It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by Kashai
Matter is Energy (E=mc2) from a perspective.
Any thoughts?
Only that consciousness is not in that equation.
decisions are made by unconscious me 7 seconds before conscious me…
Originally posted by HarryTZ
reply to post by jiggerj
If you don't want to hear one of the possibilities than you cannot possibly accept the truth, whether it is that "consciousness has always existed" or something completely different. You have to be open to any answer that is given to you. At this point, the metaphysics aren't even important. It's the internal process in which you view the metaphysics (and everything else).
Originally posted by Kashai
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by Kashai
Matter is Energy (E=mc2) from a perspective.
Any thoughts?
Only that consciousness is not in that equation.
Are you suggesting that it will never be?
Originally posted by Kgnow
reply to post by HarryTZ
I and I met this "emptiness" and "nothingness". I and I were quite lonely and bored. Oh what trifles and illusions we have painted here for our own folly! The door that leads back is always at hand, though we oftentimes look everywhere except the obvious, enchanted by our own devices.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by Kashai
Matter is Energy (E=mc2) from a perspective.
Any thoughts?
Only that consciousness is not in that equation.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by HarryTZ
reply to post by jiggerj
If you don't want to hear one of the possibilities than you cannot possibly accept the truth, whether it is that "consciousness has always existed" or something completely different. You have to be open to any answer that is given to you. At this point, the metaphysics aren't even important. It's the internal process in which you view the metaphysics (and everything else).
Quite right. To Just Believe that an intelligent entity of any kind has always been and always will be, without any process of itself being created is pure folly. We could just as well start a whole new religion on the eternal plaid dragon that sacrificed its tail for us - hey, prove that this dragon doesn't exist.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by Kashai
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by Kashai
Matter is Energy (E=mc2) from a perspective.
Any thoughts?
Only that consciousness is not in that equation.
Are you suggesting that it will never be?
Yes, actually, because that equation is part of the process that created consciousness. Well, created OUR consciousness.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Energy is used to create everything.
The problem is that we live in a world that accepts 'somethingness' as a reality.
Originally posted by Kashai
So what you are saying is that mankind is incapable of solving certain problems inherent to nature?
reply to post by arpgme
Energy IS everything. NOTHING is created. Things are FORMED out of the already existing energy. ...
So yes, Consciousness is energy because EVERYTHING is energy.
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by HarryTZ
The problem is that we live in a world that accepts 'somethingness' as a reality.
The problem is that we are always ready to accept ideas that can't be proven. It's perfectly fine to toss these ideas around, but when we start calling something a truth before it can be validated we run the risk of sending science down a wrong alley for possibly centuries.
Here we are, apparently a bunch of somethings living in something called a universe where we can't even reduce something to nothing, yet many are claiming that this is all a bunch of nothing. We HAVE to accept this somethingness because that's what all evidence points to, with absolutely NO evidence pointing any other way.
Originally posted by jiggerj
if it [consciousness] had to be formed out of energy?
Originally posted by HarryTZ
Originally posted by jiggerj
if it [consciousness] had to be formed out of energy?
Where has this been proven? Nowhere, because it's just an assumption. Scientists just assume consciousness is the result of neural activity because they don't think there could be any other explanation. Not very scientific, if I may say so myself.edit on 25-6-2013 by HarryTZ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by HarryTZ
There's no evidence that points to somethingness. In fact...
www.newscientist.com...
I've posted this link multiple times in multiple threads, it really helps prove my points
Originally posted by HarryTZ
Originally posted by jiggerj
if it [consciousness] had to be formed out of energy?
Where has this been proven? Nowhere, because it's just an assumption. Scientists just assume consciousness is the result of neural activity because they don't think there could be any other explanation. Not very scientific, if I may say so myself.edit on 25-6-2013 by HarryTZ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by HarryTZ
There's no evidence that points to somethingness. In fact...
www.newscientist.com...
I've posted this link multiple times in multiple threads, it really helps prove my points
Two words from that article sum it up nicely "Theory says"
Like I said, it's fun to go all philosophical on this stuff, but we can't take it seriously when ALL the evidence points to somethingness. We touch things. We eat things. We feel pain when something on our body is injured. Absolutely everything points to somethingness. We can't say, oh yeah, but it's all in our minds, or the space between atoms in 99% empty blah blah blah. No, no, no - no matter how you color it, we're still something.edit on 6/26/2013 by jiggerj because: (no reason given)