It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shimri
Originally posted by amazing
Good for equal rights! Old Testament, Abrahamic laws and thinking have no place in today's world!
Really?
Do not murder. Do not steal. Don't sleep with your neighbor's husband/wife. Don't murder. Respect your parents. Respect your elders. Do not charge interest to your fellow citizen. Give to the poor and needy. Support orphans. Support widows. Take care of the Earth and it's inhabitants. Drink wine and eat BBQ. Take a day off every seven days. Take a year off every seven years. All debts are cancelled every seven years. Don't have intercourse with your family members. Don't have intercourse with animals.
No place in today's world!edit on 26-6-2013 by Shimri because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by camaro68ss
correction, i guess it only Allows gays to have the same benefits in states that allow gay marrige. but still makes gay marrige a state issue?
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Havent finished reading the ruling yet but it sounds like all its doing is extending federal "benefits" like joint filing and federal employee spousal benefits to couples married in states that have acknowledged gay marriage but does nothing to affect states which do not acknowledge gay marriage.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
So now I have to ask what happens when a same-sex couple marries in a state that recognizes their marriage moves to a state that does not.
Their marriage is not valid in that state? The fed wont have to recognize it either?
Originally posted by resoe26
so this is the only defining moment in Obama's career.
This is what he will be remembered with, 'Obama was president when homosexuals were finally allowed to marry'
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
So now I have to ask what happens when a same-sex couple marries in a state that recognizes their marriage moves to a state that does not.
Their marriage isnt valid in that state? The fed wont have to recognize it either?
Originally posted by Phoenix
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Havent finished reading the ruling yet but it sounds like all its doing is extending federal "benefits" like joint filing and federal employee spousal benefits to couples married in states that have acknowledged gay marriage but does nothing to affect states which do not acknowledge gay marriage.
Seems the ruling then would allow people to claim unequal treatment by various states under other constitutional clauses.
To me the issue has always been an oddity when reading the constitution because.....well... when I read "equal" it literally means equal.
The government has no business legislating peoples private lives period.
Under cake and eat it theory it should now be possible for firearm owners to make "equal" treatment cases on this precedent anywhere discrimination occurs on federal level or lets say federal discrimination regarding the holding of a heath insurance policy etc. etc.
To those opposed to this I'd say start looking where you actually suffer unequal treatment under the law and go from there - good ruling constitutionally that has silver lining if you get off the single subject and use precedent.
The real point to me is the theory that we should ALL be left alone to our beliefs - genius of the way constitution was written but not followed for political reasons couched in morality.
Originally posted by BubbaJoe
If a hetero couple move to a different state, their marriage is still valid. This ruling only applies to federal benefits.
Legal experts say repeal could cause confusion among couples who live in one of 38 states where same-sex marriage is not legal. Some benefits like tax breaks for married couples and Social Security survivorship might not be available, depending on the state.
Federal agencies use a number of different criteria to determine if a couple is eligible for benefits. For example, most federal agencies use one or a combination of the following rules to determine whether a couple is "married": the state where a couple married, where they reside or where they work.