It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by madmac5150
When was the last time that a man and potential future father was able to legally block a woman from aborting their unborn child? The woman has the option as a matter of "choice" to end the pregnancy. The father has no rights to save the unborn child's life, even though it "takes two to tango"... and he is the parent as well...
Originally posted by Komodo
I'll guess I'll continue to bring a point home, my wife fully understands of her husband having the last word in our home,
............. she KNOWS there's only 1 authority in the household and her husband has the last word period.
From the dawn of time, MEN here always and forever shall be made to have the last decision in households and governments.
this is completely backwards to the order that was put in place for us
oh yes.. and where does Communisum fit in, in a nutshell, is to twist and upset the balance of power
Originally posted by racasan
there seems to be an unconsidered economic consequence to feminism and the alleged attack on men
en.wikipedia.org...
and this grass eater/Herbivore men thing is seen as a big problem in Japan
put simply when men become disillusioned with women they go “Galt” and no longer produce as much for society as they have in the past when supporting a family
this Youtube channel explains the situation well
www.youtube.com...
you can also drop “men going their own way” and “where have all the men gone” into google for more on this situationedit on 27-6-2013 by racasan because: edit to add
Originally posted by racasan
reply to post by SearchLightsInc
Society works because those that produce make more than they need and that extra supports those that don’t produce – right?
If a lot of men decide the game is so stacked against them that they no longer want play then they won’t have any reason to produce anything extra, the will just make what they need and nothing more* – right?
If the “men going their own way” “grass eater men” movement takes off and a large percentage of men no longer bother with women then western population and economy will decline and the more traditional populations will take over – islam for example – right?
*Men don’t consume nearly as much as women do – I read somewhere women consume about 80% of goods and services
Originally posted by racasan
reply to post by SearchLightsInc
Sorry I didn’t mean to imply a sex bias about who produces, but men do make up about half of the population so I think it’s fair to say they do produce some things and if men or anybody has no need to work harder than they need then why would they?
There are 3 ways to deal with women
1 - just be a pick up artist and have to long term commitment to one
2 - ignore them
3 – stick with the traditional father/husband roll
If option 3 is seen as no longer an option then what do you think will happen?
Drop “women control 80% of consumer spending” in google there are a lot of articles on this
Originally posted by racasan
reply to post by SearchLightsInc
There are always consequences when things change – right?
Do you think there are going to be consequences for:
no fault divorce?
men losing access to their children and the court system being stacked against them?
men losing a big chunk of their stuff after a divorce? (particularly annoying if the divorce wasn’t his fault)
there also seems to be a problem with male education? (or the female learning style being more favoured in schools)
just to be clear – I have just recently become aware of the mgtow thing, but the implications of it seem huge – I don’t know how many men would have to go down this path before the already declining child birth rates in the west are even more effected
Originally posted by racasan
Drop “women control 80% of consumer spending” in google there are a lot of articles on this
Women’s consumption reflects that they generally earn less than men and have less
money at their disposal. They are more likely to buy the cheaper basic
essentials such as food, clothing and household articles.
Men both earn and spend more than women and their purchases tend towards more expensive
capital goods such as homes, cars and electronics.
While it is estimated that women make over 80% of consumer purchasing decisions, men spend over
80% of household income, although this is changing as women gain more
economic and marketplace power
What is termed “women’s consumption” of household goods and
services is more often representative of family consumption as a whole.
Women are responsible for activities such as shopping, food preparation,
gift-buying, and disposal of used items. Women spend more than men on
consumer goods, including in the categories of hygiene, medical care and
health, clothing and shoes, books and culture. Men are more likely to eat out
than women, consume more alcohol and tobacco, and spend more on
transport and sport. A study in the United Kingdom shows that in families,
women are responsible for purchasing almost all household goods, while
men make more consumption decisions with regard to automobiles and
holidays
In terms of resource impacts, women tend to leave a smaller ecological
footprint than men due to their more sustainable consumption patterns.
Sustainable consumption is using resources in a way that minimises harm to
the environment while supporting the well-being of people. Men’s lifestyles
and consumer patterns, whether they are rich or poor, tend to be more
resource-intensive and less sustainable than women’s (Johnsson-Latham,
2006). Impressing a more feminine footprint would result in a smaller
impact on the environment as well as better access to goods and services
that take into account the needs of both women and men.
In recent decades, a large share of economic growth in the OECD area
has come from employing more women. Since 1995, narrowing the gap
between male and female employment rates has accounted for half of the
increase in Europe’s overall employment rate and a quarter of annual
economic growth.
It is estimated that if female employment were raised to
the male rate, growth in gross domestic product (GDP) would be substantial,
particularly in countries such as Japan (CSR, 2007). Similarly, a study in the
United Kingdom found that the country could gain 2% of GDP by better
harnessing women’s skills (WWC, 2006).
The employment gender gap is most pronounced in countries such as Turkey,
Mexico, Italy and Greece, where less than 50% of women work. Female
employment rates are highest at over 70% in Iceland, Denmark, Norway,
Sweden and Switzerland.
Originally posted by smyleegrl
Men tend to be physically stronger, while women tend to be more nurturing.