It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A.B. 351 would prohibit California authorities from complying with sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA. Both of these statutes violate the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eight, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.
“A.B. 351 will preserve Californian’s rights from a government that has grown far beyond its morally or Constitutionally justifiable authority,” Assemblyman Donnelly said, “We cannot allow the federal government to unilaterally strip us of our rights.”
Originally posted by sparrowstail
Cool post. Good on them. Question: If every state did so would it not render the Federal gov't irrelevant in these matters?
Will we see States further distancing themselves from questionable infringements through State legislation?edit on 25-6-2013 by sparrowstail because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by neo96
Really would not hold California up as the beacon of 'liberty'
Considering their other totalitarian laws.
Yep California hypocrisy.
California Liberty Preservation act!!!!
edit on 25-6-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by eLPresidente
Pretty hard to 'chill out' considering Calrfornia;'s iron grip around the second amendment,
IF they were consistent I'd have no problems.
Your argument makes no sense, nobody is claiming California is the "beacon of liberty".
Why are you confusing yourself?
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by eLPresidente
Your argument makes no sense, nobody is claiming California is the "beacon of liberty".
Sure it does------>California liberty preservation act think it would actually protect liberty not just for one issue but others.
Or do they need multiplr liberty preservation acts?
Why are you confusing yourself?
Think California is the ones who are confused.edit on 25-6-2013 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by Reaper2137
The NDAA is Federal, not state.