It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
While I do not know the enviromental impact that chalk would have on the environment, however, the question is was there a study done on such? Can we be certain that it is biodegradeble?
Originally posted by Gazrok
You'd have to look at the definition of "vandalism" in the city or state laws. I'd wager this would NOT fit the definition, therefore he'd walk. Even if he didn't, he should only be liable for the amount of the cleanup. The law exists to make one "whole", and that would do it.
I lived in San Diego for about two years and the only misuse of power I've seen there was when the police confiscated all of the homeless people's belongings when they went into the soup kitchen to get a hot meal. The police were claiming the stuff abandoned after they literally witnessed the folks walk into the buildings. They had their pickup trucks right there waiting.... said it was blocking the sidewalks public use and they were cleaning it up. The police said they should have left space for other's to pass if they were parking belongings on the walk (cited bikes and bike racks as an example) They stood behind the fact that it was the city's sidewalk and they had jurisdiction to remove it as a nuisance.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I fear that may really depend. When the main thrust/season for Occupy was winding down into early 2012, they passed a series of laws to prevent it from happening again (in my view). Among them was an anti-vandalism law to cover federal lands. It included things like protection of diplomats, the President and the rest for Occupy and their type never getting close so as usually, it was a confused mess of issues in one bill. However, I distinctly recall provisions making it a major crime to deface or destroy federally controlled or protected property. There wasn't distinction made for the dollar amount or the nature of the 'defacing' and it was put forward then that simply planting picket signs could, technically, be defacing and destroying a court house lawn.
Stupid and crazy..I know..but so are many laws. It's all in how they are enforced. Banks would fall under it the same way they do for enforcement of crime. Banks are a federal crime to rob, even if it's a 100% locally based and controlled one. Why? FDIC Insurance and other regulation. Which...if I'm not mistaken, could be taken to mean the Bank's sidewalk as well.
The Devil is in the details, isn't it?edit on 26-6-2013 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
He says he went 2-3 times a week. So 2.5.
He did this for 6 months, 4.3 weeks a month.
So, 2.5*4.3*6=64.5 visits
6,000/64.5 is $93 per cleaning
Sounds reasonable to me.
When you enter a courtroom displaying a gold or yellow fringed flag, you have just entered into a foreign country, and you better have your passport with you, because you may not be coming back to the land of the free for a long time. The judge sitting under a gold or yellow fringe flag becomes the "captain" or "master" of that ship or enclave and he has absolute power to make the rules as he goes. The gold or yellow fringe flag is your warning that you are leaving your Constitutionally secured RIGHTS on the floor outside the door to that courtroom.
The Law of the Flag, an International Law, which is recognized by every nation of the planet, is defined as: "... a rule to the effect that a vessel is a part of the territory of the nation whose flag she flies. The term is used to designate the RIGHTS under which a ship owner, who sends his vessel into a foreign port, gives notice by his flag to all who enter into contracts with the ship master that he intends the Law of that Flag to regulate those contracts, and that they must either submit to its operation or not contract with him or his agent at all." Ref.: Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41
This is exactly why so many judges are appointed, and not elected by the people. The Federal judges are appointed by the President, the national military commander in chief. The State judges are appointed by the Governors, the state military commanders. The judges are appointed because the courts are military courts and civilians do not "elect" military officers. Under martial law, you are presumed guilty until proven innocent.
Originally posted by sdcigarpig
reply to post by Bob Sholtz
In the state of California, any substance that could contaminate water, the person putting said substance where it can enter into the storm drain, is guilty of pollution. That is the law out in California. I used to work in an industry where the environmental laws had to be watched and followed.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
$93 is what you pay to get a cleaning crew to show up. If it required real effort to clean from permanent markers it would have cost substantially more.
What the banks did has no bearing on this man breaking the law. You can open your eyes to the truth, but you are blinded by hatred so I don't expect that. Just because your neighbor is a felon doesn't make it alright to vandalise his property, with chalk or anything else.
Originally posted by alfa1
Does "freedom of speech" normally extend to acts of vandalism?
I mean if, for example, somebody you didnt like (eg. stupid neighbor) was to vandalise your own house in a similar way, then would you also be arguing that he has a right to do this because of "free speech"?
Because the law is supposed to work the same way, whether you agree with the person's ideals or not.
Originally posted by StrangeTimez
Jeff Olson, the 40-year-old man who is being prosecuted for scrawling anti-megabank messages on sidewalks in water-soluble chalk last year now faces a 13-year jail sentence. A judge has barred his attorney from mentioning freedom of speech during trial. According to the San Diego Reader, which reported on Tuesday that a judge had opted to prevent Olson’s attorney from "mentioning the First Amendment, free speech, free expression, public forum, expressive conduct, or political speech during the trial,” Olson must now stand trial for on 13 counts of vandalism.
rt.com...
THIS is madness. The kind of stuff that makes you scared to voice your opinions... We are going to hell in a handbasket.
One bank said they spent $6000 cleaning up the water soluable chalk lol....edit on 26-6-2013 by StrangeTimez because: Addition
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
His freedom of speech was not banned. Vandalism is not an act of freedom of speech.