It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Since you say yourself that 'Jesus told us to be good slaves' then why was the Bible written, if not to tell us to be good slaves? How did that come about that they were already enslaved? Please tell me this. Do you consider it coincidence that (I presume, correct me if I am wrong) you were raised in the culture that believes in the Bible. Is it coincidence that the vast majority of people in our culture do not believe in the Mahabarata or the Baghavad Gita? And vice versa, the vast majority of people in India do not believe in the Bible? IMO, this is clear statistical evidence that there is a psychological mechanism to make us believe in a religion during the time when we are highly suggestable (such as childhood, or while under stress).
Originally posted by Paschar0
The main argument is that God "inspired" the authors to write it
Maybe we should start a thread on how our alien overlords are using this to look for humans that are obedient enough to believe in religion in order to be further processed!
Originally posted by AQuestion
As for me, I became an agnostic at 12. I left the Catholic church because I was not convinced, not because they were evil, they were not, I was not convinced of some of their dogma. I spent over a decade researching all the religions. I studied Indian religions and was not convinced by them. The question is not which religion is right, the bigger question is if there is a God or not. Start with that one.
Is there eternity, is there a greater sentience, do we continue once this play has ended? Peace.
Kudos for you, AQ. I respect people who spent an effort on something as fundamental as this. Do you really contemplate eternity? For me, this seems impossible, just like the origin of the universe. Whether Big Bang or God, so far nobody has been able to tell me what came before them or caused them. I rather limit my "thought experiment" to the 'greater sentience'. For me God is the spirit within us. We may disagree but I respect your belief and thank you for courtesy and your contribution.
Originally posted by ThinkingHuman
Originally posted by borntowatch
Distortion, ignorance, or inability to read? Which one is it?
I said "There is nothing wrong with the message to love one another".
I quoted what John said - maybe you WISH it would say something else.
It seems that you know nothing of Christianity - at least you don't show any.
Next time read my post, and the Bible.
Jesus answered: "Don't you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, 'Show us the Father'?
I have read the bible, you pick and choose verse to justify your position
You proved my point, again. They saw Jesus, not God, despite what Jesus SAID, that does not make it so.
Don't you choose the quotes to support your position?
Originally posted by Paschar0
reply to post by AQuestion
Interesting, but if time is linear and a physical perception, God or anything outside that physical realm aren't subject to it's rules are they? What a thousand years feels like to us, likely doesn't exist outside earth, much less other dimensions.
Is it possible our spiritual energy is indestructible and is the reason why it's lifespan is referred to as infinite in all religions? Perhaps once we shed our temporary physical bodies, all the knowledge and memories of the ages flows back to us and maybe it's not growth we're really after, but simply experience.
I've never thought of myself AS God, but I hope very much we're a PART of God in that my energy, your energy all somehow matter and come together again in some way. This life and all other experiences are small parts of the universe "breathing" in and out, cycling through countless big bangs, all to allow us various paths of experience. Seems somewhat narrow minded to believe this one tiny little short life is all there is to be "judged" by for eternity doesn't it?
Religion, which the bible is firmly a part of, and all scripture, was written by man and hopefully at the least influenced by God. It was then interpreted at least somewhat correctly from each man it originated from, and again translated, hopefully correctly, after that. None of us really knows to what extent these interpretations may differ from it's author's true meaning, or if they were even legitimate, it's all just blind faith in the end. Culture, knowledge, fear, tradition, love, and of course physcology along with all the other things that make us human determine how strong this belief is in each of us and for some, there's a spiritual connection that helps us validate things further. In the end I suspect the "truth" is somewhere in the midst of it all and man's feeble attempts to interpret it are like everything else we've created...imperfect and gloriously human.
reply to post by ThinkingHuman
Text The organization became so successful that it became a worldwide religion. After the old man had died the son took his place and called himself the "Pope". The most powerful of the shepards often
Religion, which the bible is firmly a part of, and all scripture, was written by man and hopefully at the least influenced by God. It was then interpreted at least somewhat correctly from each man it originated from, and again translated, hopefully correctly, after that. None of us really knows to what extent these interpretations may differ from it's author's true meaning, or if they were even legitimate, it's all just blind faith in the end. Culture, knowledge, fear, tradition, love, and of course physcology along with all the other things that make us human determine how strong this belief is in each of us and for some, there's a spiritual connection that helps us validate things further. In the end I suspect the "truth" is somewhere in the midst of it all and man's feeble attempts to interpret it are like everything else we've created...imperfect and gloriously human.
AQ, (sorry for the delayed response, I had to take care of some things), I would agree that 'recognition that sentience is all that we can know'. Just to be clear on the meaning of the word, sentience is the ability to feel or perceive. Anything alive must have sentience in order to be able to ingest food, process it internally, reproduce, etc. Even inert objects may require sentience in order to self-assemble. Should Descartes not have said "I perceive, therefore I am"?
