posted on Nov, 14 2004 @ 08:53 PM
That is very commendable , and thank you for defending our liberties by offering to do so . Regardless of any political right or wrong precieved by
the civilian population regarding the current war , I believe that the current voulntary armed services are " contractually " obligated to serve the
commader and chief without question . ( I am being non-partisan here , and keeping my personal views to myself here...)
For along time it seemed that all that was done was 'training" , and allowed many people an income , guaranteed student loans , and veteran
benefiets whithout any combat service . That is fine , they voulonteered to be readily available , and they were . Thanks to all of them...
As a follow up question if you don't mind : HOW have your views changed , and in the "land of the free" how do you think mandatory armed service
is NOT against the premise the Constitution sets forth . Are there not enough enlisted men and women already ? Obligation to the government is the
basis of my question...