posted on Jun, 29 2013 @ 09:36 PM
reply to post by butcherguy
You said the same thing as I speculating about Trayvon and his mother yet you re-state it as if there's a difference? Are you confused about
And as far as me "not wanting to answer some question", I barely understand what you're asking and in what context and the relevance. Here's my
attempt to answer your senseless question: As a human, operating on the fight or flight response, the specific situation would be assessed and based
upon my instinctual reaction, I would fight or fly. Don't really know what point you thought you were getting at.
reply to post by WeRpeons
What makes you think Trayvon could have simply walked into the nearest residence for help when the self appointed neighborhood savior deemed him one
of those suspicious "a-holes that always get away" and that he looked like he wasn't supposed to be there and was not wanted there.
The physical injuries of George Zimmerman in no way indicate a fight for your life. Very minor injuries. John Good testified that he never saw
Zimmerman being slammed on the concrete nor his head being repeatedly bashed into the concrete as claimed. The very slight scrapes/cuts on the back of
his head are not the type that show any type of life endangering force such as repeated slamming that could risk brain injury, but rather the moving
and twisting to attempt to wriggle out from the bottom position. You obviously have not a clue as to blunt force injuries or human skin. As testified
by John Good, there was a short tussle followed by some wrestling where it appeared Trayvon had the dominant position over George, yet based upon the
fact that there were no clear blows being delivered, George was still fighting as was Trayvon. It took the much bigger George Zimmerman approximately
8-15 seconds based upon Goods testimony to decide to pull out his gun and shoot Trayvon.
And how does me calling George fat have anything to do with my opinion that he's guilty? John Goodmans fat and I doubt if you substituted him for
George in this situation this would have happened. I've decided his guilt based upon the facts. Not trying to be insulting but you are having a hard
So in your beliefs you can engage in confrontation with a minor, take part in a fight with said minor, start losing the fight then shoot and kill him
with no repercussions? Does that really sound remotely reasonable to you?