
reply to post by smurfy
 


thanks smurfy,. I will have a look through it.

Can we confirm where this document originated,.. was it nasa or was it someone with too much time on their hands?



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 08:19 AM
link   
Youtube


People will be open to believe anything if they watch it on Youtube. Regardless of how legitimate a video from youtube looks, I wouldn't think too much of it.

Think for yourselves, do not allow your mind to become prone to disinformation. Do your own research, and don't let everything you know be from a source like Youtube.

That's what is pathetic about ATS these days, too many people post Youtube videos as their source as a way to make thier point, well news flash - you're not the only one on the planet with original opinions, so there is bound to be a Youtube video of whatever information you want to dicuss whether it's true or not.



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 08:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by TheProphetMark
Youtube


People will be open to believe anything if they watch it on Youtube. Regardless of how legitimate a video from youtube looks, I wouldn't think too much of it.

Think for yourselves, do not allow your mind to become prone to disinformation. Do your own research, and don't let everything you know be from a source like Youtube.

That's what is pathetic about ATS these days, too many people post Youtube videos as their source as a way to make thier point, well news flash - you're not the only one on the planet with original opinions, so there is bound to be a Youtube video of whatever information you want to dicuss whether it's true or not.


excuse me!!!

I found the video rather entertaining as I referred to in my original OP,. I just wanted other peoples opinions on it,... I aint no damn sheeple sir!!



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 08:26 AM
link   
reply to post by pigsy2400
 


Where did I call you a sheelpe?

Don't take it too personally because I wasn't referring to you in the general sense.

Notice I said 'yourselves', I was actually speaking to the majority while talking about my opinion on Youtube in general, Sir.
edit on 28-6-2013 by TheProphetMark because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 08:30 AM
link   
reply to post by pigsy2400
 


The author is given as Dennis Bushnell,
This a decent interview with him from 2007. You may see some kind of connections to the PDF or you may not.


www.science20.com...



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 08:40 AM
link   
reply to post by pigsy2400
 


nnnnnnnoh my god. nasa let their top secrets go on youtube! how did you manage to crack into this secret information



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 08:41 AM
link   
Its an interesting video, and she does tie a lot of real issues together, but for some reason my BS detector goes off when watching it, also, the PDF document looks like a plain ol' slide put together by someone sitting in there living room. I could definitely see the powers that be putting something like this together, but I don't think that this one is it.



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 08:49 AM
link   
About that PDF.....

There was a report written by Dennis M. Bushnell in 2001.


The Army Training and Doctrine Command conducts an exercise examining technology from the “Red Team” perspective. Dr. Dennis Bushnell, a NASA scientist, has taken the lead on this project. After reviewing the game over several years, Dr. Bushnell produced a 2001 briefing, Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare, Circa 2025, in which he identified several technologies that could lead to new WMD. He examined information technology, biotechnology, advanced energy sources, and nanotechnology.
Source - CAUTION!!! .mil url

Basically he was asked, over 10 years ago, to examine war game exercises and predict where technology might be in 2025.

His report is not about current tech, it was about future tech (projecting 2025) written in 2001.



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 09:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by smurfy

Originally posted by pigsy2400
reply to post by DestroyDestroyDestroy
 


in that case, accept my apologies, I did use the seach function before I posted and it didnt come up with anything.


This is the link to the PDF,

www.stopthecrime.net...

There is a name at the top of the PDF, if it can be verified.
edit on 28-6-2013 by smurfy because: Text.

I did a google search, he is a real NASA scientist.

He seems to do a lot of thinking about the future and global warming.



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 11:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by butcherguy

I did a google search, he is a real NASA scientist.

He seems to do a lot of thinking about the future and global warming.


Yes I know he is a real person, what I meant was if he really was the author of the PDF.



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 11:49 AM
link   
reply to post by pigsy2400
 


Here's another link to a mystery document. It seems to tie in with the PDF,

www.stopthecrime.net...



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 11:50 AM
link   
I think this is the 4th or 5th time this video and PDF have shown up here in just the past 3 days... been a hoax everytime



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 12:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by smurfy

Originally posted by butcherguy

I did a google search, he is a real NASA scientist.

He seems to do a lot of thinking about the future and global warming.


Yes I know he is a real person, what I meant was if he really was the author of the PDF.


I did some research and can not confirm he is the author of the PDF in the video. I also can not say if the PDF is even based on his report because I can not find a full copy on the internet.

What I can say is; there is a document I found that lists the slides from a PDF presentation cited to Bushnell. Some of the slides seems to be the same, some are entirely different.)

CAUTION, .mil url - Slides cited for Bushnell's report here. It is all from 2001. And it is all based on technology that could be available in 2025 based on 2001's current tech.

In short. The report Bushnell created is 12 years old. All sources seems to indicate the PDF in the video is a hoax because:

1. It was written 12 years ago & was not based on current usable tech. (As the video would have you believe)
2. With only the cited slides from the actual report to go by (again 12 years old), there is no way to attribute the presentation to Bushnell.

(and as a side note, this is the same lady that declared a planet the size of Jupiter was next to our Sun, and is headed straight for us.
edit on 28-6-2013 by OneisOne because: drop punch



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 03:32 PM
link   
reply to post by OneisOne
 

Well,
There is one thing that is curious. There is the mention of Blacklight Power with a question mark beside it on one of the menus. Blacklight Power still exists, in fact this year they say they have their alternative power source ready to rock n' roll. The company, or at least the company's proposed power source has been highly ridiculed by scholars all through its existence, NASA even paid researcher/s to look into it even when. So this is the thing, why would a hoaxer even include this idea into the text, whereas NASA might have been saying, "weeell there might be something in it" at the time.

en.wikipedia.org...

Sorry for the direct reply, I am obliged to quote so very little.



posted on Jun, 28 2013 @ 04:03 PM
link   
reply to post by smurfy
 

Why would a hoaxer include it? Well probably to sell the idea of the government suppressing tech for nefarious purposes.

If you look into Bushnell you will see that he supports Andrea Rossi's E-Cat technology and took some flack for it. So could it have been included in his original presentation? Maybe. But I don't think we have truly seen the slides from it.

If some one could produce the actual report, rather than a "presentation", it would go a long way to confirming if this is a hoax. The closest I've come is finding a copy is of the text for the presentation. (which again does not match the PDF linked in this thread)



new topics
 
4
<<   2 >>

log in

join