Originally posted by sifacomp
reply to post by cartenz
I recant the things I have learned.
The new Act will take precedence over existing rules of common law and equity and over delegated legislation. By Clause 6(1) it will be “unlawful for any public authority to act in a way which is incompatible with one or more Convention rights”. Clause 6(3)(a) makes it clear that courts and tribunals at all levels are within the definition of “public authority” for this purpose. Clause 2(1) provides that in determining any question which has arisen under the Act in connection with a Convention right, all courts and tribunals must take into account any relevant judgment of the European Court of Human Rights, opinion of the European Commission of Human Rights, or decision of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe.
I believe some bad times are coming and there needs to be a way for us to lawfully defend ourselves from it.
Originally posted by cartenz
reply to post by Wifibrains
Out of what? There are plenty of legal defences for crimes committed--but refusing to acknowledge the authority of the courts is not one of them.
One well known loop hole was the Dietrich Principal--basically that if the state could not afford your lawyer then you had to have the case re-heard (which it wasnt)
Many ways to defend many crimes...
Why must we defend, if we defend then we are shown to be liable, and the being found guilty/not guilt will be out of our hands, where has your control over your destiny gone then?
There are many things now classed as crimes that are not crimes, they are simply policies and rules that place restrictions on us to create revenue.
To be free is to be unrestricted.
The real freeman Woo is about learning that you have a trust, and also a corporation, like the info in the OP the freeman also learn how we are dead. the freemen realize this and begin to educate themselves to find a way out of the matrix, out of laws and trusts that seek to enslave us within this pyramid shaped matrix. This is forbidden, no one leaves the matrix, and the agents tell everyone it's impossible.
There is a way to get above the law within the matrix, but you have to become agents, and work to keep the structure strong. Enforcing. These agents are every where but they are all the same just like in the film. When you have seen one you can see them all. They are so obvious it's unreal. Hiding behind shades in the shadows.
The way the agents are taught the way above the law "within" the matrix is exactly the same as what the freeman realize. They learn about the name, the corporation, and the trust, and they are taught how to use it properly.
In the higher echelons they don't need money. Just a signature will suffice, a taste of freedom. isn't that right cartenz? (your avatar, location and sig)
I could go on, but I might as well just give you the third degree.....
Brother... Until now you have been dead, welcome to your trust and corps.
Now we shall resurrect you. MAUOOHAHAHAAAA
Mmmmm, a corps and a trust. I'll be danmed.
The freemen on the land are pure and the realisations are from the heart. They see the matrix for what it is, they know It's not real and think for themselves guided by the heart. They are aware of who and what they really are. Devine beings with god given rights. They know right from wrong and they don't need laws to tell them. They are able to think "free" unlike the agents in this thread repeating a doctrine and trying to get you to conform.
The Freemasons do learn it for themselves, however, it's done through being shown symbols. This is mind control guys and you need to wake up to what has been done to you. Everyone knows that if you stare at a spiral you get hypnotised, and the experts you are in symbolism you failed to see it. You were tempted by the matrix, you strayed from the centre. but it's not too late if you still have a heart. If not then your clinically dead anyway. Metaphorically speaking.
Agents wake up. You can't see the beast trough the eyes of a demon.
Freeman woo is freemasonary....from the heart.
The ban on filming in law courts will now be overturned, Clarke confirmed, as the government hopes to improve transparency and public understanding of the courts.
The issue had been due to go for consultation with senior judges but in recent days Downing Street had moved to circumvent this consultation process and support the change.
There is a third reason for a broad-based decision and analysis. It so happens that Mr. Meads has provided a remarkable and well developed assortment of OPCA documents, concepts, materials, and strategies. These materials also illustrate particular idiosyncrasies that this and other Courts have identified as associated with the OPCA community and OPCA litigation. Phrased differently, Mr. Meads’ materials and approach provide an ideal type specimen for examination and commentary, which should be instructive to other OPCA litigants who have been taken in by these ideas, opposing parties and their counsel, as well as gurus.
Exept conepts of 'right' and 'wrong' are subjective; they are underpinned by the values of the subject. My values of right and wrong could differ greatly from yours.
So if we don't see eye to eye, one will always be wrong. That's what jury's are for, the majority decides. I have no preconceived perceptions of you as a human, we are all the same, but different. I'm sure in the real world you are real nice, generous, even caring. My perceptions of the mason is where the sarcasm and snide remarks come from. Don't take it personally, you are more a human than a mason.
Right now though we are in virtual reality on the interweb. We can do what we want in the fiction as we cause no harm. Is that right, Or did I miss the boat?
May I ask, are you a lawyer?
Originally posted by mykingdomforthetruth
Its true if you have a birth certificate you are subject to statute law in the uk, If you dont have a birth certificate and are british born you are only subject to common law there is a massive difference, British born freemen cannot be prosecuted under statute law as they have no identification only thing is the government will forcé any citizen to register the birth of their child most parents that opt out get demonised and they generally lose their child to government Foster carers
statute law deals with petty offences that generally only carry a fine but fining a freeman is almost imposible unless they agree to pay it..most gypsys in the uk are freemen they dont pay fines worry about speed cammeras or public order offences they basicaly tell judges to # off with a smile everytime they see 1 because they know its either time in jail as a John doe or go home to the caravan at an undisclosed location, It costs roughly 90 pounds a day to keep a uk prisoner and the judge knows this when he passes sentances so statute law is a preffered method of punishment freemen are very real danger to that method of control
In response to the Gypsies being imprisoned. Their crimes are common-law crimes, they stole from people, this is not covered in statute, but in Common Law.
It's about us identifying ourselves as a citizen, part of the corporation under admiralty law, when we do this we give jurisdiction that binds us to contracts most know nothing about.
Wrong again, they have corporations, they are not corporations!