posted on Jun, 22 2013 @ 04:16 PM
I would suggest to the OP that these laws are true, Freemen are valid, they are effectively sovereigns. The legal status is constitutional and falls
into "Lawful Rebellion". It is defined in the magna carta. To pre-empt people, the UK has 2 written constitional documents AND a bill of
The Crown is a corporation owned and controlled in the City of London (A City State, like the Vatican and the District of Columbia). The laws they
create are statutes and they literally get away with deceiving everyone that these are the laws of the land. The application of these laws, in the
constitution, is by consent - without consent, we would live in tyranny. The deceipt applied by the City Empire implies tyranny. These laws are not
taught to any of us, we literally grow up believing what we are told, without other knowledge to assist in thinking otherwise.
I have seen successful claims against Judges where appelants literally scare the Judge out of court and get cases dismissed - lawfully. For a judge
not to swear oath is called Treason, to assist a person evade a charge of Treason is to commit the crime of Rescue. Treason is practiced by
magistrates and judges all over the UK.
By being a Freemen, you rescind consent for the Crown and its laws. It is a constitutional duty to defend the free laws of the land should they be
eroded by the Monarch, which is the public 'face' of the Crown. This is a duty which is why the legal status of Lawful Rebellion exists.
The human-rights act is a direct erosion of our liberty as it is a statute of limitations. I have seen quoted parts of this bill that says that
political discent puts you in the category of forfeiting your right to life, in the same way that if you are about to shoot someone, and a policeman
shoots you first, then tough, your fundamental right is taken away due to your actions of harm against another. There are quiet moves in the upper
eschelons of the UK gov. that try to push replacing the UK's constitution with the Human Rights Act and similar.
There are apparently voices that try to decry Lawful Rebels as Terrorists !!!!
Crime, in its base, is when you create a victim or when you breach contract and leave debt,damages etc (Tort law). Removing consent states that you
have no contract with the Crown; (that the implicit contract being used by the Crown is a fraud seems to go unnotices).
Liken this to being a member of a Golf Club, where a shirt and tie are required. Without a shirt and tie, you are not allowed in, you have breached
contract. If you don't like it, you can leave the club. This is the situation with the constitution and the Crown. If you don't like it, you can
leave; on leaving, the Club has no right to complain about you poor dress sense.
If you are being or naturalised in a country and that is your home country, you don't have to move to another country. If you did, you are living in
a tyranny. To protect you, Freemen and lawful rebellion are constitional lawful positions. The Crown is tyrannical and decietful as well as greedy,
and the number of Freemen is increasing.
In Canada, and indeed the US, both of which are Crown property (the US 'won' the war of independence, but didn't actually liberate itself sadly),
this law applies. A couple of years ago it was reported in Canada about concern in increasing numbers of people claiming freedom and being in Lawful
Rebellion (some 330,000 quoted at the time, if my memory serves me correctly). I believe these laws are valid in the US. That a judge says not
isn't suprising, US judges appear to be utterly corrupted. As are most UK judges, with a lot of vested, and self-interest.
Also, don't forget, though the US is a country, the United States, the United Kingdom and other Crown properties are registered corporations (the UK
has CCJ's). They are clubs, not countries.
Without contract, you are not obliged to pay taxes, anti-pot laws don't apply (on this issue, the Crown is the worlds first armed drugger-runner and
pusher (the opium wars in China), if everyone grew, where would their profits be), also, with regards wealth control and economic subordination, you
are not allowed to grow your own wealth out of the ground), parking tickets, and ALL other statutes DO NOT APPLY, you have removed your consent and
are not part of the club.
You do of course have to comply with Common Law. The process of liberation is Claiming Your Rights. Anyone can do it, even if you had a birth
certificate. Interesting point, that without a birth certificate, you are Freeman at birth - brilliant information for all those concerned about this
and want a family. Too late for me or mine.
Hope this assists information.