Originally posted by AQuestion
recognition that sentience is all that we can know. Descartes understood this to a degree. He said, "I think therefore I am"
Eternity is real because time exists. (It) is the deepest question that we all have to face.
Originally posted by borntowatch
Jesus is the visible form of God the Father
It seems silly to me to claim, that proving a document is fraudulent should be done without testing the document.
Now if you dont believe that fine but it seems silly to use scripture that you dont accept to support your argument.
Originally posted by Paschar0
Is it possible our spiritual energy is indestructible and is the reason why it's lifespan is referred to as infinite in all religions? I've never thought of myself AS God, but I hope very much we're a PART of God in that my energy, your energy all somehow matter and come together again in some way.
Paschar, I believe in spiritual energy because I sense it (as in 'sentience'). And many people nowayds also sense it. I believe that the Bible is a good book in that it encourages us to do things that are good, for the most part. But how can it possibly tell me about God? Nobody has seen God, all the accounts of God are biased, and humans are certainly too flawed to be the product of an Almighty.
Religion, which the bible is firmly a part of, and all scripture, was written by man and hopefully at the least influenced by God. It was then interpreted at least somewhat correctly
I would agree that 'recognition that sentience is all that we can know'. Just to be clear on the meaning of the word, sentience is the ability to feel or perceive. Anything alive must have sentience in order to be able to ingest food, process it internally, reproduce, etc. Even inert objects may require sentience in order to self-assemble. Should Descartes not have said "I perceive, therefore I am"? I'd like to make an observation: Some processes feed on themselves, they are, in a way, self-replicating, once they were started. Examples, fire, nuclear fusion and fission. Maybe what we perceive as time and space fall into that category also?
I disagree with these statements. There is no causal relationship between 'Eternity is real' and 'time exists'. Secondly, I don't believe that it is relevant. The universe will exist much longer than us. Faith in God provides comfort but faith that the universe will exist eternally, IMO, does not provide comfort. But since you believe this you must have an answer to "Who or what created God?" I like to ask people who believe in the Bible if they believe that it states the truth literally or that it uses methaphors that must be interpreted. I reject those who try to have it both ways. In order to have a meaningful discussion about the Bible one's position must be clarified. Can you please what is your position on this?
But I don't view God as something universally good because crusades, inquisition, wars have been waged in God's name, and according to the Bible, with God's approval. This speaks to the aspect that the Bible and religion in general is a conspiracy to make people kill others in order for the king to enrich himself. It is a conspiracy to suppress the weaker sex, to justify slavery, etc.
I don't see a 'great falling away' and I don't know where you referenced it from.
To the contrary, I view the possibility that it may come true with concern because "Your kingdom come, your will be done, on earth, as it is in heaven" would not be a 'godly' regime, it would be a tyranny. That, again, relates to the issue the Bible was created and still is used today for the purpose of a conspiracy, a world-wide conspiracy.
Now, about the Bible, yes it does matter if the earth was created in 7 days.
My favorite lie is that Mary was still a virgin after she got pregnant.
Originally posted by ThinkingHuman
Originally posted by borntowatch
Jesus is the visible form of God the Father
You can make that argument, yes, but it is a silly argument. Either 'he' is human or 'it' is God. If you want to have it both ways, IMO, you are irrational. Many frauds have claimed to be an incarnation of God, to be prophets, etc. I repeat: Jesus' claim that he is God (maybe true - but does not mean that by seeing Jesus you 'see' God.
It seems silly to me to claim, that proving a document is fraudulent should be done without testing the document.
Now if you dont believe that fine but it seems silly to use scripture that you dont accept to support your argument.
It seems to me that I crossed a line of sensitivity with you. I am sorry, this was not my intent. But I don't believe I have said anything different from what I have said before. And remember, you are on a site called "Above Top Secret" in a forum called "Conspiracy in Religion".
Originally posted by AQuestion
your anger at God is apparent
Again, I have come to disbelieve in a Christian God. So, No, I do not complain about God doing anything. But I am wary about those who claim to know what is "God's will", or what God did, or would do, or should do.
You complain that God controlling the world in the future would be tyranny yet, you wish him to take control now and make everyone nice and stop all pain.
I was not trying to imply shallowness on your part, quite the contrary. That is why I gave you long answers.
Just so you understand, I have been on ATS for more than a hot second ... do my answers show that shallowness in my thinking?
Does it say that in the Bible?
a universal sentience, that is God
This is a discussion about conspiracy in the Bible. Obviously, I need to refer to the parts that suggest a conspiracy. Is this to avoid addressing the issue? If Mary did not exist at all, that would even add to the conspiracy that I suggested about the fatherhood.
going through a list of possible mistakes in the bible?
So how long did it take? Or does it not matter? Do any facts matter or are they too inconvenient to analyze?
A day is the difference between darkness and light