It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by darkbake
Originally posted by opethPA
What about the 3 kind of poster, "Snowden, Ignore the laws he broke! He is a hero!"
Snowden knows he broke the law. He also knows that the law of the land in the U.S. is illegitimate, so it hardly matters. That's why other countries are not cooperating with the U.S. when it comes to Snowden's extradition.edit on 24-6-2013 by darkbake because: (no reason given)
The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 is a United States federal law that protects federal whistleblowers who work for the government and report agency misconduct. A federal agency violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if agency authorities take (or threaten to take) retaliatory personnel action against any employee or applicant because of disclosure of information by that employee or applicant
This could ripple throughout the West. As for why Hong Kong and Ecuador and Russia are helping him out?
Originally posted by introV
Sir Snowden needs to write a code. A reverse trigger code. If he doesn't enter a password every hour into it, it will upload everything he has to expose.
Ya know... in case he gets taken out...
Originally posted by SPECULUM
The crappy part of all this is the government will create another 911 scenario so the stupid citizens will change focus and end the curiosity into the governments snooping.
Its all textbook, right out of Gerbils propaganda doctrine
once again the bastards get away with everything
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
The only true whistle-blower is Snowden here. Assange and Manning blew the whistle on nothing in my opinion save underlying diplomatic dealings that have been happening since the dawn of diplomacy.
The hypocrisy is best illustrated in the case of four whistleblowers from the National Security Agency: Thomas Drake, William Binney, J. Kirk Wiebe and Edwrd Loomis. Falsely accused of leaking in 2007, they have endured years of legal harassment for exposing the waste and fraud behind a multibillion-dollar contract for a system called Trailblazer, which was supposed to “revolutionize” the way the NSA produced signals intelligence (SIGINT) in the digital age. Instead, it was canceled in 2006 and remains one of the worst failures in US intelligence history. But the money spent on this privatization scheme, like so much at the NSA, remains a state secret.
Kiriakou is three months into a 30-month sentence having pleaded guilty to disclosing the identity of an undercover CIA officer to an ABC reporter. He is one of six current or former public officials to be prosecuted by the Obama administration under the Espionage Act – twice the number of cases instigated by all previous presidents combined.
Kiriakou's letter underlines in graphic form the personal consequences of the Obama administration's aggressive assault on leakers. It comes as the attorney general, Eric Holder, is under mounting pressure following revelations that the Department of Justice secretly investigated the activities of reporters working for Associated Press and Fox News in unrelated leak investigations.
Unlike Edward Snowden or Bradley Manning, Brown is not a celebrity. But after helping expose a dirty tricks plot, he faces jail.
Brown made a splash in February 2011 by helping to uncover "Team Themis", a project by intelligence contractors retained by Bank of America to demolish the hacker society known as Anonymous and silence sympathetic journalists like Glenn Greenwald (now with the Guardian, though then with Salon). The campaign reportedly involved a menagerie of contractors: Booz Allen Hamilton, a billion-dollar intelligence industry player and Snowden's former employer; Palantir, a PayPal-inspired and -funded outfit that sells "data-mining and analysis software that maps out human social networks for counterintelligence purposes"; and HBGary Federal, an aspirant consultancy in the intelligence sector.
Originally posted by alienreality
Seeing a few people repeating that he broke the law, including the same thing in the news over and over, and by many on both sides of congress and senate, it appears as definite psyop material because of the frequency and constant emphasis of this same phrase, again and, again.
Originally posted by Miracula
Snowden is working for terrorists. Not literally or directly, but he's favoring them with his disclosure.
What's more important, privacy (and the average Americans privacy is not violated with these monitoring systems) or preventing terror by monitoring those people with affiliations the average American doesn't have?
He violated the chain of command. He should have taken his concerns up the chain of command IN HOUSE, which is what he is required to do by law.
Originally posted by Miracula
He violated the chain of command. He should have taken his concerns up the chain of command IN HOUSE, which is what he is required to do by law.