It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Should California tell farmers throughout the country how to run their farms? Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, says no.
"It's exactly what our founding fathers wanted to avoid," King said.
But the rural-state lawmaker is concerned over California's strict laws on egg producers and other farmers as a result of Proposition 2, a ballot initiative passed by voters in 2008. The law requires egg producers to increase their cage size to more than 200 square inches, more than triple the industry recommendation. As a result, farmers from other states must comply with California hen cage standards if they wish to sell their product in the Golden State.
If they don't comply, they can't do business there.
But not if King has his way. He's proposed an amendment to the pending farm bill in Congress which would allow farmers in other states to sell eggs in California without having to comply with the state's law.
"There's no reason for anybody to produce an egg in this state when it can be produced in another state for half the cost," said Eddie Voortman, a third-generation egg rancher in Ontario, Calif.
At Voortman's Egg Ranch, they're gearing up to change their chicken cages to comply with California law, which takes effect in 2015. That will take money. And it will leave them with fewer hens.
"We're gonna have to open up the cages quite a bit, give them a lot more room to spread around," Voortman said, overlooking his farm's 50,000 hens. "That's kinda where we're at a disadvantage right now. Other states aren't gonna have to comply with that."
www.foxnews.com...
"It was a mistake for California to do what it did," King said. "I'm sorry that that's the case. But we can't impose that mistake on the rest of America."
While the Humane Society is typically no friend of farmers, now they are working hand in hand with the egg lobby to pass a different bill, one which would standardize the size of hen cages nationwide. It's a concession for egg producers who believe a national standard could pre-empt one state from telling another how to raise its farm animals.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
I see nothing wrong with this. Its no different than firearm laws. Think about it. If firearm manufacturers want to sell in Cali, they have to offer models that fit the state's capacity restrictions. Some manu's choose to do it. Others dont.
I simply dont buy it. I have raised chickens. The overhead is ridiculously low. The only reason chickens are kept so tightly packed in is so the farmers can squeeze every penny out of them.
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
I see nothing wrong with this. Its no different than firearm laws. Think about it. If firearm manufacturers want to sell in Cali, they have to offer models that fit the state's capacity restrictions. Some manu's choose to do it. Others dont.
Well if out of state manufacturers had to produce pink and purple polka dotted eggs for sale in California ( simply a different type of egg) , I'd agree with you, but that's not the case. Gun manufacturers will not have to change the entire way they do business if they want to do business with California, - like the egg farmers will (they will simply produce a new product ) - and this could put all egg farmers in California out of business. That threat is not happening to the gun makers.
Originally posted by charles1952
Just out of curiosity, can someone tell me how this bill will aid the consumers of California? I can see how it hurts the egg producers of the other states, but is there some reason to tax California citizens for chicken comfort?